Jump to content

Allan Saint-Maximin (now playing for Fenerbahce, on loan from Al-Ahli)


Recommended Posts

Should have won a penalty. 

8 minutes ago, Inferior Acuña said:

Every commentator saying he went down too dramatically and that's why he didn't get it - I don't see it. The fall is real, and he's lifting his arms and screaming to say it's a foul, not to act like he's been shot.

I will totally understand this in non-VAR games, but the idiots have a chance to rewatch it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clear penalty, outrageous decision, I think he’s now getting that kind of reputation and it is going against him. He was his usual frustrating self and at times it was a very one man show type of performance, but he was our main threat and did put a defensive shift in, he played for the team today. It’s up to Howe to get him to perform in the correct attacking way that also helps out the defence, but doesn’t make him a spent force in doing so. Do that and it’s half the battle. I was encouraged he sacrificed aspects of his natural game today for the team though.

 

 

Edited by HTT II

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Inferior Acuña said:

Every commentator saying he went down too dramatically and that's why he didn't get it - I don't see it. The fall is real, and he's lifting his arms and screaming to say it's a foul, not to act like he's been shot.

 

The guy caught him as he went past. Unless he was already diving (he wasn't) then legally there's no other decision you can give than a pen. Although I fully expect some cunt of a TV consultant ref to try to justify it in the next couple of days. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TRon said:

 

The guy caught him as he went past. Unless he was already diving (he wasn't) then legally there's no other decision you can give than a pen. Although I fully expect some cunt of a TV consultant ref to try to justify it in the next couple of days. 

You can understand the ref in the ground seeing it as iffy........not the VAR ref though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Inferior Acuña said:

Every commentator saying he went down too dramatically and that's why he didn't get it - I don't see it. The fall is real, and he's lifting his arms and screaming to say it's a foul, not to act like he's been shot.

 

I thought going down dramatically was essential for getting a penalty? See: Maddison, James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard a few fans moaning about him sitting on the ground waving his arms around in protest instead of getting on with the game. Thing is, I want players who will protest penalty decisions, it shows they have a winner's mentality. Maybe he should have got up and got on with the game, but it was a terrible decision, he was fully justified in kicking up a fuss. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He did it like 4 or 5 times though, often just because he'd lost the ball. I don't mind a couple of times when it's shit decisions like the penalty, but it felt like he was doing it all the time yesterday, a couple of times while Leeds had the ball and were quickly going on the counter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

He did it like 4 or 5 times though, often just because he'd lost the ball. I don't mind a couple of times when it's shit decisions like the penalty, but it felt like he was doing it all the time yesterday, a couple of times while Leeds had the ball and were quickly going on the counter.

Aye and Howe was having a right go at him about it, telling him to get up and rightfully so!

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

He did it like 4 or 5 times though, often just because he'd lost the ball. I don't mind a couple of times when it's shit decisions like the penalty, but it felt like he was doing it all the time yesterday, a couple of times while Leeds had the ball and were quickly going on the counter.

 

Fair enough, I do have issues in general with his lack of teamwork, he could probably learn a bit from Joelinton in that regard. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 22/01/2022 at 19:44, Inferior Acuña said:

Every commentator saying he went down too dramatically and that's why he didn't get it - I don't see it. The fall is real, and he's lifting his arms and screaming to say it's a foul, not to act like he's been shot.

 

I see it ... very clearly. No need to swan dive, it most likely convinced the referee it was more play acting than contact. VAR have been given clear guidance to only overturn a decision if there is a clear undebatable error been made. This one isn't clear it was highly unlikely to be overturned. he reality is, had ASM not gone down like he'd been shot, we'd probably have the penalty.

That said I think it's debatable it was a penalty in the first place - he appears to plant his foot then slip under his momentum before his theatrical display. If it had been at the other end of the pitch and Leeds had been awarded a penalty we'd have been livid, and rightly so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chayton said:

 

I see it ... very clearly. No need to swan dive, it most likely convinced the referee it was more play acting than contact. VAR have been given clear guidance to only overturn a decision if there is a clear undebatable error been made. This one isn't clear it was highly unlikely to be overturned. he reality is, had ASM not gone down like he'd been shot, we'd probably have the penalty.

That said I think it's debatable it was a penalty in the first place - he appears to plant his foot then slip under his momentum before his theatrical display. If it had been at the other end of the pitch and Leeds had been awarded a penalty we'd have been livid, and rightly so.

 

I reckon if you get clipped in the box and you're falling (which was a real fall as he loses footing due to contact) you'd naturally throw your hands in the air and scream HOWAY REF!! as you're going down.

 

 

Edited by Inferior Acuña

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, chayton said:

 

I see it ... very clearly. No need to swan dive, it most likely convinced the referee it was more play acting than contact. VAR have been given clear guidance to only overturn a decision if there is a clear undebatable error been made. This one isn't clear it was highly unlikely to be overturned. he reality is, had ASM not gone down like he'd been shot, we'd probably have the penalty.

That said I think it's debatable it was a penalty in the first place - he appears to plant his foot then slip under his momentum before his theatrical display. If it had been at the other end of the pitch and Leeds had been awarded a penalty we'd have been livid, and rightly so.

I agree. I didn’t think it was a clear penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gdm said:

It was a clear penalty man. Theatrical dive or not his foot gets sweeped

 

Definitely not clear. Both defences can be reasonably argued which is the very reason it wasn't overturned. 

 

Needs to stop going down like a hooker on speed.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s a massive penalty like. Player gets turned and sweeps other player’s leg away with his foot. Of course he tries to draw attention to it, but it is a foul for sure. 
 

They should really scrap VAR if it isn’t going to give things like that. Obvious ones, the ref can see anyway. 

 

 

Edited by AyeDubbleYoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Inferior Acuña said:

 

I reckon if you get clipped in the box and you're falling (which was a real fall as he loses footing due to contact) you'd naturally throw your hands in the air and scream HOWAY REF!! as you're going down.

 

 

 

Which is the very reason it wasn't given. Referees are looking for that sort of carry on. ASM is his own worst enemy.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, AyeDubbleYoo said:

It’s a massive penalty like. Player gets turned and sweeps other player’s leg away with his foot. Of course he tries to draw attention to it, but it is a foul for sure. 
 

They should really scrap VAR if it isn’t going to give things like that. Obvious ones, the ref can see anyway. 

 

 

 

 

This

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, AyeDubbleYoo said:

It’s a massive penalty like. Player gets turned and sweeps other player’s leg away with his foot. Of course he tries to draw attention to it, but it is a foul for sure. 
 

They should really scrap VAR if it isn’t going to give things like that. Obvious ones, the ref can see anyway. 

 

 

 

 

There is clear direction on VAR to only overturn decisions that are a clear refereeing error. This one is far from clear. There's a good couple of seconds between Koch's leg being out and ASM starting to fall. It's an odd one, his foot appears to be planted and then he slips under his own momentum. If there was contact, it's not difficult to understand how, in the heat of the moment, the referee missed it. And the theatrics will have influenced him that ASM was looking for it. Even in slo-mo, it's not a clear penalty. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chayton said:

 

Definitely not clear. Both defences can be reasonably argued which is the very reason it wasn't overturned. 

 

Needs to stop going down like a hooker on speed.

 

 

Fuck me, can we not revive Toontastic and kick this one back over there?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...