Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Play offs :lol: . Why don't we just stick 10 minutes of adverts on every time the ball goals out, or fire glitter cannons into the crowd at half time for "entertainment purposes".

 

Is this what it has come to? People not having the attention span to be able to watch a 38 game season?

 

I despair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This thread needs to be locked and it's quite clear the NFL should never be discussed on here if these are genuine opinions.

 

I f***ing love playoffs

 

giphy.gif

 

You're like a tabloid journalist cherry picking quotes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

I love the playoff set up for American sports, where you have different conferences and a s*** load of teams.  I don't see the need for it in England, when we have league systems that work well, with the current format. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

Sanity. The fact any of that even needs to be pointed out once, let alone 100 times, is highly concerning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

I love the playoff set up for American sports, where you have different conferences and a s*** load of teams.  I don't see the need for it in England, when we have league systems that work well, with the current format. 

Chortle.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

I love the playoff set up for American sports, where you have different conferences and a s*** load of teams.  I don't see the need for it in England, when we have league systems that work well, with the current format. 

The record books show that we won like.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

I love the playoff set up for American sports, where you have different conferences and a s*** load of teams.  I don't see the need for it in England, when we have league systems that work well, with the current format. 

The record books show that we won like.

 

The fact you think that's what this argument is about says it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kaizero clearly an American wannabe.  You're a scando, accept it and move on.

 

We almost added play-offs to our league. We're further along than you already.

 

:lol: Sweden had play-offs in the 80's and early 90's but dumped it because it's shit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

I love the playoff set up for American sports, where you have different conferences and a s*** load of teams.  I don't see the need for it in England, when we have league systems that work well, with the current format. 

The record books show that we won like.

 

The fact you think that's what this argument is about says it all.

 

Yeah.  He's either somehow totally missed the point or being a hilarious WUM.....

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

I love the playoff set up for American sports, where you have different conferences and a s*** load of teams.  I don't see the need for it in England, when we have league systems that work well, with the current format. 

The record books show that we won like.

 

The fact you think that's what this argument is about says it all.

 

Yeah.  He's either somehow totally missed the point or being a hilarious WUM.....

 

He just wants some time away from the wife.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The Giants were the best team and had the best quarterback to be fair like.

 

Pats went into that game with an 18-0 record.  The Giants came in as a wildcard, with a 10-6 record.  Oh and no way Eli Manning was/is better than Tom Brady.  I have no idea what you're getting at?  In what way were they the 'best team?'  The best team for that one off game?  Yes.  Better team and quarterback over the course of 16-20 games?  No way.

 

I love the playoff set up for American sports, where you have different conferences and a s*** load of teams.  I don't see the need for it in England, when we have league systems that work well, with the current format. 

The record books show that we won like.

 

The fact you think that's what this argument is about says it all.

 

Yeah.  He's either somehow totally missed the point or being a hilarious WUM.....

 

He just wants some time away from the wife.

 

Think the wife gets the best end of that deal tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

Yep. Bumping it. Fuck you.

 

If Six teams cam move with impunity financially and everyone else is food, something drastic needs to be done or the league is dead. There's nothing to protect anymore the PL is not a league it's a product.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Mike said:

Yep. Bumping it. Fuck you.

 

If Six teams cam move with impunity financially and everyone else is food, something drastic needs to be done or the league is dead. There's nothing to protect anymore the PL is not a league it's a product.

 

Globally, ensuring a closed-shop at the top is arguably preferable for the PL? The majority of domestic and global fans are for Arse, Man U, Liverpool, City, and Chelsea. Having a Villa or Newcastle disrupt this group could be off-putting to those fans, and therefore damaging to the product.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mike said:

Yep. Bumping it. Fuck you.

 

If Six teams cam move with impunity financially and everyone else is food, something drastic needs to be done or the league is dead. There's nothing to protect anymore the PL is not a league it's a product.

What about the Play-In :smugdog:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Turnbull2000 said:

 

Globally, ensuring a closed-shop at the top is arguably preferable for the PL? The majority of domestic and global fans are for Arse, Man U, Liverpool, City, and Chelsea. Having a Villa or Newcastle disrupt this group could be off-putting to those fans, and therefore damaging to the product.

 

Which is why we're here with all the money in the world watching our season get fucked before it starts. But on the pitch, head to head? We beat All of those fucking teams. They're beating us here because they couldn't fuck with us where it was supposed to matter. 

 

Playoffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GallowgatePigeon said:

Anyone else wish these cartel bums would finally form their super league and fuck off for good?

But but they wanted to be still in the league aswell as the super league. Greedy bastards. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...