Jump to content

Sunderland


Nobody

Recommended Posts

I mean, this doesn't really mean he's a paedophile, it does mean he's a bit of a slime with no self control mind.

 

How doesn't it it means exactly that

 

Hebephile

 

Still massively wrong, obviously.

 

 

True still underage - just can't believe still how the so called 'classy club' acted if any set of fans and club deserves to go down it's that lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, this doesn't really mean he's a paedophile, it does mean he's a bit of a slime with no self control mind.

 

How doesn't it it means exactly that

Peadophilia is when a person is soley/mostly sexually aroused by pre-pubescent people, unless the victim hit puberty very late in her life then at the age of 15 you would assume that she's already well into puberty thus meaning an attraction to her would not be classed as Peadophilia.

An sole/primary attraction to someone who is aged from 15-to early/mid late 20's is called ephebophilia, this is the most common philia across the world with over 90% of the worlds population having a sole/primary attraction to people in this age range. This would be what Adam Johnson is classed as. The case alleges that he acted on his sexual desires with someone who is not legally able to consent. I'm not defending him at all, what he did was wrong but there is a difference between being a peadofile and an ephebophile and in cases like this the definition of paedophile is used instead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, this doesn't really mean he's a paedophile, it does mean he's a bit of a slime with no self control mind.

 

How doesn't it it means exactly that

Peadophilia is when a person is soley/mostly sexually aroused by pre-pubescent people, unless the victim hit puberty very late in her life then at the age of 15 you would assume that she's already well into puberty thus meaning at attraction to her would not be classed as Peadophilia.

An sole/primary attraction to someone who is aged from 15-to early/mid late 20's is called ephebophilia, this is the most common philia across the world with over 90% of the worlds population having a sole/primary attraction to people in this age range. This would be what Adam Johnson is classed as. The case alleges that he acted on his sexual desires with someone who is not legally able to consent. I'm not defending him at all, what he did was wrong but there is a difference between being a peadofile and an ephebophile.

It's all black and white where PAEDOS are concerned Stif, you're either vehemently against them and their crab DNA or you're one of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, this doesn't really mean he's a paedophile, it does mean he's a bit of a slime with no self control mind.

 

How doesn't it it means exactly that

 

Hebephile

 

Still massively wrong, obviously.

A hebophile is someone who is soley/mostly attracted to children in the early stages of puberty (usually 11-14). Hebophilia sits between Peadophilia and ephebophilia.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea whether Sunderland are still planning on allowing him to play on Saturday?

 

Seen mixed rumours but nothing official as of yet.

 

Surely they can't play him but then again nothing would surprise me with that lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, this doesn't really mean he's a paedophile, it does mean he's a bit of a slime with no self control mind.

 

How doesn't it it means exactly that

Peadophilia is when a person is soley/mostly sexually aroused by pre-pubescent people, unless the victim hit puberty very late in her life then at the age of 15 you would assume that she's already well into puberty thus meaning at attraction to her would not be classed as Peadophilia.

An sole/primary attraction to someone who is aged from 15-to early/mid late 20's is called ephebophilia, this is the most common philia across the world with over 90% of the worlds population having a sole/primary attraction to people in this age range. This would be what Adam Johnson is classed as. The case alleges that he acted on his sexual desires with someone who is not legally able to consent. I'm not defending him at all, what he did was wrong but there is a difference between being a peadofile and an ephebophile.

It's all black and white where PAEDOS are concerned Stif, you're either vehemently against them and their crab DNA or you're one of them.

I don't think you will find many people who condone what he has done (I don't). I'm just saying the definition is technically wrong.
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Any idea whether Sunderland are still planning on allowing him to play on Saturday?

 

Seen mixed rumours but nothing official as of yet.

 

Surely they can't play him but then again nothing would surprise me with that lot

 

Bar us, they couldn't have picked a worse set of away fans for abuse that's for sure!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any idea whether Sunderland are still planning on allowing him to play on Saturday?

 

Seen mixed rumours but nothing official as of yet.

 

Surely they can't play him but then again nothing would surprise me with that lot

You would think so but fat sam said on saturday that he would be available to play throughout the trial.

 

Id be astounded if he does play but im half hoping he does to see what reaction the unwashed give him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Any idea whether Sunderland are still planning on allowing him to play on Saturday?

 

Seen mixed rumours but nothing official as of yet.

 

Surely they can't play him but then again nothing would surprise me with that lot

 

Bar us, they couldn't have picked a worse set of away fans for abuse that's for sure!

Agree with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Any idea whether Sunderland are still planning on allowing him to play on Saturday?

 

Seen mixed rumours but nothing official as of yet.

 

Surely they can't play him but then again nothing would surprise me with that lot

 

Bar us, they couldn't have picked a worse set of away fans for abuse that's for sure!

 

I Man U fans will for sure and even more so with his City connections

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Bar us, they couldn't have picked a worse set of away fans for abuse that's for sure!

 

I Man U fans will for sure and even more so with his City connections

 

They came up with this one on the way up here last season!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...