Manchester United

[Conjo]

I'll stand corrected

 

 

[TheBrownBottle]

On 25/01/2025 at 01:40, Ben said:

 

He’s talking like a man who wants his payoff tbf.  Proper Cloughie at Leeds vibes. 
 

edit: mind, if that happened, then Brexit Jim spent six months chasing Ashworth, created a load of fuss, paid us millions to buy out his contract, sacked him when he suggested Southgate instead of Amorim costing millions again, sacked Amorim at a further cost of millions, only to appoint Southgate in any case.

 

Please do it, you useless tax dodging cunt. 

 

 

Edited January 26 by TheBrownBottle

[Stifler]

8 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

He’s talking like a man who wants his payoff tbf.  Proper Cloughie at Leeds vibes. 
 

edit: mind, if that happened, then Brexit Jim spent six months chasing Ashworth, created a load of fuss, paid us millions to buy out his contract, sacked him when he suggested Southgate instead of Amorim costing millions again, sacked Amorim at a further cost of millions, only to appoint Southgate in any case.

 

Please do it, you useless tax dodging cunt.

It’s a Richard Keys opinion piece, so it’s 110% wrong, and 150% said to gain attention.

The only surprising thing is he never suggested Howe as his replacement, just to fuck off our fanbase once again.

[TheBrownBottle]

19 minutes ago, Stifler said:

It’s a Richard Keys opinion piece, so it’s 110% wrong, and 150% said to gain attention.

The only surprising thing is he never suggested Howe as his replacement, just to fuck off our fanbase once again.

Got you - well in that case it’s utter bollocks  

[Ben]

7 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Got you - well in that case it’s utter bollocks  

 

It would be great though

[gdm]

That’s a disgrace if the government put a single penny towards it 

[Dokko]

3 minutes ago, gdm said:

That’s a disgrace if the government put a single penny towards it 

 

If they did, I'd go against all my principles and vote whoever is the party to challenge them, be it Reform or Tory. 

[Funtime Frankie]

4 minutes ago, Dokko said:

 

If they did, I'd go against all my principles and vote whoever is the party to challenge them, be it Reform or Tory. 

Maybe it won't be financial help but regulatory to approve planning instantly.

 

I saw this discussed on SSN and was thinking this government will be helpful to push through our plans for a new stadium even if there are blockers

[gdm]

6 minutes ago, Dokko said:

 

If they did, I'd go against all my principles and vote whoever is the party to challenge them, be it Reform or Tory. 

Not sure I’d go that far but protests against it would certainly be needed. 

[gdm]

Just now, Funtime Frankie said:

Maybe it won't be financial help but regulatory to approve planning instantly.

 

I saw this discussed on SSN and was thinking this government will be helpful to push through our plans for a new stadium even if there are blockers

Like to hope so 

[Dokko]

Just now, Funtime Frankie said:

Maybe it won't be financial help but regulatory to approve planning instantly.

 

I saw this discussed on SSN and was thinking this government will be helpful to push through our plans for a new stadium even if there are blockers

 

That's absolutely fine. Backing it with removing the usual red tape slowing the UK down is one thing, but playing any part in funding it would be a massive mistake. 

[astraguy]

7 minutes ago, Dokko said:

 

If they did, I'd go against all my principles and vote whoever is the party to challenge them, be it Reform or Tory. 

Same

[Funtime Frankie]

2 minutes ago, Dokko said:

 

That's absolutely fine. Backing it with removing the usual red tape slowing the UK down is one thing, but playing any part in funding it would be a massive mistake. 

Not sure why any funding would be a massive mistake to a point sure. If they contribute sufficient to get a benefit via taxation or growth from the funding I don't see how this is a bad thing

[Kid Icarus]

Just now, Funtime Frankie said:

Not sure why any funding would be a massive mistake to a point sure. If they contribute sufficient to get a benefit via taxation or growth from the funding I don't see how this is a bad thing

Socialising the funding and privatising the revenue for a club that's already extremely wealthy from its privatised revenue is an absolute con job. 

[bobbydazzla]

Manchester has already had the Etihad regeneration  

 

It has the BBC 

 

Newcastle got a white elephant battery factory in Blyth that inevitably went to shit before a single battery was ever made. And we can’t even get enough money to pay for all the paint we need to tidy up the Tyne Bridge  

 

Who can I sue about this plan to pump even more money into Manchester ? 
 

The cunts in Westminster are Mr Bumble the beadle and Tyneside is Oliver fucking Twist 

 

 

Edited January 26 by bobbydazzla

[gdm]

[Ikon]

Can see Fulham beating them easily today. Popcorn time! 

[KaKa]

3 minutes ago, Ikon said:

Can see Fulham beating them easily today. Popcorn time!

 

Can't wait! 

[Ben]

We shouldn't have any planning issues for New St James Park now then.

[Joelinton7]

Would rather Fulham not have a confidence boost before next week 

[The Fountain]

5 hours ago, Dokko said:

 

If they did, I'd go against all my principles and vote whoever is the party to challenge them, be it Reform or Tory. 

I'd be pissed off but I'm not gonna jeapordise the NHS and  workers rights over it 

[r0cafella]

Wrong thread. 

 

 

Edited January 26 by r0cafella

[El Prontonise]

Just now, r0cafella said:

Id be fuming if I was a spurs fan. What they have served up in this second half has been pathetic. 

 

Wrong thread?

[Hhtoon]

Proper mid-table 6 pointer today. 

[Stifler]

4 hours ago, Ben said:

We shouldn't have any planning issues for New St James Park now then.

We still will in my opinion. They’ll only open it up for hosing, and so far, like every other government, they haven’t actually done anything that would smooth the planning process.