Jump to content

Women's Football


54

Recommended Posts

Guest Open_C

If you’re watching 40 different replays to verify minimal contact then things f***ed like :lol:

 

:thup: aye, exactly this. It's fucked the immediacy of the game, it's awful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't VAR supposed to be for "clear and obvious" decisions? That was so marginal it was unreal.

 

This offsides business is absolutely wank. No advantage gained whatsoever.

 

 

If it’s offside, it’s offside, should there be an advantage? Would be like goal line technology just deciding it’s a goal if 90% of the ball crosses the line.

The whole of the ball over the whole of the line. :lol: Offside should be the same.

 

That’s not the law though.

 

You're comparing chalk and cheese anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chopey

Black, white, rich, poor, male or female, England in a semi....blow it.  :lol:

 

From what I've read in an article today I don't think there's many of these World cup players do that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't VAR supposed to be for "clear and obvious" decisions? That was so marginal it was unreal.

 

This offsides business is absolutely wank. No advantage gained whatsoever.

 

 

If it’s offside, it’s offside, should there be an advantage? Would be like goal line technology just deciding it’s a goal if 90% of the ball crosses the line.

The whole of the ball over the whole of the line. :lol: Offside should be the same.

 

That’s not the law though.

 

You're comparing chalk and cheese anyway.

 

Not really? Offside law was used correctly. Can’t just ignore it if it’s ‘marginal’ the same way you couldn’t just give a goal if the vast majority of the ball was in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't VAR supposed to be for "clear and obvious" decisions? That was so marginal it was unreal.

 

This offsides business is absolutely wank. No advantage gained whatsoever.

 

 

If it’s offside, it’s offside, should there be an advantage? Would be like goal line technology just deciding it’s a goal if 90% of the ball crosses the line.

The whole of the ball over the whole of the line. :lol: Offside should be the same.

 

That’s not the law though.

I know but I'm saying I'm of the opinion that it should be. I think the game would be better for it.

I don't want every single decision to be absolutely perfect, especially if it takes several minutes and 50 replays to determine whether something was or wasn't. Goal-line technology - yes. Clear and obvious errors - yes. Really subjective/too close to call decisions - hell no.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...