Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Earlier today

 

OP: "Is it from the very beginning that you were attracted to her and wanted to have some sort of sexual relationship with her?"

 

AJ: "Yes."

 

 

just now

 

He has now said that at the time he gave his number, he did not want to kiss her and was not sexually attracted to her. He has said he thought she was attractive and that he gave her his number because she seemed like a genuine fan.

 

AJ: "My intention then wasn't to have sexual activity with her."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cross-examining, Ms Blackwell QC asked why it took more than a year before he entered guilty pleas.

 

Ms Blackwell QC asked: “Were there 60,000 very good reasons why you did not plead guilty?”

 

She reminded Johnson how the schoolgirl told the court she had been called a “s***” and a “liar” ever since the allegations came to light.

 

Johnson said: “I can’t control the fans.”

 

Ms Blackwell QC said: “£60,000. As long as you played for the football club was another week you extended the excruciating pain for the the girl wasn’t it?”

 

Johnson replied: “Yes”

 

Ms Blackwell QC recalled Johnson’s final game for Sunderland football club and how the player threw his shirt into the crowd.

 

“You knew the game was up”, she said.

 

I absolutely love this prosecution lawyer, she is going to rip him a new one over the course of today and tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Just don't get his defence at all, I'm understanding the 'be honest' to try and appear honest for the other two charges but not when you've admitted that you've lied for the past 11 months.

 

"I was a liar but I'm honest now like"

"It's just convenient that I'm not guilty of the two more serious offences that have less incriminating evidence"

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the ultimate "tap in" for a prosecution lawyer.

She could come on singing vaudeville sobs for a couple of days and he'd still be bang to rights.

Can't the judge just chuck a legal "towel in" so to speak?

Link to post
Share on other sites

KB: "You were intending to meet her on the next occasion at a place that provided you with the ultimate level of privacy."

 

AJ: "Yes, but we never did."

 

KB: "The reason you wanted the ultimate level of privacy because you intended on engaging in sexual activity with her."

 

AJ: "Yes."

 

 

Prosecution doesnt even need to try

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...