Jump to content

Sunderland


Nobody

Recommended Posts

What has all the shaving stuff got to do with the case? Why the hell were they talking about it?

 

Evidence last week suggested he sent a picture of his "shaved groin area" to the girl, today he said he only ever shaves his chest on holiday so it isn't as sweaty and never his legs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What has all the shaving stuff got to do with the case? Why the hell were they talking about it?

 

Evidence last week suggested he sent a picture of his "shaved groin area" to the girl, today he said he only ever shaves his chest on holiday so it isn't as sweaty and never his legs.

 

But surely the picture can be traced to its origin?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was a pretty difficult case to defend, but his supposed superstar lawyer doesn't seem to have done him much good.

 

Should have brought back Dick Advocaat, he's got the perfect name to be defence QC in a case like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly cant believe how horrific this is all going for Johnson/Sunderland :lol: it's actually quite comical if you ignore the fact that there is a young girl who got felt up by this weirdo.

 

Fully expect Johnson to turn up to court tomorrow with a massive net and tell them that he uses it to catch kids.

 

This is also his best photo...

 

 

Nowt will happen to Sunderland though. They played  a player that helped get them survival last season. It went well for them, if anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was a pretty difficult case to defend, but his supposed superstar lawyer doesn't seem to have done him much good.

 

Should have brought back Dick Advocaat, he's got the perfect name to be defence QC in a case like this.

 

Only so much a lawyer can do when it's this bad :yao:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was a pretty difficult case to defend, but his supposed superstar lawyer doesn't seem to have done him much good.

 

Should have brought back Dick Advocaat, he's got the perfect name to be defence QC in a case like this.

 

Only so much a lawyer can do when it's this bad :yao:

 

He could always try the Chewbacca defense

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was a pretty difficult case to defend, but his supposed superstar lawyer doesn't seem to have done him much good.

 

Should have brought back Dick Advocaat, he's got the perfect name to be defence QC in a case like this.

 

Only so much a lawyer can do when it's this bad :yao:

 

Christ, it must be like watching this in that courtroom. Is his lawyer called George?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is he trying to 'show remorse' or something to get a lesser sentence? Is it not far too late for that?

Seems to me he's admitting the stuff he's already plead guilty too while also admitting he had intent to go further *but didn't* which is the story he ultimately wants the jury to believe. Makes a certain amount of sense to me as I don't think the charges include intent to nonce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess he's being honest about all this stuff, so that he seems like he tells the truth and when he says "I wanted to have sex but we didn't" the jury believe him.

 

The club knowing is f***ed up. I've not wanted to comment on them, making this an us-them thing, but that's disgraceful stuff.

 

The only problem with the strategy is that he pleaded not guilty all the way up until the trial, so if you're on the jury you have to be thinking 'this lads full of shit'

Is that right though? He was charged then released and plead guilty on the first day of the trial didn't he?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess he's being honest about all this stuff, so that he seems like he tells the truth and when he says "I wanted to have sex but we didn't" the jury believe him.

 

The club knowing is f***ed up. I've not wanted to comment on them, making this an us-them thing, but that's disgraceful stuff.

 

The only problem with the strategy is that he pleaded not guilty all the way up until the trial, so if you're on the jury you have to be thinking 'this lads full of shit'

Is that right though? He was charged then released and plead guilty on the first day of the trial didn't he?

 

He pleaded NG in all the hearings before trial - hence the trial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...