Flip Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. :lol: It's a clear dive. Don't prontonise me nees. I'm not the only one that doesn't think it's a clear dive. For me it's not a dive at all actually. He throws himself to the ground dramatically, but he's going down no matter how you spin it since the West Ham player runs into him from behind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsley Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Not convinced that's a dive. Don't think it was a penalty either mind. Clear dive, you don't go that high up in the air by a tackle or being tripped. Well there's a difference between exaggerating contact and diving. I thought that there was a tangle of the legs and that, along with the pressure from the defender, put him off balance. Not saying it was a foul by Ogbonna either by the way, rather a fairly innocuous coming-together in the penalty box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. Wot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. It's a clear dive, his only intention was to jump into the defender and bounce off him to con the referee into giving a penalty. Correct decision. He's ahead of the West Ham player ffs. How does he jump into the defender? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Not convinced that's a dive. Don't think it was a penalty either mind. Clear dive, you don't go that high up in the air by a tackle or being tripped. Well there's a difference between exaggerating contact and diving. I thought that there was a tangle of the legs and that, along with the pressure from the defender, put him off balance. Not saying it was a foul by Ogbonna either by the way, rather a fairly innocuous coming-together in the penalty box. This x 1000. IMO at least. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. "Put his body infront of the West Ham player" ffs So fucking Brazilian. Let's just say he jumped into the WH player, dangerous play, straight red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. :lol: It's a clear dive. Don't prontonise me nees. I'm not the only one that doesn't think it's a clear dive. For me it's not a dive at all actually. He throws himself to the ground dramatically, but he's going down no matter how you spin it since the West Ham player runs into him from behind. Only the West Ham player doesn't run into him, he runs into the West Ham player to fake the foul and try and con the referee into giving a penalty = dive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Not convinced that's a dive. Don't think it was a penalty either mind. Clear dive, you don't go that high up in the air by a tackle or being tripped. Well there's a difference between exaggerating contact and diving. I thought that there was a tangle of the legs and that, along with the pressure from the defender, put him off balance. Not saying it was a foul by Ogbonna either by the way, rather a fairly innocuous coming-together in the penalty box. He caused the contact! It's diving if you throw your body into another person and fall over! Bunch of modern day football mugs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. :lol: It's a clear dive. Don't prontonise me nees. I'm not the only one that doesn't think it's a clear dive. For me it's not a dive at all actually. He throws himself to the ground dramatically, but he's going down no matter how you spin it since the West Ham player runs into him from behind. Only the West Ham player doesn't run into him, he runs into the West Ham player to fake the foul and try and con the referee into giving a penalty = dive. Exactly, just because there's contact doesn't mean it's not a dive/intention to con the ref. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. It's a clear dive, his only intention was to jump into the defender and bounce off him to con the referee into giving a penalty. Correct decision. He's ahead of the West Ham player ffs. How does he jump into the defender? To the side, obviously. If he was clearly in front of the player he could have just carried on and had a shot. He wasn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. "Put his body infront of the West Ham player" ffs So f***ing Brazilian. Let's just say he jumped into the WH player, dangerous play, straight red. Don't make this a thing about nationality. I'm sitting with bunch of Swedes who agree. Commentator said the same, really harsh decision from the ref. Thats not a dive ffs. He clearly exaggerates, but it's not a dive at all. He puts his body infront of the West Ham player, who runs into him. Awful decision to give a foul against him and a yellow in my opinion. :lol: It's a clear dive. Don't prontonise me nees. I'm not the only one that doesn't think it's a clear dive. For me it's not a dive at all actually. He throws himself to the ground dramatically, but he's going down no matter how you spin it since the West Ham player runs into him from behind. Only the West Ham player doesn't run into him, he runs into the West Ham player to fake the foul and try and con the referee into giving a penalty = dive. I definitely don't agree with this. But each to their own. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Not convinced that's a dive. Don't think it was a penalty either mind. Clear dive, you don't go that high up in the air by a tackle or being tripped. Well there's a difference between exaggerating contact and diving. I thought that there was a tangle of the legs and that, along with the pressure from the defender, put him off balance. Not saying it was a foul by Ogbonna either by the way, rather a fairly innocuous coming-together in the penalty box. He caused the contact! It's diving if you throw your body into another person and fall over! Bunch of modern day football mugs. This. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Brave call by the ref. On the replay it clearly looks like he leaves his leg into the defender and goes down straight away. Total stupidity considering the stakes. Imagine if his absence is what loses them the league? West Ham have bossed the game so far, could easily get a result here. Can second yellows be challenged? I know a straight red being overturned is quite common. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norseman Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Seemed to me a blatant attempt to con the referee into giving a pen. The contact seemed to be after he jumped theatrically into the air. Kudos to the ref. Correct and ballsy decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 West Ham don't seem overly arsed about taking advantage of the extra man here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Brave call by the ref. On the replay it clearly looks like he leaves his leg into the defender and goes down straight away. Total stupidity considering the stakes. Imagine if his absence is what loses them the league? West Ham have bossed the game so far, could easily get a result here. Can second yellows be challenged? I know a straight red being overturned is quite common. Yellows can only be contested on the grounds of mistaken identity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 I can only assume these apologist fucks haven't seen the angle from the goalline, where you can see him hop inside, miles away from the ball, purely to cause contact. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Leicester lucky to have Kante. Playing 11v11 now with a man off and him on the pitch Guy is everywhere always. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 I can only assume these apologist f***s haven't seen the angle from the goalline, where you can see him hop inside, miles away from the ball, purely to cause contact. I've seen every angle possible and can clearly see the ball right there. But clearly we both have a different definition of dive and miles as well for that matter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 You probably have the Brazilian definition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 You probably have the Brazilian definition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 It was an atrocious dive like, there's really no argument to be had. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Just looked again, clear cheating. Totally unnatural step into the defender then throws himself to the ground. Referee got it spot on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 West Ham not interested, strange. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 You probably have the Brazilian definition. How about the one for miles? Is that the Brazilian as well? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts