Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In a bizarre sense, Bruce not playing him might have saved on some mileage further down the line. Hopefully he's got a couple of top years left in the tank and then a couple of squad years after that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, andycap said:

For now botman has the potential to be better. 

Botman’s already played nearly twice as many games as Woodgate. Schar has played approaching three times as many. Both better in my book: quality and utility (QxU statistic I’ve apparently just made up!). 
Are you having that @STM

 

 

Edited by Coffee_Johnny

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Botman’s already played nearly twice as many games as Woodgate. Schar has played approaching three times as many. Both better in my book: quality and utility (QxU statistic I’ve apparently just made up!). 
Are you having that @STM

 

 

 

Schar has a rick in him so woodgate is still top dog at the minute. He commanded the whole back four made shit players actually look good. Botman looks like he's cut from the same cloth. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, andycap said:

Schar has a rick in him so woodgate is still top dog at the minute. He commanded the whole back four made shit players actually look good. Botman looks like he's cut from the same cloth. 

I saw most of Woodgate’s 28 games—well all the home ones inc Europe and a few away, he was class act no doubt. But QxU Andy, it’s a thing! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Botman’s already played nearly twice as many games as Woodgate

 

That's an absolutely insane stat.

 

Woodgate was excellent, I had a season ticket then myself, but the brevity of his tenure here should surely preclude him being quite so high in people's all-time lists. Most of us watched at best a dozen of his games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woodgate was surprisingly quick aswell. Cannot remember anyone out pacing him in a foot race. A Leader that couldn't be replaced aswell and when he played I felt we would be fine at the back considering we never had great defenders under Robson. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said:

Botman’s already played nearly twice as many games as Woodgate. Schar has played approaching three times as many. Both better in my book: quality and utility (QxU statistic I’ve apparently just made up!). 
Are you having that @STM

 

 

 

 

Woodgate will never win the award for nostalgia because of his injuries, his departure and some comments IIRC.

 

However, Woodgate was the real deal. He had everything, besides a body made of playdough. Pace, strength, reading of the game, calmness on the ball. He was class.

 

Botman will eclipse him... very quickly. He's not as quick as Woodgate but he matches him everywhere else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MrRaspberryJam said:


Aaron Hughes was better than them all. 

 

I tell you what, I know you are joking but Hughes had loads of great attributes, he just didn't have the physical dominance.

 

He's another player we should have never let go. Would have had him over the years of Boumsong and Bramble etc. Also ended up captain of Fulham and NI IIRC. Great player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...