Guest bimpy474 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Why is that twonk Shepard saying the GK took him out, he never touched him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Away goals don't count, ffsss. They do after extra time Then what help are they going to be to Swansea when Chelsea now have to score 2 goals in Swansea to level the tie. Are you dense? Chelsea have have to score at least 2 goals to level the tie which would make it level after ET on away goals. There is no situation where the away goals rule will put Swansea through so why did the commentator emphasise the importance of them for Swansea. He's emphasising the importance of them because now Chelsea have to win away from home by two goals? My point is why did he emphasise the importance of Swansea's lead being with 2 away goals, their goals being away goals have no importance, them being 2 goals up is the only importance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Stifler's right tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Spend our entire budget on Laudrup, he would probably better than Obertan even at this stage anyway so he can play too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Away goals don't count, ffsss. They do after extra time Then what help are they going to be to Swansea when Chelsea now have to score 2 goals in Swansea to level the tie. Are you dense? Chelsea have have to score at least 2 goals to level the tie which would make it level after ET on away goals. There is no situation where the away goals rule will put Swansea through so why did the commentator emphasise the importance of them for Swansea. He's emphasising the importance of them because now Chelsea have to win away from home by two goals? My point is why did he emphasise the importance of Swansea's lead being with 2 away goals, their goals being away goals have no importance, them being 2 goals up is the only importance. Commentator got it wrong, plain and simple. Like you say Swansea being able to go though on away goals is irrelevent as far as Swansea are concerned. Only Chelsea can now do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Laudrup just oozes positivity when he speaks. So jealous of Swansea right now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Away goals don't count, ffsss. They do after extra time Then what help are they going to be to Swansea when Chelsea now have to score 2 goals in Swansea to level the tie. Are you dense? Chelsea have have to score at least 2 goals to level the tie which would make it level after ET on away goals. There is no situation where the away goals rule will put Swansea through so why did the commentator emphasise the importance of them for Swansea. He's emphasising the importance of them because now Chelsea have to win away from home by two goals? My point is why did he emphasise the importance of Swansea's lead being with 2 away goals, their goals being away goals have no importance, them being 2 goals up is the only importance. It's just semantics though isn't it. He was praising them for going and winning 0-2 away from home in a first leg and making it very difficult for Chelsea to get through, now Chelsea have to do the same to even stand a chance. I really don't think the fact that on a technicality Swansea can't actually win on the away goals rule matters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Can Laudrup parlé francais? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Away goals don't count, ffsss. They do after extra time Then what help are they going to be to Swansea when Chelsea now have to score 2 goals in Swansea to level the tie. Are you dense? Chelsea have have to score at least 2 goals to level the tie which would make it level after ET on away goals. There is no situation where the away goals rule will put Swansea through so why did the commentator emphasise the importance of them for Swansea. He's emphasising the importance of them because now Chelsea have to win away from home by two goals? My point is why did he emphasise the importance of Swansea's lead being with 2 away goals, their goals being away goals have no importance, them being 2 goals up is the only importance. It's just semantics though isn't it. He was praising them for going and winning 0-2 away from home in a first leg and making it very difficult for Chelsea to get through, now Chelsea have to do the same to even stand a chance. I really don't think the fact that on a technicality Swansea can't actually win on the away goals rule matters. Because of the scoreline it wouldn't matter anycase, as Chelsea have to score at least 2 to save the tie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Laudrup just oozes positivity when he speaks. So jealous of Swansea right now. Note how he mentioned how different they played tonight compared to their 'normal game'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Hey Demba, http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/33117340.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Can Laudrup parlé francais? Probably speaks every language but I'd imagine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Away goals don't count, ffsss. They do after extra time Then what help are they going to be to Swansea when Chelsea now have to score 2 goals in Swansea to level the tie. Are you dense? Chelsea have have to score at least 2 goals to level the tie which would make it level after ET on away goals. There is no situation where the away goals rule will put Swansea through so why did the commentator emphasise the importance of them for Swansea. He's emphasising the importance of them because now Chelsea have to win away from home by two goals? My point is why did he emphasise the importance of Swansea's lead being with 2 away goals, their goals being away goals have no importance, them being 2 goals up is the only importance. It's just semantics though isn't it. He was praising them for going and winning 0-2 away from home in a first leg and making it very difficult for Chelsea to get through, now Chelsea have to do the same to even stand a chance. I really don't think the fact that on a technicality Swansea can't actually win on the away goals rule matters. Because of the scoreline it wouldn't matter anycase, as Chelsea have to score at least 2 to save the tie. Makes for a very good 2nd leg, if Swansea score Chelsea really will have to go at them, even more than already need to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Away goals don't count, ffsss. They do after extra time Then what help are they going to be to Swansea when Chelsea now have to score 2 goals in Swansea to level the tie. Are you dense? Chelsea have have to score at least 2 goals to level the tie which would make it level after ET on away goals. There is no situation where the away goals rule will put Swansea through so why did the commentator emphasise the importance of them for Swansea. He's emphasising the importance of them because now Chelsea have to win away from home by two goals? My point is why did he emphasise the importance of Swansea's lead being with 2 away goals, their goals being away goals have no importance, them being 2 goals up is the only importance. It's just semantics though isn't it. He was praising them for going and winning 0-2 away from home in a first leg and making it very difficult for Chelsea to get through, now Chelsea have to do the same to even stand a chance. I really don't think the fact that on a technicality Swansea can't actually win on the away goals rule matters. Because of the scoreline it wouldn't matter anycase, as Chelsea have to score at least 2 to save the tie. Yeah - away from home, which is going to be hard. Which is exactly why Swansea doing it is impressive and worthy of commentary praise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Laudrup just oozes positivity when he speaks. So jealous of Swansea right now. Our manager is the complete opposite, in the press anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Laudrup just oozes positivity when he speaks. So jealous of Swansea right now. Not to mention that even at his age he's still better than the majority of our starting line up for Norwich Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Hey Demba, http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/33117340.jpg To be fair, I'd kill for Ivanovic in our side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Aye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Laudrup just oozes positivity when he speaks. So jealous of Swansea right now. Our manager is the complete opposite, in the press anyway. Biggest thing for me is he always calls things fairly like the quote Dave pointed out above. Unlike our manager who has an excuse for every thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Aye. But tonight he might have lost them the cup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Ramos sent off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Wouldn't he be the top scorer this in our squad if he joined? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Can Laudrup parlé francais? Probably speaks every language but I'd imagine. He's probably got a PhD in molecular biology or something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Can Laudrup parlé francais? Apparently he can speak Italian, Spanish alongside obviously Danish and English... He can also understand but not speak Swedish & Japanese... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 Can Laudrup parlé francais? Apparently he can speak Italian, Spanish alongside obviously Danish and English... He can also understand but not speak Swedish & Japanese... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts