Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"As you well know", "as you must already know", "as I had hoped you would have already known", etc., are the stupidest and most condescending rhetorical devices--especially when used over, and over, and over, and over, and over again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't get over Richard Masters sitting with Daniel fucking Levy days after the Premier League very publicly faced allegations in a court of law about inappropriate business with the likes of Levy. Arrogant shithead. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Yorkie said:

Can't get over Richard Masters sitting with Daniel fucking Levy days after the Premier League very publicly faced allegations in a court of law about inappropriate business with the likes of Levy. Arrogant shithead. 

 

You could argue that isn’t the actions of someone who fears repercussions through arbitration/CAT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d be worried if I we’re Dickie or Hoffy, hence why once this gets go ahead don’t expect arbitration to even happen.

 

Competition law exists to help businesses put their customers first and protect consumers and other businesses from being ripped off. If your business colludes with others to engage in price fixing, market sharing or bid rigging, whether regularly or just once, here’s what can happen.

 

1. You can be fined or even imprisoned

Anti-competitive collusion can lead to fines for the businesses involved of up to 10% of their annual worldwide turnover. Individuals can also face personal fines and even prison sentences.

 

2. You can be disqualified from acting as a company director

This disqualification can last up to 15 years, seriously affecting your business options.

 

3. You could be pursued for damages

Even if you avoid a fine or criminal charges, your customers could launch a civil claim for damages cases against you.

 

4. Your business’s reputation could be damaged

Engaging in anti-competitive behaviour not only affects those directly involved, it can also damage the entire business if customers decide they no longer want to work with you.

 

5. You can spend years fighting legal cases

Cartel investigations are meticulous and will divert significant senior management time away from legitimate business activity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

I’d be worried if I we’re Dickie or Hoffy, hence why once this gets go ahead don’t expect arbitration to even happen.

 

Competition law exists to help businesses put their customers first and protect consumers and other businesses from being ripped off. If your business colludes with others to engage in price fixing, market sharing or bid rigging, whether regularly or just once, here’s what can happen.

 

1. You can be fined or even imprisoned

Anti-competitive collusion can lead to fines for the businesses involved of up to 10% of their annual worldwide turnover. Individuals can also face personal fines and even prison sentences.

 

2. You can be disqualified from acting as a company director

This disqualification can last up to 15 years, seriously affecting your business options.

 

3. You could be pursued for damages

Even if you avoid a fine or criminal charges, your customers could launch a civil claim for damages cases against you.

 

4. Your business’s reputation could be damaged

Engaging in anti-competitive behaviour not only affects those directly involved, it can also damage the entire business if customers decide they no longer want to work with you.

 

5. You can spend years fighting legal cases

Cartel investigations are meticulous and will divert significant senior management time away from legitimate business activity.

Unless of course the hearing the other day results in the CAT case being kicked into touch as outside of their remit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we’ll get the result we want from the CAT hearing last week, but it’s pretty trivial as arbitration has always been the sole way of getting this takeover through.

 

Would be pleasantly surprised if we get anything from arbitration. A bent PL favoured panel and evidence behind closed doors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

I admire your optimism and I wish I felt the same as it must feel nice 

 

However it doesn't match with reality, which is that we have Ashley as owner and that will remain the case for a long time yet

 

Reality indicates that we will not have Ashley for much longer. We will win Arbitration, then things will (which will surprise a LOT of people) move very fast !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya see, I don’t think we will win arbitration. If the premier leagues rules say you have to go to arbitration then that’s what every team signed up for, including us.

 

We’ve tried to pull a fast one by taking the  to court as SJH rather than NUFC and I don’t for one minute think the CAT Tribunal will go for it.

 

 

Edited by BennyBlanco

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, manorpark said:

 

Reality indicates that we will not have Ashley for much longer. We will win Arbitration, then things will (which will surprise a LOT of people) move very fast !!!

im-serious-stop-calling-me-shirley.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said:

Ya see, I don’t think we will win arbitration. If the premier leagues rules say you have to go to arbitration then that’s what every team signed up for, including us.

 

We’ve tried to pull a fast one by taking the  to court as SJH rather than NUFC and I don’t for one minute think the CAT Tribunal will go for it.

 

 

 

Stick to talking with dead pigeons Benny lad.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Whitley mag

Link to post
Share on other sites

One day, if this all ends in bad taste, I'm pretty much looking forward to SlingingMania on here.

 

Dynamite Twins @Fantail Breeze & @Joey Linton vs Brothers of Positivity @Whitley mag& @manorpark.  Of course @BennyBlanco might do a run-in for the heels but we could just lock the whole lot up inside Hell in a Cell, free for all, last man standing. 

 

 

 

Edited by nufcjb

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said:

Wouldn’t mind but I only gave my opinion on the CAT hearing. 
 

Keith, as per, has to lower the tone.

He’s a bugger that Keith isn’t he, I mean that CAT hearing I wonder how that came about [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

He’s a bugger that Keith isn’t he, I mean that CAT hearing I wonder how that came about [emoji38]


He’s a bugger for self publicity. It’s made him drop some right bollocks and look a bit of a right royal titty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...