Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jesus Christ man reading through the comments on the Tyneside Life video. "Well done on calling out this person" and words to that affect repeated over and over. Like this is 'speaking truth to power' or some shit :lol:

 

Oh no. I made a short comment saying it was embarrassing and I instantly got 

"I’m interested to hear how your views may differ from mine?" :lol: :anguish:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not watching those videos because I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would, but I've proper gone down the rabbit hole of how to respond to "I'm just asking questions" and the bad faith tactics behind using this approach. 

 

For all the articles Google has brought up, I haven't yet found a strategy that deals with the 'just asking questions' person except ignoring them :lol:. Would be nice to have a clearer way to shut that bad faith level of 'inquiry' down.

 

Also, I learned a new adjacent term to the 'questions' one above "sealioning", which is apparently taken it's origins from this comic:

image.thumb.png.b0b4fc50b9e69af2796297456ecaa68e.png

 

:milner:

 

 

 

Edited by Guybrush

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Wolfcastle said:

I wouldn't be too concerned if I were him, its just yet another business the Saudi's have invested in.

You can attach 'sportswashing' to differentiate it from anything else and that's a load of bollocks in itself. Could just as easily come up with 'business-washing' and or 'airline washing' and leave sport off the hook like those industries are now.

As is the notion that 'sportswashing' is to hide their human rights records when owning football clubs and hosting world cups is one of the worst things you could do if that's the case (most people in the west knew nothing about Qatar until they got/hosted the world cup) so you have to doubt that's the case at all.

 

Think the most genuine concern should come from people who love the club and dont want it associated with Saudi. The other way I don't think really works. You shouldn't feel any differently about KSA now than you did before they owned a football club.

 

Just my two penneth obviously.

 

 

 

Agree that’s who the most genuine concern should be when it comes to ‘sportswashing’. The human rights issues are what KSA does to people and not how they’re trying to improve their reputation, not that that’s what it’s solely about anyway. It would be weird and inconsistent if this takeover was blocked on sportswashing grounds as the likes of AI wanted, as it’s not a legal issue, but can still understandably make people feel uncomfortable - someone who cheers the team on and the success their money might bring would typically feel more uneasy than others who gain no benefit from it. 

 

Regarding the success of sportswashing, I think it’s a bit different to whitewashing as it isn’t really covering up the acts, but giving more positive coverage in addition. There aren’t other similar words currently as you say, but isn’t trying to improve a reputation typical for all sorts of entities (including businesses, organisations etc) that have and can do harmful things? In fact some could say we did it over here in 2005 by winning the Olympics not long after invading Middle Eastern countries. 
 

Ultimately though I’m not sure it’s about being seen as more likeable, but more about relevant and intertwined with our culture and politics for economic benefit primarily. I don’t think all their investment in football has really made them seem more likeable or improved a reputation. It’s no doubt helped western tourism and bizarrely gained a small number of apologists within our fanbase, but for all the attention they’ve gained for sport, they’ve also gained it for human rights issues. And the Saudi league by and large seems to be another reason to be annoyed at the country right now. Appreciate maybe that will change in time though. 

 

 

Edited by St. Maximin

Link to post
Share on other sites

The comments section in that video is deeply ironic with tons of projection like.

 

People throwing their hands up saying how he refuses to define sportswashing, while embodying it.

 

Others saying to keep politics out of football, while defending our state ownership.

 

Others saying the protest will change nothing, while saying our Saudi ownership can be a positive vehicle for change.

 

People calling Eddy a balanced, impartial, fair 'journalist' when he described the protestor's rhetoric as "bile" and "inappropriate"

 

Others calling the protestors brainwashed.

 

and then Eddy himself bemoaning how while the protestor has the right to do so, should be challenged and can't handle being questioned...ignoring that the protestor themselves are challenging the club, and then Eddy himself blocks or threatens to block people who even mildly challenge him.

 

But yeah, sportswashing doesn't really exist.

 

It's funny, because I've always thought of "...washing" like whitewashing - a PR cover for things, but the comments section has made realise that brainwashing applies just as much.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem I have is people using Newcastle United as their only focus for protest, when often their real agenda is a sly dig at the fans (see rtg). The government should be the primary focus. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, RS said:

The problem I have is people using Newcastle United as their only focus for protest, when often their real agenda is a sly dig at the fans (see rtg). The government should be the primary focus. 

 

You use the best vehicle to get your message out, sadly that's us.

 

This is why Just Stop Oil etc target sporting events primarily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the sportswashing element that stuff will just come and go and it's not really the real aim of KSA.

 

The real aim is to integrate with our economic, political and social systems so that they buy leverage for when they need it and they will need it for when their enemies start to embolden when the Americans firmly drop out of controlling the world which is arriving shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think anyone who posts on here is sympathetic to what Saudi do. We know the score like.

 

The question of sportswashing is a murkier topic. I certainly don’t see a vanity project with our club in the same way as the boxing has been or say wrestling events. That shit is fairly blatant. Yet they seem to get way more of a pass than our club has gotten.

 

For as much as people are correct when it comes to Saudi, there’s an equal share of double standards and hypocrisy. Where are these people when Iraq was being invaded, or scientists being murdered.. or how about a cover up of why dozens of people burned alive in a tower block. You’d swear every other country apart from Saudi is squeaky clean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said:

The question of sportswashing is a murkier topic. I certainly don’t see a vanity project with our club in the same way as the boxing has been or say wrestling events. That shit is fairly blatant. Yet they seem to get way more of a pass than our club has gotten.

Dunno about that like. From the team playing a friendly mid season in Saudi Arabia to Saudi National team playing at st James park with The team playing in what would have been a decent mock up of a Saudi kit and the documentary in between. It doesn’t get any more blatent than that 

 

 

Edited by gdm

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Kid Icarus said:

Speak for yourself. After that Hull match my only engagement with our fans was hating and shaming those who weren't on board. :lol:

 

Yeah, I've often thought an N-O podcast would be good. Main host, different posters every week sort of thing.

 

 

Clubhouse chats would potentially be a good idea for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Orphanage said:

Apparently sportswashing is now a ' woke ' trope . Way to avoid being challenged Eddie 


 

 

Absolutely. Guess Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage, who have both criticised our take over are “woke”aswell. Would love to listen to him try and explain what he thinks woke actually means.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr Jinx said:

I don’t think anyone who posts on here is sympathetic to what Saudi do. We know the score like.

 

The question of sportswashing is a murkier topic. I certainly don’t see a vanity project with our club in the same way as the boxing has been or say wrestling events. That shit is fairly blatant. Yet they seem to get way more of a pass than our club has gotten.

 

For as much as people are correct when it comes to Saudi, there’s an equal share of double standards and hypocrisy. Where are these people when Iraq was being invaded, or scientists being murdered.. or how about a cover up of why dozens of people burned alive in a tower block. You’d swear every other country apart from Saudi is squeaky clean.

Its quite easy to want to protest the Saudis and their crimes as well as our own governments in fact id say it well nigh impossible to not do both given our countries history in that region

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Rafalove said:


 

 

Absolutely. Guess Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage, who have both criticised our take over are “woke”aswell. Would love to listen to him try and explain what he thinks woke actually means.

Would love to know if Eddie protested our invasions of Iraq / Afghanistan etc . Something tells me he probably cheered them on 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...