Big Geordie Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Just seen the pen incident. How was it a pen, when the first contact was outside the box? Jammy mackem bastards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Dowd is corrupt. Ner. Ref was spot on. The guy f***ed up and tried to make up for it by pulling him back. It was about 5 yards outside the box. You can give a penalty if the pull carries on into the box, but you can't go back after the striker has gone around the GK, to cross it. The advantage was over. It was either give the free kick immediately, give the penalty if you felt it carried on into the box. The length of time on the advantage was ridiculous, if you go back to the foul. How so? Thought the free-kick or pen is always given at the first point of contact. It's part of the rules of the game (refeering), you're told to give free kick for shirt pulling/holding immediately, but it's added that if a pull starts outside the box and continues into the box then you can give a penalty. The two conflict imo, but they're the rules and as a ref you judge them in your opinion in any given incident. If it was a tackle outside the box leading to the player falling inside it, that would be a free-kick? I can't understand the logic that an offence can happen outside the box and not be called, but when it happens inside, it's valid. No not a tackle, a free kick is given where the tackle contact is. It's only pulling and holding that can carry on into the box. I completely disagree with the ruling but it's there as much as i hate it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Dowd is corrupt. Ner. Ref was spot on. The guy f***ed up and tried to make up for it by pulling him back. It was about 5 yards outside the box. You can give a penalty if the pull carries on into the box, but you can't go back after the striker has gone around the GK, to cross it. The advantage was over. It was either give the free kick immediately, give the penalty if you felt it carried on into the box. The length of time on the advantage was ridiculous, if you go back to the foul. How so? Thought the free-kick or pen is always given at the first point of contact. Wrong Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Oh well, at least we get to see Solskjaer and Vincent Tan go down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 No not a tackle, a free kick is given where the tackle contact is. It's only pulling and holding that can carry on into the box. I completely disagree with the ruling but it's there as much as i hate it. Just one of those weird rules that doesn't make much sense then. Wrong Thanks for the lengthy explanation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Keep looking at Fulham's fixture list and thinking '...surely?' Couldn't ask for better fixtures. Two mid table teams with nothing to play for. Sigh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 This is going to be a horrible day of football Sunderland winning and Liverpool is going to beat Chelski aswell and win the PL. Awful! At least things should improve tomorrow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 No not a tackle, a free kick is given where the tackle contact is. It's only pulling and holding that can carry on into the box. I completely disagree with the ruling but it's there as much as i hate it. Just one of those weird rules that doesn't make much sense then. Wrong Thanks for the lengthy explanation. Plenty of other weird ones like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Liverpool FC @LFC 1m Confirmed #LFC team v @chelseafc: Mignolet, Johnson, Flanagan, Skrtel, Sakho, Gerrard, Allen, Lucas, Coutinho, Sterling, Suarez Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Is Johnson made of tissue ffs. Wanker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 The Da Silva brothers are both retarded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Liverpool FC @LFC 1m Confirmed #LFC team v @chelseafc: Mignolet, Johnson, Flanagan, Skrtel, Sakho, Gerrard, Allen, Lucas, Coutinho, Sterling, Suarez More interested in what the Chelsea lineup would be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Liverpool FC @LFC 1m Confirmed #LFC team v @chelseafc: Mignolet, Johnson, Flanagan, Skrtel, Sakho, Gerrard, Allen, Lucas, Coutinho, Sterling, Suarez More interested in what the Chelsea lineup would be. Aye, still not there, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DebuchyAndTheBeast Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Think that it has been the story of their season. Being shit most of the time but relying on the form of a few players to keep their heads out of the water . Bardsley, Ki, Johnson and now Wickham . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Think that it has been the story of their season. Being shit most of the time but relying on the form of a few players to keep their heads out of the water . Bardsley, Ki, Johnson and now Wickham . Sounds familiar, can't quite place it though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 #CFC Schwarzer/Azpilicueta Kalas Ivanovic Cole/Matic Mikel/Salah Lampard Schurrle/Ba Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Chelsea FC @chelseafc · 9s Chelsea team v Liverpool: Schwarzer; Azpilicueta, Ivanovic, Kalas, Cole; Lampard ©, Mikel, Matic; Salah, Ba, Schurrle. #CFC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Mags Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Fucking football man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Is that three full backs Chelsea are playing in their back four? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Cardiff look absolutely clueless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Is that three full backs Chelsea are playing in their back four? Ivanovic CB surely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 Is that three full backs Chelsea are playing in their back four? Ivanovic has actually played cb and is good there tbf. Know nowt about this Kalas fellow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest NobbyOhNobby Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 I'd have Daehli, think he's looked really good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted April 27, 2014 Share Posted April 27, 2014 I'd have Daehli, think he's looked really good The most promising Norwegian by quite some distance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts