Ikon Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Mbiwa has more or less been promised to start for us and will do so soon. Slowly slotting him in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanSkÃrare Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Taylor has been in good enough form, he should play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Taylor has been in good enough form, he should play. There's arguments for both really. As I'd say Yanga-Mbiwa and Colo on Thursday night looked a better partnership than Colo and Taylor have together recently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Any 2 of the 3 in this form, it really doesn't bother me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Any 2 of the 3 in this form, it really doesn't bother me. Great "problem" to have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Feels weird wanting all three to play (Skirge, please no ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Krul Mbiwa. Saylor. Coloccini Debuchy. Cabaye. Tiote. Santon Sissoko. HBA Cisse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontenacity Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Krul Mbiwa. Saylor. Coloccini Debuchy. Cabaye. Tiote. Santon Sissoko. HBA Cisse In all seriousness this would, theoretically at least, look plausible. It would allow both Santon and Debuchy to attack more regularly, whilst also allowing HBA and Sissoko to be central where they are more influential. This is Pardew though- tactical experimentation? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Just stick to 4 at the back please, the last few times we've tried the 3 at the back/2wingbacks we got well and truly butt raped Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 3 at the back has been horrendous for us in the past and scares the shit out of me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VanBarduck Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 3 at the back has been horrendous for us in the past and scares the s*** out of me. It depends on who's playing and what their qualities are , with simpson , perch or even Ryan Taylor at LB , like we use to play about a year ago , it sure looks scary . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Krul Mbiwa. Saylor. Coloccini Debuchy. Cabaye. Tiote. Santon Sissoko. HBA Cisse In all seriousness this would, theoretically at least, look plausible. It would allow both Santon and Debuchy to attack more regularly, whilst also allowing HBA and Sissoko to be central where they are more influential. This is Pardew though- tactical experimentation? Maybe it's not a formation to start the game with, but possibly one to change to, bringing on the extra CB during the game to turn a result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VanBarduck Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Krul Mbiwa. Saylor. Coloccini Debuchy. Cabaye. Tiote. Santon Sissoko. HBA Cisse Would love to see that someday , it take some guts to post that in here , people are so frigid Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Krul Mbiwa. Saylor. Coloccini Debuchy. Cabaye. Tiote. Santon Sissoko. HBA Cisse Would love to see that someday , it take some guts to post that in here , people are so frigid I don't think our coaching staff could implement it effectively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 I rate Gouffran though, could push Sissoko back next to Cabaye, in place of Tiote & play Gouffran next to HBA. Fuck it, all out attack! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VanBarduck Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 Krul Mbiwa. Saylor. Coloccini Debuchy. Cabaye. Tiote. Santon Sissoko. HBA Cisse Would love to see that someday , it take some guts to post that in here , people are so frigid I don't think our coaching staff could implement it effectively. Premier League coach of the year Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VanBarduck Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 I rate Gouffran though, could push Sissoko back next to Cabaye, in place of Tiote & play Gouffran next to HBA. f*** it, all out attack! Your formation mean less defensive duties for both Cabaye and Ben Arfa , our most creatives players also the opposite team winger's will sit back more often with the toughts of Debuchy and Santon running all over them , juve implement that tactic 2 years ago , but their coach is named Antonio Conte Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 3-5-2 or whatever could easily work for us as long as we had quite a pragmatic manager that would make the opposite worry about our formation. Sadly that is not possible due to Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 I rate Gouffran though, could push Sissoko back next to Cabaye, in place of Tiote & play Gouffran next to HBA. f*** it, all out attack! Your formation mean less defensive duties for both Cabaye and Ben Arfa , our most creatives players also the opposite team winger's will sit back more often with the toughts of Debuchy and Santon running all over them , juve implement that tactic 2 years ago , but their coach is named Antonio Conte We certainly have the players for it. But Pards is tactically retarded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 There is one issue with that apart from the fact Pardew couldn't do it..... we would need more defensive depth. It took us about 8 windows to buy a f*ckin defender. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 As well as everything else he brings to the team his pace is going to be a huge asset for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Such a classy defender. I'll stick my neck out and say he's better than Colo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Such a classy defender. I'll stick my neck out and say he's better than Colo. No disrespect to Taylor either but he and Colo are quite easily a level above him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 He stays at us for a few years and he'll easily stake a claim to being our best ever centre half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Such a classy defender. I'll stick my neck out and say he's better than Colo. No disrespect to Taylor either but he and Colo are quite easily a level above him. It's their footballing ability. Taylor is a good defender but limited footballer. They're both very good defenders and footballers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now