Jump to content

Jonjo Shelvey (now playing for Burnley)


Recommended Posts

Struggling with this one. How is calling an Arab, an Arab racist. As far as i'm aware most Arabs don't regard the name as an insult.

Mention race and your banned. Doesn't matter if it was a racist comment. ((Which it wasn't by definition.))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Struggling with this one. How is calling an Arab, an Arab racist. As far as i'm aware most Arabs don't regard the name as an insult.

 

Sticking 'fucking' in front of it then its an insult. The fact 'Arab' refers to a persons ethnicity/race/religion means together its a 'racist insult'. It's pretty simple stuff really, i'm struggling with how people can't understand it.  :huff:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The term 'Arab' isn't racist, but using it in a derogatory sense is. Such as 'Arab c***'.

 

Amazing that this still needs explaining.

 

It doesn't. The fact the definition of racism is being diluted virtually by the week is amazing. How long will it be before calling someone a 'Byker bastard' or 'Wallsend wanker' (no offence) is considered racist. And please, lets not pretend those who have climbed onto their 'high horse' have never uttered a racist comment at some point in their lives. Modern definition of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The term 'Arab' isn't racist, but using it in a derogatory sense is. Such as 'Arab c***'.

 

Amazing that this still needs explaining.

 

It doesn't. The fact the definition of racism is being diluted virtually by the week is amazing. How long will it be before calling someone a 'Byker b******' or 'Wallsend w*****' (no offence) is considered racist. And please, lets not pretend those who have climbed onto their 'high horse' have never uttered a racist comment at some point in their lives. Modern definition of course.

 

Byker or Wallsend is not a religion, culture or ethnicity. Hence why it wouldn't be racist.

 

There is no need to include a person's religion/culture/ethnicity in any insult, unless you are intending it to be racist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The term 'Arab' isn't racist, but using it in a derogatory sense is. Such as 'Arab c***'.

 

Amazing that this still needs explaining.

 

It doesn't. The fact the definition of racism is being diluted virtually by the week is amazing. How long will it be before calling someone a 'Byker bastard' or 'Wallsend wanker' (no offence) is considered racist. And please, lets not pretend those who have climbed onto their 'high horse' have never uttered a racist comment at some point in their lives. Modern definition of course.

 

I suggest you read the Equality Act 2010, strangely enough being from Byker or Wallsend isn't a protected characteristic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Literally can't believe this debate is being had in 2016.

Honestly I can only assume people are wilfully playing dim at this point because they 'don't think it's that bad'. Which is fair enough. I don't think Shelvey's a horrendous racist on the back of this either. I don't think calling someone an 'Arab prick' is the end of the world or out. It's not on, but we can move on from it.

 

It's quite obviously not just "calling an Arab an Arab" though, and the FA rules state that any abuse aimed at a player's ethnicity/religion/nationality is a 5 game minimum ban. Hence why it would also be a 5 game minimum ban for calling someone an "English cunt", or a "Mexican cunt", or a "Jap Cunt" if it was reported.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Literally can't believe this debate is being had in 2016.

Honestly I can only assume people are wilfully playing dim at this point because they 'don't think it's that bad'. Which is fair enough. I don't think Shelvey's a horrendous racist on the back of this either. I don't think calling someone an 'Arab prick' is the end of the world or out. It's not on, but we can move on from it.

 

It's quite obviously not just "calling an Arab an Arab" though, and the FA rules state that any abuse aimed at a player's ethnicity/religion/nationality is a 5 game minimum ban. Hence why it would also be a 5 game minimum ban for calling someone an "English cunt", or a "Mexican cunt", or a "Jap Cunt" if it was reported.

 

 

 

Aye, this is basically my view.  I don't think he's a racist and that what he has said is racist as such but he's broken the rules and we have to accept the outcome of it, the FA are not picking on us etc, they were given a complaint and have dealt with it. 

 

What i will say, his defense could had been better organised in terms how it was presented to the FA.  Also he needs to learn to keep his gob shut at times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've actually been through this before (probably many times) :lol: :

 

Since when did 'Cockney' become a derogatory term anyway?

 

Since you put it before "bastard", same way as lots of other stuff? "e.g. "black" or "white" aren't derogatory terms on their own.

:lol:

 

"There's a black man standing in the hallway."

 

vs

 

"There's a fat black bastard standing in the hallway."

 

I don't even know why this needs to be explained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Literally can't believe this debate is being had in 2016.

Honestly I can only assume people are wilfully playing dim at this point because they 'don't think it's that bad'. Which is fair enough. I don't think Shelvey's a horrendous racist on the back of this either. I don't think calling someone an 'Arab prick' is the end of the world or out. It's not on, but we can move on from it.

 

It's quite obviously not just "calling an Arab an Arab" though, and the FA rules state that any abuse aimed at a player's ethnicity/religion/nationality is a 5 game minimum ban. Hence why it would also be a 5 game minimum ban for calling someone an "English cunt", or a "Mexican cunt", or a "Jap Cunt" if it was reported.

 

 

 

Aye, this is basically my view.  I don't think he's a racist and that what he has said is racist as such but he's broken the rules and we have to accept the outcome of it, the FA are not picking on us etc, they were given a complaint and have dealt with it. 

 

What i will say, his defense could had been better organised in terms how it was presented to the FA.  Also he needs to learn to keep his gob shut at times.

Honsetly I think this, combined with his red rescinded from the Forrest game, he's massively lucky to have only got 5 games. I was expecting a combination of around 10. I don't believe it, but I can see why other clubs think the FA favour us (like we would with the top Prem clubs).
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Literally can't believe this debate is being had in 2016.

Honestly I can only assume people are wilfully playing dim at this point because they 'don't think it's that bad'. Which is fair enough. I don't think Shelvey's a horrendous racist on the back of this either. I don't think calling someone an 'Arab prick' is the end of the world or out. It's not on, but we can move on from it.

 

It's quite obviously not just "calling an Arab an Arab" though, and the FA rules state that any abuse aimed at a player's ethnicity/religion/nationality is a 5 game minimum ban. Hence why it would also be a 5 game minimum ban for calling someone an "English cunt", or a "Mexican cunt", or a "Jap Cunt" if it was reported.

 

 

 

Aye, this is basically my view.  I don't think he's a racist and that what he has said is racist as such but he's broken the rules and we have to accept the outcome of it, the FA are not picking on us etc, they were given a complaint and have dealt with it. 

 

What i will say, his defense could had been better organised in terms how it was presented to the FA.  Also he needs to learn to keep his gob shut at times.

Honsetly I think this, combined with his red rescinded from the Forrest game, he's massively lucky to have only got 5 games. I was expecting a combination of around 10. I don't believe it, but I can see why other clubs think the FA favour us (like we would with the top Prem clubs).

 

Yeah, that's a good point.  I bet the club were worried after his sending off v Forest he would be missing up to 2 months worth of games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Literally can't believe this debate is being had in 2016.

 

Oh I totally can.

 

http://drop.ndtv.com/albums/NEWS/brexit/000_cb87i.jpg

 

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/GTY-trump-supporters-jef-161101_12x5_1600.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...