Disco Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Bar the goal-line system I'd be truly loathe to introduce anymore technology in to football like bar more retrospective punishment but even then nearly everything it'd be used for would still be the same subjective matter as what people would want to see used in video evidence in the future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I'm sort of up for it now tbh, fucking fed up with bad decisions and the tedium that follows after the game. Trial it in a few preseason tournaments, see what happens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Be a riot to introduce manager challenges as in the NFL. Have them whip their little red flags on the field Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Be a riot to introduce manager challenges as in the NFL. Have them whip their little red flags on the field would be all over them like a rash on me cock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I've got a list. Shot clock and halfway line violation are up there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 What the fuck you on about Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I'm sort of up for it now tbh, fucking fed up with bad decisions and the tedium that follows after the game. Trial it in a few preseason tournaments, see what happens. I would be up for it - but only for super quantifiable cut and dry things - like offside technology. It would annoy me even more if an in-game review system was introduced and decisions were still incorrect. Retrospective bans/lifting of bans based on N-O forum consensus would be alreet too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 As has been mentioned numerous times, there are already a ton of stoppages in a regular "90 minute" football game that a few replays of the most divisive incidents (which may not even occur in every single game being played) will hardly turn the game into test cricket. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I don't think the video replays would work because a lot of the time in football the decisions are a matter of opinion. If you have a TMO or video ref up in the stands looking at replays they're going to side with the referee unless its an obvious mistake Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I don't reckon that there would be many issues with it tbh, give teams 3 reviews per game, allow the fourth officials have access to a TV and it'd only take about a minute to find out if something was called incorrectly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I don't like the idea of reviews at all, the idea should be to get as many decisions right as possible. TBH I'd be in favour of a constant video official or two, who just watch the match on video and talk to the referee all the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I like the challenges idea. 2 per game to be used whenever, 4th official decides. No decision possible in 30 seconds then a neutral decision is made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 One thing it'd be in favour of is, like in Rugby, being able to hear the refs, so people better understand what was going through their mind when making a decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Challenges Can you imagine the likes of Pulis using that on spurious stuff just to timewaste as the clock runs down. Would make me want go postal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Challenges Can you imagine the likes of Pulis using that on spurious stuff just to timewaste as the clock runs down. Would make me want go postal. So fuck? That would be his choice, everyone should have a chance to challenge an obvious shit call basically. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I like it how it is. Stop trying to ruin it with silly stuff. Wrong decisions are part of the game, from grass roots to the highest level. Should be consistent across all levels at least. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I don't reckon that there would be many issues with it tbh, give teams 3 reviews per game, allow the fourth officials have access to a TV and it'd only take about a minute to find out if something was called incorrectly. It wouldn't be a minute though. It's certainly not always that quick in rugby or cricket. They watch the replays over and over, from different angles, rewinding and fastforwarding. It's nauseating. In football there's so much stuff that's down to interpretation, the video ref would be on for fucking ever. So you're then at the point where you probably have to take timekeeping out of the referee's hands and pause the clock. Which is a huge and fundamental change to the sport. I'm 100% against it. The only other thing I could possible see it at some point maybe working for is offsides, if they can develop a system which calls them immediately like they do for goal line stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Presume they'd stop the clock for challenges. It should be set at only one challenge per team per game IMO not to mess with the flow of the game. Any more than that and its open to being abused Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 So limit the time for a decision, 30 seconds. If the ref can't decide then a decision that impedes neither team is made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 Unless its instant technology its a slippery slope IMO. Rugby is absolutely unwatchable because of all this nonsense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I like it how it is. Stop trying to ruin it with silly stuff. Wrong decisions are part of the game, from grass roots to the highest level. Should be consistent across all levels at least. This would be my preferred option TBH, just accept that referees aren't perfect. And review footage afterwards for diving. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I don't reckon that there would be many issues with it tbh, give teams 3 reviews per game, allow the fourth officials have access to a TV and it'd only take about a minute to find out if something was called incorrectly. It wouldn't be a minute though. It's certainly not always that quick in rugby or cricket. They watch the replays over and over, from different angles, rewinding and fastforwarding. It's nauseating. In football there's so much stuff that's down to interpretation, the video ref would be on for fucking ever. So you're then at the point where you probably have to take timekeeping out of the referee's hands and pause the clock. Which is a huge and fundamental change to the sport. I'm 100% against it. The only other thing I could possible see it at some point maybe working for is offsides, if they can develop a system which calls them immediately like they do for goal line stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiled in Texas Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 One thing it'd be in favour of is, like in Rugby, being able to hear the refs, so people better understand what was going through their mind when making a decision. I like that idea, but because it would also broadcast what the players were saying to the referee, and thereby curtail their wining/complaining Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted October 30, 2015 Share Posted October 30, 2015 I would have time to wait thirty seconds for a review to not have Colo sent off against Sunderland. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandamninator Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 I don't reckon that there would be many issues with it tbh, give teams 3 reviews per game, allow the fourth officials have access to a TV and it'd only take about a minute to find out if something was called incorrectly. It wouldn't be a minute though. It's certainly not always that quick in rugby or cricket. They watch the replays over and over, from different angles, rewinding and fastforwarding. It's nauseating. In football there's so much stuff that's down to interpretation, the video ref would be on for fucking ever. So you're then at the point where you probably have to take timekeeping out of the referee's hands and pause the clock. Which is a huge and fundamental change to the sport. I'm 100% against it. The only other thing I could possible see it at some point maybe working for is offsides, if they can develop a system which calls them immediately like they do for goal line stuff. It used to be much quicker and less used because they could only check the actual try itself, now they can go back to shit that happened 30 seconds and 7 phases earlier. It's all about balance, which the IRB fucked up on despite having it right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now