SiLvOR Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Fuck off Quinn, hope you get pissed and plough your car into a ditch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 how the hell did Cardiff beat Southampton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 He's already let go of his arm as he enters the area. His hand is basically only brushing away from Whickams hand by the time he gets into the area. Its a red, but again not a pen even disregarding the dodgy advantage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Will still probably end 2-2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Will still probably end 2-2 Will end up 4 or 5-0. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Quinn and Souness saying it was a pen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Dowd is corrupt. Ner. Ref was spot on. The guy f***ed up and tried to make up for it by pulling him back. It was about 5 yards outside the box. You can give a penalty if the pull carries on into the box, but you can't go back after the striker has gone around the GK, to cross it. The advantage was over. It was either give the free kick immediately, give the penalty if you felt it carried on into the box. The length of time on the advantage was ridiculous, if you go back to the foul. How so? Thought the free-kick or pen is always given at the first point of contact. It's part of the rules of the game (refeering), you're told to give free kick for shirt pulling/holding immediately, but it's added that if a pull starts outside the box and continues into the box then you can give a penalty. The two conflict imo, but they're the rules and as a ref you judge them in your opinion in any given incident. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Watched it again and it was a brilliant decision by Dowd, imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 how the hell did Cardiff beat Southampton Marshall had a blinder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiLvOR Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Watched it again and it's a brilliant decision by Dowd, imo. It would have been had it been instant, but he's allowed play to go on far too long. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Quinn and Souness saying it was a pen They are both panheads Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 This is going to be a horrible day of football Sunderland winning and Liverpool is going to beat Chelski aswell and win the PL. Awful! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Watched it again and it was a brilliant decision by Dowd, imo. The decision is ok, it's the length of time on the advantage that's wrong imo. Allowing Wickham to go around the GK to cross it, that's where the problem is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Doesn't really matter either way tbh, Cardiff have been terminally shite and if he'd given it straight away he'd still have been off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Still don't agree he continued to foul him inside the area, he pulls him outside the area. But by the time Whickem steps inside he's let go and any contact is nothing more than his hand brushing Whickams arm on the way back, not enough contact to be called a foul. Its definitely a red from the foul before hand though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Watched it again and it was a brilliant decision by Dowd, imo. The decision is ok, it's the length of time on the advantage that's wrong imo. Allowing Wickham to go around the GK to cross it, that's where the problem is. It was a proper FIFA advantage, I'll give you that Still the correct decision in my book. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Dowd is corrupt. Ner. Ref was spot on. The guy f***ed up and tried to make up for it by pulling him back. It was about 5 yards outside the box. You can give a penalty if the pull carries on into the box, but you can't go back after the striker has gone around the GK, to cross it. The advantage was over. It was either give the free kick immediately, give the penalty if you felt it carried on into the box. The length of time on the advantage was ridiculous, if you go back to the foul. How so? Thought the free-kick or pen is always given at the first point of contact. It's part of the rules of the game (refeering), you're told to give free kick for shirt pulling/holding immediately, but it's added that if a pull starts outside the box and continues into the box then you can give a penalty. The two conflict imo, but they're the rules and as a ref you judge them in your opinion in any given incident. If it was a tackle outside the box leading to the player falling inside it, that would be a free-kick? I can't understand the logic that an offence can happen outside the box and not be called, but when it happens inside, it's valid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Just seen the pen incident. How was it a pen, when the first contact was outside the box? Jammy mackem bastards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Dowd is corrupt. Ner. Ref was spot on. The guy f***ed up and tried to make up for it by pulling him back. It was about 5 yards outside the box. You can give a penalty if the pull carries on into the box, but you can't go back after the striker has gone around the GK, to cross it. The advantage was over. It was either give the free kick immediately, give the penalty if you felt it carried on into the box. The length of time on the advantage was ridiculous, if you go back to the foul. How so? Thought the free-kick or pen is always given at the first point of contact. It's part of the rules of the game (refeering), you're told to give free kick for shirt pulling/holding immediately, but it's added that if a pull starts outside the box and continues into the box then you can give a penalty. The two conflict imo, but they're the rules and as a ref you judge them in your opinion in any given incident. If it was a tackle outside the box leading to the player falling inside it, that would be a free-kick? I can't understand the logic that an offence can happen outside the box and not be called, but when it happens inside, it's valid. No not a tackle, a free kick is given where the tackle contact is. It's only pulling and holding that can carry on into the box. I completely disagree with the ruling but it's there as much as i hate it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Dowd is corrupt. Ner. Ref was spot on. The guy f***ed up and tried to make up for it by pulling him back. It was about 5 yards outside the box. You can give a penalty if the pull carries on into the box, but you can't go back after the striker has gone around the GK, to cross it. The advantage was over. It was either give the free kick immediately, give the penalty if you felt it carried on into the box. The length of time on the advantage was ridiculous, if you go back to the foul. How so? Thought the free-kick or pen is always given at the first point of contact. Wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Oh well, at least we get to see Solskjaer and Vincent Tan go down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 No not a tackle, a free kick is given where the tackle contact is. It's only pulling and holding that can carry on into the box. I completely disagree with the ruling but it's there as much as i hate it. Just one of those weird rules that doesn't make much sense then. Wrong Thanks for the lengthy explanation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Keep looking at Fulham's fixture list and thinking '...surely?' Couldn't ask for better fixtures. Two mid table teams with nothing to play for. Sigh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 This is going to be a horrible day of football Sunderland winning and Liverpool is going to beat Chelski aswell and win the PL. Awful! At least things should improve tomorrow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 No not a tackle, a free kick is given where the tackle contact is. It's only pulling and holding that can carry on into the box. I completely disagree with the ruling but it's there as much as i hate it. Just one of those weird rules that doesn't make much sense then. Wrong Thanks for the lengthy explanation. Plenty of other weird ones like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts