Mick Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 His top lip never moves. Get rid of that flashing thing man, it's shit in so many ways. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Pardew is protecting his player there. Simple as that. You'd slate him if did the opposite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Pardew is protecting his player there. Simple as that. You'd slate him if did the opposite. What are you on about? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Pardew is protecting his player there. Simple as that. You'd slate him if did the opposite. Or as he should have done said nothing, no comment as it's been dealt with by the courts. To say it was a misunderstanding is ridiculous in the extreme and tbh he deserves all the stick he gets for saying it. What Pardew has said is an insult to peoples intelligence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Pardew is protecting his player there. Simple as that. You'd slate him if did the opposite. Why defend someone that has obviously broken the law and was seeking to do so?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Pardew is protecting his player there. Simple as that. You'd slate him if did the opposite. Or as he should have done said nothing, no comment as it's been dealt with by the courts. To say it was a misunderstanding is ridiculous in the extreme and tbh he deserves all the stick he gets for saying it. What Pardew has said is an insult to peoples intelligence. Exactly, why not just leave it be, he broke the law, got caught breaking the law and was duly punished. There was no reason to blatantly lie, treat us like window lickers and advocate a criminal offence!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 This is one of those 'over reactions' tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 This is one of those 'over reactions' tbh. Aye discussing Pardew in the Pardew thread, about what he has just said in his latest press conference that was today. Maybe we shouldn't talk about todays press conference and what Pardew said in it, in this thread called "The Pardew Thread". FFS unbelievable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Just had to checked i was in the Pardew thread then, never know with this place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DebuchyAndTheBeast Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Pardews record as NUFC Manager P 136 W 49 D 38 L 49 Win%: 36 NUFC Managers win % records (10 games or more) from 1992 - present Chris Hughton (59.3%) - massively skewed by the season in the Championship Kevin Keegan 92-97 (54.9%) Sir Bobby Robson (46.6%) Glenn Roeder (45.8%) Graham Souness (44.8%) Kenny Dalglish (38.4%) Alan Pardew (36%) Ruud Gullit (34.6%) Sam Allardyce (33.3%) Kevin Keegan 2008 (28.5%) Joe Kinnear (22.2%) Shows how rubbish Pardew is when you look at the three managers above him TBF you'd also have to add another column showing total money spent to get a broader view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Pardews record as NUFC Manager P 136 W 49 D 38 L 49 Win%: 36 NUFC Managers win % records (10 games or more) from 1992 - present Chris Hughton (59.3%) - massively skewed by the season in the Championship Kevin Keegan 92-97 (54.9%) Sir Bobby Robson (46.6%) Glenn Roeder (45.8%) Graham Souness (44.8%) Kenny Dalglish (38.4%) Alan Pardew (36%) Ruud Gullit (34.6%) Sam Allardyce (33.3%) Kevin Keegan 2008 (28.5%) Joe Kinnear (22.2%) Shows how rubbish Pardew is when you look at the three managers above him TBF you'd also have to add another column showing total money spent to get a broader view. TBF that wouldn't be a fair comparison either as there's been some dire shit bought by some of those managers for extortionate money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Gah, what shit managers we've had It's now been over a decade since we've gotten an appointment right with the possible exception of Hughton, and not a single one of our managers after Keegan have enhanced their reputation and moved on to better things through working with us. Staggering when you think about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Other than Keegan, Sir Bobby and to a lesser extent Hughton, we've largely had a rough ride It always pains me to know the last Sir Bobby knew of NUFC was the relegation season. For all the talk about the moral issues surrounding it, I would definitely advocate cloning in his instance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 You have to be fair to Pardew with that manager win %. He hasn't been backed in the way some of those managers were. Mind you just think of who he would buy if it was his decisions, like some of those managers were able to. Obertan and Elliot .....but to be fair Ba was a Pardew pick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Never understood the use of win % Points percentage is a much better measure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 .... Or you could just watch a few games from each era and witness with your own eyes?! To many variables to consider any data indubitable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 I mean, what's the point of the data anyway. Most of the people on that list were just not good enough and a few % here and there doesn't really make any appreciable difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Win percentage is more important as you don't get anywhere with drawing all the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Win percentage is more important as you don't get anywhere with drawing all the time. There's no reward for games won. The league is based on points. You get further drawing 4 than winning 1 and losing 3 but ranging managers on wins says the later is better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Win percentage is more important as you don't get anywhere with drawing all the time. There's no reward for games won. The league is based on points. You get further drawing 4 than winning 1 and losing 3 but ranging managers on wins says the later is better. You get further by by 50% by winning 2 and losing 2. It's the bloody reason the 3 points for a win was introduced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Cup games should also not be counted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 A rather novel idea is to judge managers by the football their team produces and the results that come with it, with ones own eyes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 Win percentage is more important as you don't get anywhere with drawing all the time. There's no reward for games won. The league is based on points. You get further drawing 4 than winning 1 and losing 3 but ranging managers on wins says the later is better. You get further by by 50% by winning 2 and losing 2. It's the bloody reason the 3 points for a win was introduced. And that would be accounted for in a points ranking. It's better in all circumstances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts