Jump to content

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Lotus said:

Tonali has always been a player who tries high reward/high risk passes so he’s numbers have never looked anything special if completion rate is the only metric you’re using.

Tonali was sloppy in possession (in parts) irrespective yesterday.

 

 

Edited by Heron

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

Jesus fucking Christ, man. You are just a relentless downer.

 

Yeah, I know. I think I'm just a bit of a perfectionist with my opinions on football and enjoy picking things apart. And this place is where I like to share my thoughts. Would rather people pick out issues, if any, with what I'm saying. 

 

Like, am I right or wrong that Longstaff can only really play to the level he showed against Everton against lower quality opponents who allow lots of space? Wasn't Tonali's passing okay for the most part on Saturday, but he made some horrendous mistakes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, David Edgar said:

Like, am I right or wrong that Longstaff can only really play to the level he showed against Everton against lower quality opponents who allow lots of space? Wasn't Tonali's passing okay for the most part on Saturday, but he made some horrendous mistakes?

Longstaff consistently played to that level from the start for near enough a whole season a couple of years ago tbf. 

 

He really needs some confidence back in his game. Perhaps coming off the bench and putting some good appearances in from there can help him do that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, David Edgar said:

 

Yeah, I know. I think I'm just a bit of a perfectionist with my opinions on football and enjoy picking things apart. And this place is where I like to share my thoughts. Would rather people pick out issues, if any, with what I'm saying. 

 

Like, am I right or wrong that Longstaff can only really play to the level he showed against Everton against lower quality opponents who allow lots of space? Wasn't Tonali's passing okay for the most part on Saturday, but he made some horrendous mistakes?


Remember a game just over a year ago against PSG? Ring any bells? Are they just a poor, lower half PL side?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are kicking about the CL which is the plan it makes sense to keep Longstaff about given the HG measures, having to find players who are of a decent quality who will meet that will cost a fortune at a time when we could be looking at a lot of other markets. 

 

A squad does need a few players like Burn and Longstaff who are easy to maintain and keep a bit of identity about a group. 

 

A player coming on late in a game when others look tired and doing work that takes advantage of that isn't a negative. 

 

 

Edited by JEToon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just now, Pilko said:

Enjoyed his podcast appearance, he's a nice lad and clearly appreciates the position he's in. 


Many things you could never criticise him for. He tries his best, he loves the club, he knows how lucky he is. Have to respect the lad even though I’m a big critic of his play at times. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 01/10/2024 at 16:35, LFEE said:

Is it not worth it just to sell for a fee instead losing for a free?

 

What would you say is low?

He's almost 27. We would give him what? Another year? Maybe 2?

 

Anything between £5-10m would be a good fee for him. Is it worth keeping him for that?

 

The annoying thing, is we don't have a natural replacement for him lined up. Maybe we do give him another year, just so he can really start sharing minutes with Miley.

Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

He's almost 27. We would give him what? Another year? Maybe 2?

 

Anything between £5-10m would be a good fee for him. Is it worth keeping him for that?

 

The annoying thing, is we don't have a natural replacement for him lined up. Maybe we do give him another year, just so he can really start sharing minutes with Miley.

Sean's wages off the books probably outweighs keeping him around - regardless of any fee we might fetch. We should let him go thrive in the Championship, where he belongs in terms of his talent, and where he will excel.

 

Part of all of the invective he catches from fans is simply because he's being asked to shoulder more than he can handle, and its not fair to him, either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Upthemags said:

Sean's wages off the books probably outweighs keeping him around - regardless of any fee we might fetch. We should let him go thrive in the Championship, where he belongs in terms of his talent, and where he will excel.

 

Part of all of the invective he catches from fans is simply because he's being asked to shoulder more than he can handle, and its not fair to him, either.

 

He was a big part of a side that finished 4th and 7th in the PL respectively. I'd agree with you if you say that we need better but saying he's championship standard is pure bullshit. 

 

He'd be a solid player for any lower tier PL side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we had a kid taking his place then no bother but the lack of a replacement means you go out and buy one then you do the math 3 more years of him and a chance to get a fee at some point in that period or he walks on a free and we go out and spend money. Home grown pure profit. 

 

I don't rate him or want him around the first 11 but in a psr world he cannot be allowed to go for nothing even if he isn't up to standard. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, STM said:

 

He was a big part of a side that finished 4th and 7th in the PL respectively. I'd agree with you if you say that we need better but saying he's championship standard is pure bullshit. 

 

He'd be a solid player for any lower tier PL side.

It's a pity his finishing is so shit as he does have a knack of getting in goalscoring positions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

but lavishes praise on Bruce. 

Found that really weird, when I swear previously he'd opened up about his mental health struggles during that time and the obvious correlation between Bruce being there. Still, enjoyed the interview, he comes across as such a nice guy. I feel bad for giving him shit in the match threads, but I do think he's got a place in this side as a useful squad player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Comes across really well on the podcast but lavishes praise on Bruce. 

“Lavishes” might be overstating it a bit like. I’d say he was complementary in a ‘no need for me to talk bad about him’ way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SteV said:

“Lavishes” might be overstating it a bit like. I’d say he was complementary in a ‘no need for me to talk bad about him’ way.


Nah, he definitely says he was a really good manager and we wouldn’t be where we are now if he hadn’t kept us up. Unnecessary and weird. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:


Nah, he definitely says he was a really good manager and we wouldn’t be where we are now if he hadn’t kept us up. Unnecessary and weird. 


Not unless he genuinely feels that way and got on well with him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...