pinkeye Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I was 16 in the month of September yet I was not eligible to leave school until the following summer. What a stupid statement for him to make regarding asking the girl about her age... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 He likes a woman who definitely won't be doing A Levels. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 A better way to phrase that question would have been "when do you leave school?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Cross-examining, Ms Blackwell QC asked why it took more than a year before he entered guilty pleas. Ms Blackwell QC asked: “Were there 60,000 very good reasons why you did not plead guilty?” She reminded Johnson how the schoolgirl told the court she had been called a “s***” and a “liar” ever since the allegations came to light. Johnson said: “I can’t control the fans.” Ms Blackwell QC said: “£60,000. As long as you played for the football club was another week you extended the excruciating pain for the the girl wasn’t it?” Johnson replied: “Yes” Ms Blackwell QC recalled Johnson’s final game for Sunderland football club and how the player threw his shirt into the crowd. “You knew the game was up”, she said. I absolutely love this prosecution lawyer, she is going to rip him a new one over the course of today and tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 As unfortunate as that is, I can't say I wouldn't do the same to keep £60k a week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 As unfortunate as that is, I can't say I wouldn't do the same to keep £60k a week. I think the point is that it's showing his dishonesty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 You see, that's the kind if thing you use the 'just making conversation' line on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I'm seriously confused now. Has he just thought that footballers just spend money on lawyers or something? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Reminds me of that movie where Jim Carrey loses the ability to lie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 he's not very good at this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Just don't get his defence at all, I'm understanding the 'be honest' to try and appear honest for the other two charges but not when you've admitted that you've lied for the past 11 months. "I was a liar but I'm honest now like" "It's just convenient that I'm not guilty of the two more serious offences that have less incriminating evidence" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoppaz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 http://share.gifyoutube.com/pFJ.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 it's like he's read some Paedophillia For Dummies guide or something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heake Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 This is the ultimate "tap in" for a prosecution lawyer. She could come on singing vaudeville sobs for a couple of days and he'd still be bang to rights. Can't the judge just chuck a legal "towel in" so to speak? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 KB: "You were intending to meet her on the next occasion at a place that provided you with the ultimate level of privacy." AJ: "Yes, but we never did." KB: "The reason you wanted the ultimate level of privacy because you intended on engaging in sexual activity with her." AJ: "Yes." Prosecution doesnt even need to try Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 The only conclusion I can draw is that eventually after a couple of days of this contradictory, juvenile nonsense he enters a plea of insanity which by this time will be irrefutable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 "Mr Johnson had read that young girls are 90% more likely to offer sexual favours after hearing a successful penis joke." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 This is the ultimate "tap in" for a prosecution lawyer. She could come on singing vaudeville sobs for a couple of days and he'd still be bang to rights. Can't the judge just chuck a legal "towel in" so to speak? Johnson is free to change his plea at any time, he would have done it by now if he was going to. He'll be hoping that the prosecution cannot prove beyond all reasonable doubt to the jury that he is a liar. Based on the evidence that has been shared by the media, I'd be very surprised at this stage if he is found not guilty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 The only conclusion I can draw is that eventually after a couple of days of this contradictory, juvenile nonsense he enters a plea of insanity which by tis time will be irrefutable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 This is the ultimate "tap in" for a prosecution lawyer. She could come on singing vaudeville sobs for a couple of days and he'd still be bang to rights. Can't the judge just chuck a legal "towel in" so to speak? Johnson is free to change his plea at any time, he would have done it by now if he was going to. He'll be hoping that the prosecution cannot prove beyond all reasonable doubt to the jury that he is a liar. Based on the evidence that has been shared by the media, I'd be very surprised at this stage if he is found not guilty. Is he going to change it to Very Guilty just to be on the safe side Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 You're on trial for feeling her private parts. Might as well say that's what you wanted to do. But definitely didnt. Obviously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heake Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 There's bound to be a queue of people it up with to get a slice of his wedge when they see how easy this is. Regardless of the outcome, he's admitted to being a sexual predator with a tendency for young uns. With form. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts