Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So they’ve lost 305m over three years.

 

Without that bullshit 40m ‘exceptional’ payment from Covid which no other team got, as well as the 35m payment for ‘exceptional costs’ related to the share sale to the Rat, they would have been screwed.

 

Unbelievable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Poon Raccoon said:

So they’ve lost 305m over three years.

 

Without that bullshit 40m ‘exceptional’ payment from Covid which no other team got, as well as the 35m payment for ‘exceptional costs’ related to the share sale to the Rat, they would have been screwed.

 

Unbelievable.


I find it more unbelievable that other clubs not challenging why these 75m was allowed

Link to post
Share on other sites

From Popbitch :lol:

Dave Brailsford might have come to football off the back of a stellar sports guru career, feted by the media, but at Manchester Utd he's generally thought to be, well, a bit of a prat.

 

No-one's quite sure what he's really there to do (apart from say "yes" to anything Sir Jim says) but he's taken to wandering around Old Trafford and Carrington sticking his nose into everything, explaining his appearance with the phrase:

 

"I don't need to be here. I live in Monaco. I'm only here for you guys".

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Zero said:

I find it more unbelievable that other clubs not challenging why these 75m was allowed

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, gdm said:

Enjoy 

 

So the fans now has to pay more to make up for the money they spent on the Anthonys, the Rashfords and the Sanchos.

 

 

Edited by Erikse

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

So why did most other clubs get only 1m ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

No club had anywhere near the amount you lot were allowed, good accounting and other clubs clearly missed a trick, but shows what a farce it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

Bullshit!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. 

 

Hope this helps. 

The accounts not being public doesn't mean that the PL can't see them.  This was textbook favouritism; a Man Utd being punished by PSR rules will happen when hell freezes over

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

The accounts not being public doesn't mean that the PL can't see them.  This was textbook favouritism; a Man Utd being punished by PSR rules will happen when hell freezes over

 

 

Why on earth would the EPL not be transparent on covid allowances when there are dire consequences for failing PSR?

I think I have my own answer. If it's secret and not published, that is an issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Poon Raccoon said:

So why did most other clubs get only 1m ?

 

They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire.

 

Source:

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/

 

4 hours ago, Rod said:

Bullshit!

 

See above my friend.

 

4 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

No club had anywhere near the amount you lot were allowed, good accounting and other clubs clearly missed a trick, but shows what a farce it is.

 

See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. 

 

Spoiler

17376984307033558532719948433289.thumb.jpg.147d9ed042b1c5865702027894beacec.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by TaylorJ_01

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...