Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

We're coming up to the usual time when the accounts are revealed. I guess ours will be full of doom and gloom or a diverted reference as to why we had to create a profit in the last window.

 

Obviously the experts will give good reason why we only find out now how the books looked at a certain time prior and thus giving a false reading of how things actually are but this is Ashley's NUFC and the accounts dont reflect our potential or standing anyway.

 

At a guess id say we'll get them published by next Thursday but historically we've had them on the 30th March so we could find out tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Burnley made £30m profit after their last season back in the Premier League, then a £3m loss back in the Championship last season for a comparison when they come out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Burnley made £30m profit after their last season back in the Premier League, then a £3m loss back in the Championship last season for a comparison when they come out.

Comparing us to Burnley.  :jesuswept:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I just mean in terms of how much we've lost. I know the income on our part is massively different, but so too would have been the expenditure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

No I just mean in terms of how much we've lost. I know the income on our part is massively different, but so too would have been the expenditure.

There's no comparison with the new parachute payments anycase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok then I guess seeing last season's and this season's for both clubs will be interesting. (Burnley before the new parachute payments last season but with the new TV money in the Premier League, and us before the new TV money but the new parachute payments).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Still made a profit which, to be honest, was more than I was expecting.

Aye operating profit, if you include transfers our loss is ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

The lack of cash in the bank is a bad sign, would had meant we had a cashflow crisis this season and Ashley had to loan that club that £30m.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lack of cash in the bank is a bad sign, would had meant we had a cashflow crisis this season and Ashley had to loan that club that £30m.

Maybe it's time for the club to re-evaluate the pay up front model we've got? It puts us in a serious disadvantage in terms of pure cash. By all accounts, the Sissoko money will be trickling in the next several years, probably the same with Wijnaldum as well, while we will have paid for all our players up front. No wonder our cash reserves are thin like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

The lack of cash in the bank is a bad sign, would had meant we had a cashflow crisis this season and Ashley had to loan that club that £30m.

Maybe it's time for the club to re-evaluate the pay up front model we've got? It puts us in a serious disadvantage in terms of pure cash. By all accounts, the Sissoko money will be trickling in the next several years, probably the same with Wijnaldum as well, while we will have paid for all our players up front. No wonder our cash reserves are thin like.

Yeap, i wonder if any other team does it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lack of cash in the bank is a bad sign, would had meant we had a cashflow crisis this season and Ashley had to loan that club that £30m.

Maybe it's time for the club to re-evaluate the pay up front model we've got? It puts us in a serious disadvantage in terms of pure cash. By all accounts, the Sissoko money will be trickling in the next several years, probably the same with Wijnaldum as well, while we will have paid for all our players up front. No wonder our cash reserves are thin like.

Yeap, i wonder if any other team does it?

I highly doubt it. Another case of the idiots thinking they know best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they had actually hired a quality manager in the first place and bought the players this manager needed, then they probably wouldn't have been relegated.  Its their or rather Ashley's strategy and approach to football matters that's relegated the club twice.  Its all their own fault.  :lol: :lol:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lack of cash in the bank is a bad sign, would had meant we had a cashflow crisis this season and Ashley had to loan that club that £30m.

Maybe it's time for the club to re-evaluate the pay up front model we've got? It puts us in a serious disadvantage in terms of pure cash. By all accounts, the Sissoko money will be trickling in the next several years, probably the same with Wijnaldum as well, while we will have paid for all our players up front. No wonder our cash reserves are thin like.

Yeap, i wonder if any other team does it?

I highly doubt it. Another case of the idiots thinking they know best.

 

Fairly sure this is the standard model of transfers all over Europe, just not so much here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are also buggered if Spurs sell Sissoko....

 

Spurs selling Sissoko would in no way affect how much money we receive for him. The agreement is to receive the full amount of money over a given period. If they sell him, they would still have to pay us the rest of the money.

 

Damn right, you tell him...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...