Dave Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Looking forward to reading about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Toon Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 https://www.nufc.co.uk/news/latest-news/headlines-from-the-fans-forum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 New sponsor Totally forgot W*nga was up at the end of this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Hope the new sponsor isn't involved with betting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 The club explained that members of the senior team had paid a productive visit to Celtic Park to explore the merits of safe standing, but that it will await the outcome of current pilots and legislative discussions before further investigating viability. Wonder which top flight club in England will be the first to dare try it. Can imagine there will be a shitstorm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 The club explained that members of the senior team had paid a productive visit to Celtic Park to explore the merits of safe standing, but that it will await the outcome of current pilots and legislative discussions before further investigating viability. Wonder which top flight club in England will be the first to dare try it. Can imagine there will be a shitstorm. Are they allowed to do it at the moment in the PL? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 More difficult to get government on board as will need a change in legislation, not exactly going to be near the top of the queue for govt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 The club explained that members of the senior team had paid a productive visit to Celtic Park to explore the merits of safe standing, but that it will await the outcome of current pilots and legislative discussions before further investigating viability. Wonder which top flight club in England will be the first to dare try it. Can imagine there will be a shitstorm. Are they allowed to do it at the moment in the PL? nope, ditto championship not sure about league 1/2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Safe standing will come, just a matter of when. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Hope the new sponsor isn't involved with betting. Won't be Greggs or Ginsters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted February 25, 2017 Share Posted February 25, 2017 Hope the new sponsor isn't involved with betting. Won't be Greggs or Ginsters. why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 https://www.nufc.co.uk/media/29627/fans-forum-minutes-february-2017.pdf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Nothing much in them except - Wonga ends but Puma continues at the end of the season - SJP naming rights not part of new discussions - New shirt sponsor deal will compare favourably with EPL teams Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Hope the new sponsor isn't involved with betting. Won't be Greggs or Ginsters. Gregg's heir has just been found guilty of molesting young boys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 https://www.nufc.co.uk/media/29627/fans-forum-minutes-february-2017.pdf All in all, pretty positive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Hope the new sponsor isn't involved with betting. Won't be Greggs or Ginsters. Gregg's heir has just been found guilty of molesting young boys. Probably more suited to our local rivals then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Toon Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 In the usual dose of hand picked questions given the obvious or parliamentary answer, one thing stuck out for me. This reply. The club explained that it does not need, or intend, to sell key players in order to fund arrivals. However it confirmed that any funds received during the summer would contribute to the overall transfer budget. That doesn't say that any funds raised can be used on top of an agreed transfer budget. To me it reeks of the Summer we just had in that our spend was well documented with the recoup hidden behind the propaganda. Could well be another net profit ahead if we go up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 No chance we will have a net profit this summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Toon Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 No chance we will have a net profit this summer. Maybe not but a £80m spend isn't £80m if you sell £40m worth of players to do so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cort Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 "The club outlined that it is in a long-term relationship with its kit manufacturer, PUMA. The club also confirmed that kits had been selected for next season, with an order to be placed shortly on kits for the following 2018/19 campaign, due to the required lead times." This interests me because this suggests that it wasn't the Premier League stopping us from having full stripes on the back like we do this season but just Puma being difficult. Hopefully they've seen the positive reaction from this season and continue with this - with Wonga gone, shirt sales could be through the roof. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 The least interesting fans forum minutes imo. Literally nothing achieved or noted (that wasn't already known) other than the bogs might be getting a lick of paint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 "The club outlined that it is in a long-term relationship with its kit manufacturer, PUMA. The club also confirmed that kits had been selected for next season, with an order to be placed shortly on kits for the following 2018/19 campaign, due to the required lead times." This interests me because this suggests that it wasn't the Premier League stopping us from having full stripes on the back like we do this season but just Puma being difficult. Hopefully they've seen the positive reaction from this season and continue with this - with Wonga gone, shirt sales could be through the roof. Not if the shirt they have gone for has no back stripes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 In the usual dose of hand picked questions given the obvious or parliamentary answer, one thing stuck out for me. This reply. The club explained that it does not need, or intend, to sell key players in order to fund arrivals. However it confirmed that any funds received during the summer would contribute to the overall transfer budget. That doesn't say that any funds raised can be used on top of an agreed transfer budget. To me it reeks of the Summer we just had in that our spend was well documented with the recoup hidden behind the propaganda. Could well be another net profit ahead if we go up. No it doesn't because that wouldn't have answered the question which was... "Bryn Tennant (BT) asked if the club would need to sell players in the summer in order to bring others in." ....which it does answer. Does say elsewhere that discussions on budget are ungoing which puts doubt to the idea that Rafa had specific assurances in his contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now