Miercoles Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 41 minutes ago, ExiledGeordie said: Was it Longstaff who cleaned him out? 😂 Those intangibles again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samptime29 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Can't believe some people are saying it's a red. They both put their head in. The slow mo on twitter is very conclusive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 So stupid from him to even risk it. Insane VAR didn't overturn the ref's decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 3 hours ago, The Butcher said: Fucking idiot Massively ironic that you inhabit planet soft cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 2 hours ago, madras said: What triggered it was the way Brereton Diaz charged into Schar after the whistle for a foul nowhere near them. That was a yellow and his carry onafter was another yellow I thought Diaz went charging into him with his head down - didn't look a red from what I saw Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 It was a harsh red but he was fucking stupid to even put his head there and risk it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christ Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 (edited) Never a red card man. It wouldn’t have even been a talking point on MotD if not for Diaz’s histrionics. It’s the sort of clash that’ll happen dozens of times up and down the leagues over the course of the weekend. The hope the scruffy cunt snaps his leg in two. Edited August 17 by christ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Might be a bearded chin thing but did anyone else think Brereton's jaw's constantly chaaaawing? Kids on the gear Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 He reacted and took the bait that Diaz was offering, it's his own fault tbbh. Obviously Diaz's behaviour is disgraceful but he got the exact reaction from Schar that he was looking for. No idea how much contact was made but if Diaz stays on his feet it's a joint bollocking and a booking each at worst. Once they slow it down and look at it they're never overturning it and I don't even want to discuss the possibility of successfully appealing it, there's no chance whatsoever Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 16 minutes ago, gbandit said: I agree that it’s not remotely violent in reality and didn’t cause any damage. It’s a disgusting overreaction from Diaz. However, that head movement towards an opposing player has been a red for decades even with no proper contact Except all the times it hasn't resulted in a red card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 1 minute ago, Skeletor said: Except all the times it hasn't resulted in a red card. Yeah, well it might not have been given every single time but it has been given a ton of times for decades Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Just now, gbandit said: Yeah, well it might not have been given every single time but it has been given a ton of times for decades Selective red carding. Like when Pawson has been paid off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Just now, Skeletor said: Selective red carding. Like when Pawson has been paid off. I wouldn’t have given it as a red, it’s a joke. However, it’s impossible to argue against it or get it overturned as they can argue there was at least some intent Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Just now, gbandit said: I wouldn’t have given it as a red, it’s a joke. However, it’s impossible to argue against it or get it overturned as they can argue there was at least some intent Much worse to shove someone over when play is already stopped. That is violent conduct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 If BBD doesn't go down, I doubt either even get a yellow. Best thing to do is just mock him for being an absolute greasy little weapon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza ladra Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 No chance Schär's red is reversed. Maybe give Diaz one on review? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vexred Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Be interesting to see if we appeal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Just now, gazza ladra said: No chance Schär's red is reversed. Maybe give Diaz one on review? Probably more of a punishment if he plays judging by his performance today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 25 minutes ago, gbandit said: I agree that it’s not remotely violent in reality and didn’t cause any damage. It’s a disgusting overreaction from Diaz. However, that head movement towards an opposing player has been a red for decades even with no proper contact Yeah, that's why my initial reaction was anger at Schar. If you make head contact with someone while facing off, you should expect to be sent off based on what I've seen of football over the last couple of decades - and you should expect loads of players to go down to make sure you do. Not saying it's right but I reckon it's typically how it plays out, or at least often enough that it's a very silly thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Attempting to get others sent off like that is just rotten behavior and that is what the refs need to sort out. The rules need to be sorted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 21 minutes ago, Interpolic said: Massively ironic that you inhabit planet soft cunt. A knaa. It's so soft, but it's a red card every day of the week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjohnson Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Softest of soft sendings off, but once the refs look over it Diaz will get sod all for the rest of the season now. He's marked his card as a diving soft git and it will cost them long term Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fountain Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 1 hour ago, Aiston said: So stupid from him to even risk it. Insane VAR didn't overturn the ref's decision. This, never a red but don't do anything which might get you into bother Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 (edited) 2 hours ago, samptime29 said: Can't believe some people are saying it's a red. They both put their head in. The slow mo on twitter is very conclusive. Seeing it in real time - was never a red. Diaz was the instigator. Edited August 17 by duo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted August 17 Share Posted August 17 Any chance he gets a reduced ban if we appeal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now