Jump to content

Papiss Cissé


Guest kingdawson

Happy Cisse has left?  

240 members have voted

  1. 1. Happy Cisse has left?

    • Yes
      2
    • No
      6


Recommended Posts

Guest Roger Kint

I didnt notice that Evans continues kicking him as the ref walks over mind. Both so fucking thick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, our fans, ladies and gents:

 

lordbuckethead • 16 minutes ago

my two penn'orth ...

 

1 - while it's disgusting and can spread diseases, I'd rather be spat at than have my leg snapped in two

 

2 - Evans is pretty useless so will be no big loss for Man Utd

 

3 Cisse - I'm not a fan. Hope ban is long and costly.

 

(recap) refused to wear shirt when Wonga became new sponsor as it conflicted with his religious beliefs (charging interest is banned under Islam/sharia law) Shortly after he was filmed gambling in a casino. Gambling is also forbidden under sharia law.

 

4 - neither of these donkeys actually managed to hit the target from a few feet!

 

Thick as pig's shit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Genuinely don't get why there is a 6 match automatic ban for spitting but not some potentially career ending tackles.  Priorities completely wrong.

Especially for Cisse, who was reacting to someone spitting on him for no apparent reason :lol:

 

I'm not defending his actions, it's horrible, but a 6 game ban for it is pathetic. There's no justification for it what-so-ever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Genuinely don't get why there is a 6 match automatic ban for spitting but not some potentially career ending tackles.  Priorities completely wrong.

Especially for Cisse, who was reacting to someone spitting on him for no apparent reason :lol:

 

I'm not defending his actions, it's horrible, but a 6 game ban for it is pathetic. There's no justification for it what-so-ever.

 

Agreed - obviously it's a disgusting thing to do, but spitting always seems to get elevated to the level of the worst thing you can ever do on a football field.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how a longer ban is justified in any way really, a 3 game ban is already extensive and more than enough punishment for almost any wrongdoing on a football pitch. Adding extensions to this doesn't achieve anything, it just adds further separation from the elite clubs and the rest. Chelsea or Man City lose a player for 6 games and they can usually replace them with a suitable replacement, most of the rest of the league can't.

 

Petty shit will happen on a football field, throwing extensive bans at people isn't the answer though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cisse was stupid to react but it would never have happened if that little shit hadn't spat at him in the first place. Easy to say he shouldn't have reacted, but a lot of people would have done a lot worse in the heat of the moment. Personally though I'd rather be spat at then have someone try to go through my leg with a high tackle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, sport is strange in that provocation isn't a mitigating circumstance. Your opponent can do anything to you and if you react you're treated the same as him, if not more harshly.

Yeah, I usually wouldn't mind if the punishment was sensible in the first place, but 6 games, even for Evans, is ridiculous. For Cisse it seems insane (and even more insane if it's extended to 7). Whoever is making these decisions needs hockling on.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, sport is strange in that provocation isn't a mitigating circumstance. Your opponent can do anything to you and if you react you're treated the same as him, if not more harshly.

Yeah, I usually wouldn't mind if the punishment was sensible in the first place, but 6 games, even for Evans, is ridiculous. For Cisse it seems insane (and even more insane if it's extended to 7). Whoever is making these decisions needs hockling on.

 

and then stamped on the knee seeing as that's not such a serious offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking into account his elbow - his uncharacteristic indiscipline this season a longer ban is justified.

 

I do think had he not retaliated with a spit, Evans would've escaped a ban.

 

Tend to agree with this TCD.

 

If you're going to get banned for spitting, he might as well have made it a big flemmy greeny and hockled it right across Evans's face.

 

There's a nice thought as you tuck into your lunch............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, sport is strange in that provocation isn't a mitigating circumstance. Your opponent can do anything to you and if you react you're treated the same as him, if not more harshly.

Yeah, I usually wouldn't mind if the punishment was sensible in the first place, but 6 games, even for Evans, is ridiculous. For Cisse it seems insane (and even more insane if it's extended to 7). Whoever is making these decisions needs hockling on.

 

and then stamped on the knee seeing as that's not such a serious offence.

Rather someone broke me legs than hockled in me face, marra.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, sport is strange in that provocation isn't a mitigating circumstance. Your opponent can do anything to you and if you react you're treated the same as him, if not more harshly.

Yeah, I usually wouldn't mind if the punishment was sensible in the first place, but 6 games, even for Evans, is ridiculous. For Cisse it seems insane (and even more insane if it's extended to 7). Whoever is making these decisions needs hockling on.

 

and then stamped on the knee seeing as that's not such a serious offence.

Rather someone broke me legs than hockled in me face, marra.

 

All of this. + Hans post about how a 6 match ban for spitting. The fuck man. In retrospect, if you break someone's leg with a nasty tackle, you may just go unpunished. But spitting is far worse.

 

This sport is fucking stupid sometimes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

George Boyd got a 3 game ban for the exact same thing not long ago, the talk of extended bans seems a bit weird to me.

 

Apparently they've changed the rules this season and doubled the ban for spitting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FA love things like this in publicised issues where the intent is clear to see, they'll come down hard to look as though there a zero tolerant organisation and look for credit from everyone. When it comes to any footballing incident where intent is as clear cut as someone spiting or biting, isnt picked up by the media or isnt backed from the public they'll continue to bottle it and go along trying not to upset the apple cart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...