Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It always looked a bit dodgy when none of the Man U players even appealed it, Gini got fouled loads in the box on the night and it wasn't even brought up for conversation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bring up the law then.

There's stuff on it to do with position of arm. 

Having your arm horizontal in the air when challenging for a ball is suicide imo

 

To be fair, the stuff it says in relation to the position of the arm is that "the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an infringement". Along with the other stuff it is implying you shouldn't take the position of the hand into consideration.

 

You could argue his hand is moving towards the ball I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I thought, still think, he was just reaching to locate the man he was meant to be marking. That is why his arm was there, not to aid his jump, nor to deliberately block the ball. If position makes a difference -- natural unnatural, high-low-a bit too camp -- (I don't know, and frankly can't be arsed to find out) then he was foolish to risk it. If the ref has to guess intent, based on the players movement/behaviour, then I think he's got it wrong, as he did for the Janmmat scything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I thought, still think, he was just reaching to locate the man he was meant to be marking. That is why his arm was there, not to aid his jump, nor to deliberately block the ball. If position makes a difference -- natural unnatural, high-low-a bit too camp -- (I don't know, and frankly can't be arsed to find out) then he was foolish to risk it. If the ref has to guess intent, based on the players movement/behaviour, then I think he's got it wrong, as he did for the Janmmat scything.

 

:thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I thought, still think, he was just reaching to locate the man he was meant to be marking. That is why his arm was there, not to aid his jump, nor to deliberately block the ball. If position makes a difference -- natural unnatural, high-low-a bit too camp -- (I don't know, and frankly can't be arsed to find out) then he was foolish to risk it. If the ref has to guess intent, based on the players movement/behaviour, then I think he's got it wrong, as he did for the Janmmat scything.

Kind of, I saw it that he was thinking of stopping their progress, man or ball, whichever. I still think penalty was the correct call after watching slo-mo's and numerous angles. How the ref came to that conclusion in real time is different though, tbf same goes for our given penalty. The challenge on Janmaat and Fellaini still being on the pitch at the end were still disgraceful though.
Link to post
Share on other sites

It looked like Mbemba knew he was in trouble and was trying to make himself big. His sole intention may not have been to handle the ball, but there was a clear risk of that happening. On another day, he might have got away with it, but a pen was a fair decision.

 

The worse call was Colback being denied a pen. It was the sort of challenge that would be a free kick anywhere but in the area. The defender took hold of him and that affected his balance when he was trying to shoot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looked like Mbemba knew he was in trouble and was trying to make himself big. His sole intention may not have been to handle the ball, but there was a clear risk of that happening. On another day, he might have got away with it, but a pen was a fair decision.

 

The worse call was Colback being denied a pen. It was the sort of challenge that would be a free kick anywhere but in the area. The defender took hold of him and that affected his balance when he was trying to shoot on the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looked like Mbemba knew he was in trouble and was trying to make himself big. His sole intention may not have been to handle the ball, but there was a clear risk of that happening. On another day, he might have got away with it, but a pen was a fair decision.

 

I don't think players have a responsibility to avoid handball at all costs though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looked like Mbemba knew he was in trouble and was trying to make himself big. His sole intention may not have been to handle the ball, but there was a clear risk of that happening. On another day, he might have got away with it, but a pen was a fair decision.

 

I don't think players have a responsibility to avoid handball at all costs though.

 

Well yeah, this is a grey area, and generally speaking defenders tend to get judged too harshly on this. Too many pens get given in this kind of situation.

 

But Mbemba was deliberately spreading himself, and that tips the scales IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think handball should be reserved for when players blatantly get a deliberate advantage by moving the ball with their hands. When there's so much doubt about it I think that tells you it's a very questionable decision. It's one of my football pet hates, the handball debate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think handball should be reserved for when players blatantly get a deliberate advantage by moving the ball with their hands. When there's so much doubt about it I think that tells you it's a very questionable decision. It's one of my football pet hates, the handball debate.

wouldn't players then make themselves big so to speak and claim their arms were out before the ball was played. I get your point though, it is a gray area.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This handball/pen issue is so convoluted and confusing. In my mind, anytime the ball touches a hand/arm in the penalty area which changes the direction of the ball, it should be a penalty. Deliberate or not. This is the reason it shouldn't be a penalty if a ball strikes an arm that is in front of the head/chest/down by the leg, as long as the ball's direction doesn't change had the arm not been there.

 

In this case, I don't believe Mbemba deliberately handballed it, but his outstretched arm changed the direction of the ball, and should therefore be a penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you'd have forwards shooting the ball for people's hands?

don't be silly.

 

If any redirection of the ball by a hand is a penalty, you think it wouldn't enter into players' minds to flick the ball up onto someone's arm if they were in a tight spot?

thought you were replying to me. Sorry.
Link to post
Share on other sites

In this case, I don't believe Mbemba deliberately handballed it, but his outstretched arm changed the direction of the ball, and should therefore be a penalty.

 

If you believe it wasn't deliberate, then you believe it's not a penalty. By definition.

 

Oh yes by the current rules. I just meant that if they adjusted it the way I've explained, it would eliminate a lot of the guessing and controversy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this case, I don't believe Mbemba deliberately handballed it, but his outstretched arm changed the direction of the ball, and should therefore be a penalty.

 

If you believe it wasn't deliberate, then you believe it's not a penalty. By definition.

 

Oh yes by the current rules. I just meant that if they adjusted it the way I've explained, it would eliminate a lot of the guessing and controversy.

 

Oh right, got you. Sometimes people misunderstand the 'guidance on deciding if it's deliberate' to be 'factors that can make it a penalty', where in fact they're slightly different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...