Froggy Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said: A goal involvement for an attacking midfielder every 206 minutes and £50m is "not even close to enough" Not saying he's a bad player or he doesn't have potential, but every time I see him he looks very average. How much is Gordon worth? Genuine question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Garnacho will be great in a less dysfunctional team. 50m is a fair price. He’s just got the most annoying face in football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Froggy said: How much is Gordon worth? Genuine question. No idea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago We signed him for 45 million and he's become a much better player since then, so there's your starting point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikky Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Froggy said: How much is Gordon worth? Genuine question. Upwards of 80m if Garnacho is going to go for 55m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Just now, Mikky said: Upwards of 80m if Garnacho is going to go for 55m Same amount of goal contributions this season as Garnacho though, and Garnacho has barely been used since November. He's also 3.5 years younger. Also won trophies, including scoring in the final. Thoughts? Using the logic on here, if Gordon is worth £80m, Garnacho should be £120m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Does not starting games increase ones value? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Village Idiot Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago FWIW, we are being strongly linked with Rashford atm, although on loan. We do need a striker because we depend way too much on Lewy, but I'm not sure Rashford is it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Trust me, he's not, Barca are better off going for someone like Wissa Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 10 minutes ago, SEMTEX said: Does not starting games increase ones value? It does when you play for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Village Idiot said: FWIW, we are being strongly linked with Rashford atm, although on loan. We do need a striker because we depend way too much on Lewy, but I'm not sure Rashford is it. Rashford is no striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Froggy said: Same amount of goal contributions this season as Garnacho though, and Garnacho has barely been used since November. He's also 3.5 years younger. Also won trophies, including scoring in the final. Thoughts? Using the logic on here, if Gordon is worth £80m, Garnacho should be £120m. AG was shite at the start of the season and will finish with more goal contributions, a higher league placing after 38 games and a League Cup to his name. Maybe not the last one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Froggy said: Same amount of goal contributions this season as Garnacho though Almost half of his total returns came against Barnsley by the way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo123 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 55 minutes ago, Froggy said: Isak was pure shite when I watched him last as well. I'm telling on ya. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I really like Garnacho in theory, with a gameplan and some coaching he has everything. Based on mainly highlights, admittedly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said: AG was shite at the start of the season and will finish with more goal contributions, a higher league placing after 38 games and a League Cup to his name. Maybe not the last one. Garnacho going to finish with a Europa League, FA Cup and a Scudetto to his name. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, Shearergol said: £50m??? I've obviously not watched him closely enough. Cartel tax. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Garnacho is worth £50M. No idea what some of you lot are saying tbh. He has a lot of potential and is still a bairn. I bet Napoli end up making a profit on him too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Menace said: Garnacho is worth £50M. No idea what some of you lot are saying tbh. He has a lot of potential and is still a bairn. I bet Napoli end up making a profit on him too. Think Garnach is good. Dont know if he’s quick or technically good enough to make a profit over £50m for the buying club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago Just want to say, I wanted us in for Amad last season. Excelling in the Championship at a young age is a great predictor for PL suitability. Shame it’s not true of ‘our’ Armstrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Menace said: Garnacho is worth £50M. No idea what some of you lot are saying tbh. He has a lot of potential and is still a bairn. I bet Napoli end up making a profit on him too. I think the issue is that someone thinks he's worth considerably more than £50 million Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Froggy said: Rashford is no striker. I beg to differ, he's been on strike for about 3 years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said: I think the issue is that someone thinks he's worth considerably more than £50 million That's debatable. Bradley Barcola was around £40M and I would say he's better than Garnacho currently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Menace said: That's debatable. Bradley Barcola was around £40M and I would say he's better than Garnacho currently. Well exactly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cf Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago I don't think many clubs are going to be spending £50m on potential these days unless they feel that the potential is elite level. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now