Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BennyBlanco said:


He’s a bugger for self publicity. It’s made him drop some right bollocks and look a bit of a right royal titty.

The elephant in the thread though is that without that royal titty you wouldn’t have a CAT case to talk about.

 

As you we’re though, far be it from me to lower the tone any further.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Whitley mag said:

The elephant in the thread though is that without that royal titty you wouldn’t have a CAT case to talk about.

 

As you we’re though, far be it from me to lower the tone any further.

 

 

I’m beginning to think that’s a myth as well. Has there actually been any proof Ashley’s CAT case is at all linked to Keith’s. The man has talked that much shite I don’t know what to believe. I mean he seemingly photoshopped a screenshot to make it look like the club was phoning him ffs

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

The elephant in the thread though is that without that royal titty you wouldn’t have a CAT case to talk about.

 

As you we’re though, far be it from me to lower the tone any further.

 

 


 

At least you own the fact that you are Keith now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, gdm said:

I’m beginning to think that’s a myth as well. Has there actually been any proof Ashley’s CAT case is at all linked to Keith’s. The man has talked that much shite I don’t know what to believe. I mean he seemingly photoshopped a screenshot to make it look like the club was phoning him ffs

The club weren’t even going down that route until he approached them. Even Nick De Marco congratulated him when the club took the action on.

 

I’ve no doubt the case has been changed considerably by the club, but credit where it’s due as far as I’m concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

The club weren’t even going down that route until he approached them. Even Nick De Marco congratulated him when the club took the action on.

 

I’ve no doubt the case has been changed considerably by the club, but credit where it’s due as far as I’m concerned.

Where did nick de Marco congratulate him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Joey Linton said:

Nah, you definitely aren't Keith. So how do you know any of that is true? 

Despite getting some dud info at times which he has naively passed on thinking he is doing folk a favour, the bloke is not a liar.

 

Not a popular opinion on here, but I’ve never cared much about that.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BennyBlanco said:

Ya see, I don’t think we will win arbitration. If the premier leagues rules say you have to go to arbitration then that’s what every team signed up for, including us.

 

We’ve tried to pull a fast one by taking the  to court as SJH rather than NUFC and I don’t for one minute think the CAT Tribunal will go for it.

 

 

 

 

Competition law is concerned with legal entities, SJH is the correct vehicle to use as it would be them (as the selling party) who would see losses

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, gdm said:

Where did nick de Marco congratulate him?

 

He hasn’t.

 

Keith’s “info” was bullshit and not even true, regarding Saudi interest in Spurs. He’s been discredited by every single person involved.

 

I have no doubt he probably sent it to the club, but it has had no impact whatsoever on proceedings. 

 

You really think the club or their legal team would let someone mouth off as much as Keith has if he was even remotely involved? :lol:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Despite getting some dud info at times which he has naively passed on thinking he is doing folk a favour, the bloke is not a liar.

 

Not a popular opinion on here, but I’ve never cared much about that.

 

 

Ok. But how do you know the club weren’t going down the CAT route and how do you know de Marco personally congratulated him? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Despite getting some dud info at times which he has naively passed on thinking he is doing folk a favour, the bloke is not a liar.

 

Not a popular opinion on here, but I’ve never cared much about that.

 

 

Why do you come on here, then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Whitley mag said:

A certain person 

Strange as someone very very close to Ashley was regularly in touch with him as recently as last month as far as I’m aware.

 

But you know best Fanny [emoji38]

 

We’re talking about the same guy who faked a screenshot of the club phoning him, right? :lol: 

 

I’m sure you’ll be able to back up these ludicrous claims? Weird how you’re all of a sudden so ITK about Keith.

 

Absolutely nothing Keith has said has come true - he’s actually got a hell of a lot wrong. That’s really weird considering he has such a good contact direct to Ashley.

 

 

Edited by Fantail Breeze

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

 

We’re talking about the same guy who faked a screenshot of the club phoning him, right? :lol: 

 

I’m sure you’ll be able to back up these ludicrous claims? Weird how you’re all of a sudden so ITK about Keith.

 

Absolutely nothing Keith has said has come true - he’s actually got a hell of a lot wrong. That’s really weird considering he has such a good contact direct to Ashley.

 

 

 

I’ll back up these ludicrous claims when you produce the screenshot ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does this thread always fucking end up becoming arguments about Bullshit Keith (and now a fucking pigeon account). The only people who know what is going on are legal teams of NUFC and SJH and the legal teams of the Premier League. All other bullshit through twitter is just either clickbait or people on a wind up. Let's just wait for the actual legal decisions to be made and stop posting absolute total shit from the usual suspects. As I said earlier, there has been some decent discussion the last week based on actual legal presentations. 

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

We’re talking about the same guy who faked a screenshot of the club phoning him, right? :lol: 

 

Jesus I forgot about that. Didn't it literally say "The Club" on his screen or something? :spit:

 

What a joke of a human.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Whitley mag said:

Stick to talking with dead pigeons Benny lad.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can I not just ask, is this not a form of doxxing? I mean posting people's personal accounts/details is a no no right? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Colos Short and Curlies said:

 

Competition law is concerned with legal entities, SJH is the correct vehicle to use as it would be them (as the selling party) who would see losses


 

Im not bothered pal. If that’s the level that Keith wants to stoop to then I’m not the arsehole in the conversation am I?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...