Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 what a pointless smug and twattish thing to say How? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 She is getting battered tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 She is getting battered tbf. No she’s not, she’s answering questions as she is supposed too. Cross examinations always look like someone ins getting battered. He’s tried to defer her answers by saying he’ll comeback to them later, knowing he won’t as it offers her a chance to explain what happened. Wait until they start cross examining the Barclays people, it will look equally as bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 To me, it's absolutely mental what you can watch these days If it can be watched then someone somewhere is wanking to it. Sorry, I wasn't even aware my camera was on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 You can watch it live here: https://cl-2016-000049.sparq.me.uk/ They have adjourned as they are having technical issues which means Staveley can’t see evidence presented to her. By technical issues I mean someones laptop froze. She's being questioned now. Fascinating watch Staveley seems understandably a bit nervous Watched a few minutes, she seemed fairly composed to me. Maybe she settled down by the time I logged on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 She’s doing fine considering she’s facing cross-examination. I don’t know what folk are on about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Easy to look like you're being battered when you're being asked very specific questions about documents that you might not have looked at in many many years Yes you can prepare but they will have submitted hundreds and possibly thousands of documents, impossible to remember the exact wording or context of emails etc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Also they are trying to catch her out and bamboozle her with semantics Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Does her performance in the courtroom have any bearing on our takeover ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Just out of interest how much does she stand to win if the verdict goes her way? I know the total amount is £1.5b, but surely she will only get a fraction of that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Does her performance in the courtroom have any bearing on our takeover ? Yeah, if she wins this she might be able to afford us herself when the Saudis fail the director's test. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 "You shouldn't do it, but I'm going to do it" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 what a pointless smug and twattish thing to say How? because why is he trying to convey she's putting on some sort of awful performance, I'd imagine its highly stressful in her position, and she's facing opposition, there's fans underneath that tweet saying "the case will be thrown out!/she's getting a pasting" don't see the point in him writing that as if he'd do any better or even as if she's doing badly at all. He's allowed to express his opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 what a pointless smug and twattish thing to say How? because why is he trying to convey she's putting on some sort of awful performance, I'd imagine its highly stressful in her position, and she's facing opposition, there's fans underneath that tweet saying "the case will be thrown out!/she's getting a pasting" don't see the point in him writing that as if he'd do any better or even as if she's doing badly at all. He's allowed to express his opinion. never said he wasn't and im allowed to express mine about it. He doesnt think she's putting on a good performance. That's all he's getting at. That's not "smuggish and twattish." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Good to see we've got a lot of experts on the forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Good to see we've got a lot of experts on the forum. As always. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Good to see we've got a lot of experts on the forum. Not only that, we could probably tell you what aircraft she's used in the last month and where she has been. Probably take out a restraining order against us when/if the takeover happens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicane Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Real talented bunch of folks on here. Law experts, multimillion-dollar business deal consultants, you name it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Well that was fun. One thing that I took from that, she knows a lot of Sheikhs, more than you could...Sheikh a stick at, if you will. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 state of some people on here honestly. no no why did he say that about amanda she looks under pressure! fucking hell man, it's something to talk about when there's fuck all happening. edit: am i right in hearing her mention bin zayed a few times too? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Imagine Mike Ashley being cross-examined on his business itinery from 12 years ago... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Just out of interest how much does she stand to win if the verdict goes her way? I know the total amount is £1.5b, but surely she will only get a fraction of that? If the court rules on her side then it could be £1.5bn or anywhere. It all depends on what commission she was owed for which parts and to which parties. For example she is claiming that she and her associates are owed £1.5bn because they assisted in structuring the deal. She was paid a lot less in commission for simply bringing the deal makers to the table. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 Imagine Mike Ashley being cross-examined on his business itinery from 12 years ago... ”I’m one man, a company is lots of people’. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 state of some people on here honestly. no no why did he say that about amanda she looks under pressure! fucking hell man, it's something to talk about when there's fuck all happening. edit: am i right in hearing her mention bin zayed a few times too? Aye she did. The Man City takeover was also referenced as well for some reason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts