Jump to content

Crystal Palace manager


Mick

Recommended Posts

Apparently he'll talk about why he left more during his presser on thursday 'if the press decide they want to know'.

 

Quite surreal seeing his interview after the Dover game and realizing he's not talking about us anymore  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardew is a good coach, but a poor tactician.

I can imagine Palace doing quite well until the rest of the season.

To explain, Pardew being a good coach is good at picking out what the team has been doing wrong, and improving them. In that interview he mentions that they're not opening up the pitch enough, and they're not getting the ball into dangerous areas often enough.

He'll improve that, and Palace will benefit.

 

It's after the current team's problems are ironed out that Palace will struggle. Once Pardew's 'fault-fixing' exercise finishes, he'll have no idea on how to progress the team forward from there onwards. He's a good auditor, a bad mastermind. Thus once he's at this point, he'll experiment with the team or rely on gut-feeling, rely on hard graft from his players, eventually falling to an extended form slump.

 

Once his team performs badly enough, he'll restart his fault-finding expedition, sparking a short winning spree. So the cycle will continue.

 

Expect Palace to do well until the end of this season, brace yourselves to be criticised by the media for not backing him. In the long run, we'll be proved right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardew is a good coach, but a poor tactician.

I can imagine Palace doing quite well until the rest of the season.

To explain, Pardew being a good coach is good at picking out what the team has been doing wrong, and improving them. In that interview he mentions that they're not opening up the pitch enough, and they're not getting the ball into dangerous areas often enough.

He'll improve that, and Palace will benefit.

 

It's after the current team's problems are ironed out that Palace will struggle. Once Pardew's 'fault-fixing' exercise finishes, he'll have no idea on how to progress the team forward from there onwards. He's a good auditor, a bad mastermind. Thus once he's at this point, he'll experiment with the team or rely on gut-feeling, rely on hard graft from his players, eventually falling to an extended form slump.

 

Once his team performs badly enough, he'll restart his fault-finding expedition, sparking a short winning spree. So the cycle will continue.

 

Expect Palace to do well until the end of this season, brace yourselves to be criticised by the media for not backing him. In the long run, we'll be proved right.

 

Disagree with this a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardew is a good coach, but a poor tactician.

I can imagine Palace doing quite well until the rest of the season.

To explain, Pardew being a good coach is good at picking out what the team has been doing wrong, and improving them. In that interview he mentions that they're not opening up the pitch enough, and they're not getting the ball into dangerous areas often enough.

He'll improve that, and Palace will benefit.

 

It's after the current team's problems are ironed out that Palace will struggle. Once Pardew's 'fault-fixing' exercise finishes, he'll have no idea on how to progress the team forward from there onwards. He's a good auditor, a bad mastermind. Thus once he's at this point, he'll experiment with the team or rely on gut-feeling, rely on hard graft from his players, eventually falling to an extended form slump.

 

Once his team performs badly enough, he'll restart his fault-finding expedition, sparking a short winning spree. So the cycle will continue.

 

Expect Palace to do well until the end of this season, brace yourselves to be criticised by the media for not backing him. In the long run, we'll be proved right.

 

The problem is he's not a good coach.  For example his solution to the bolded section won't be to train the players properly in off the ball movement and good passing shapes, it'll be to lump it long at the opposition box and play the percentages game which, for me anyway, is the worst, most unimaginative football possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What good coach doesn't spot that playing Gouffran on the wing simply never ever worked in the year or so he has played there? What good coach doesn't spot that Tiote gives the ball away 5 times out of 10? He's rubbish at everything apart from maybe pretending to care and pretending to talk a good game.

 

The word "fraud" is used a lot to describe Pardew on here, and it is not exaggerated one bit. He is very much a fraud of a football manager. As much of a fraud stealing a living as those ignorant pundits and journos talking shit at every turn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest NobbyOhNobby

Isn't that Jayshun's point though? We had initial 'success' playing gouffran wide, but once it stopped working pardew had no idea what to do.

 

I agree with the sentiment of the post, its the same as what we all think - pardew will start well but will then systematically kill the club, breaking record after record on the way

Link to post
Share on other sites

Winning mentality :lol:

 

"I said to the players that an FA Cup run gives confidence and it breeds a winning mentality, so we're in the hat and, like in any cup competition, if you're in it, you can avoid defeat."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What good coach doesn't spot that playing Gouffran on the wing simply never ever worked in the year or so he has played there? What good coach doesn't spot that Tiote gives the ball away 5 times out of 10? He's rubbish at everything apart from maybe pretending to care and pretending to talk a good game.

 

The word "fraud" is used a lot to describe Pardew on here, and it is not exaggerated one bit. He is very much a fraud of a football manager. As much of a fraud stealing a living as those ignorant pundits and journos talking shit at every turn.

But....but.... Pardew only picks the players.... It's not his fault *continues to drag knuckles*

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardew is a good coach, but a poor tactician.

I can imagine Palace doing quite well until the rest of the season.

To explain, Pardew being a good coach is good at picking out what the team has been doing wrong, and improving them. In that interview he mentions that they're not opening up the pitch enough, and they're not getting the ball into dangerous areas often enough.

He'll improve that, and Palace will benefit.

 

It's after the current team's problems are ironed out that Palace will struggle. Once Pardew's 'fault-fixing' exercise finishes, he'll have no idea on how to progress the team forward from there onwards. He's a good auditor, a bad mastermind. Thus once he's at this point, he'll experiment with the team or rely on gut-feeling, rely on hard graft from his players, eventually falling to an extended form slump.

 

Once his team performs badly enough, he'll restart his fault-finding expedition, sparking a short winning spree. So the cycle will continue.

 

Expect Palace to do well until the end of this season, brace yourselves to be criticised by the media for not backing him. In the long run, we'll be proved right.

 

Don't agree with this, I reckon he does have some decent coaching and man management to a degree (Due to the fact most the players don't hate him). I also agree he spots problems, but he has fuck all idea how to solve them, he won't open Palace up, he will try and close them down and reduce goals conceded every time as his front foot football is a myth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I reckon his attacking comments can be translated as follows:

 

"We need to hit the ball into their third faster.  From there hit the ball into the area as fast as possible with very little consideration for the likelihood of success."

 

Attrition attacking football is coming to Crystal Palace.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...