Jump to content

PIF, PCP, and RB Sports & Media


Yorkie

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

Would be ironic if the complaint came from La Liga, Real Madrid and Barca have been amongst the worst offenders over the years when it comes to chucking money about 

Real have been state sponsored since Franco :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could have sworn we left the EU a couple of years back and it was one of the reasons the fucking crooked Leave campaign gave was that UK businesses etc would be able to receive state aid? So does the EC have any jurisdiction in the UK and not all UEFA members are EU members.

 

 

 

Edited by FloydianMag

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how we could be accused of distorting the market anymore than the American owned clubs. Football has rules in place FFP which prevents us from doing that very thing, not sure how they’d be able to accuse any state owned club of distorting the market unless they breached it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

American owners trying to fundamentally destroy the football pyramid and state owners buying clubs as part of wider geopolitical goals are both clearly bad for football as we know it.

 

We get more flack than others, and as a fan group we're often placed in an impossible position where we are told we have to stop doing something that has run in our families for generations and if we don't and we actually enjoy a 'product' that is immeasurably better than anything we've seen in 20 plus there is blood on our hands. But let's not pretend that none of the criticism of the owners is valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Geordie_once_removed said:

American owners trying to fundamentally destroy the football pyramid and state owners buying clubs as part of wider geopolitical goals are both clearly bad for football as we know it.

 

We get more flack than others, and as a fan group we're often placed in an impossible position where we are told we have to stop doing something that has run in our families for generations and if we don't and we actually enjoy a 'product' that is immeasurably better than anything we've seen in 20 plus there is blood on our hands. But let's not pretend that none of the criticism of the owners is valid.

As Eddie says “I’m here for the football” 

ours is only going to get better. Let’s start with smashing the “teeth grinder’s” lot today. :indi:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FloydianMag said:

I could have sworn we left the EU a couple of years back and it was one of the reasons the fucking crooked Leave campaign gave was that UK businesses etc would be able to receive state aid? So does the EC have any jurisdiction in the UK and not all UEFA members are EU members.

 

 

 

 

 

There's still rules against levels of state aid with the trade agreement we have with the EU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

The only accusations that could stick would be something like the Sela money actually coming from PIF/KSA directly rather than Sela itself. I think that was/is one of the things they're trying to get Man City on?

That will never happen to us! If it did we deserve the consequences. It won’t by the way. We have smart owners! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

There's still rules against levels of state aid with the trade agreement we have with the EU.

We don’t receive state aid and perhaps you could link the Trade and Cooperation agreement with the EU and the relevant section on State Aid? I can’t be arsed to go through the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

We don’t receive state aid and perhaps you could link the Trade and Cooperation agreement with the EU and the relevant section on State Aid? I can’t be arsed to go through the agreement.

 

You bloody do it since you brought it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

You bloody do it since you brought it up.

Had a quick look, it mainly applies to goods between the UK and NI w2hich is still in the EUSM.

 

https://www.economy-ni.gov.uk/articles/state-aid-and-subsidy-control-after-eu-exit

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/complying-with-the-uks-international-obligations-on-subsidy-control-guidance-for-public-authorities/guidance-on-the-scope-and-application-of-article-10-of-the-windsor-framework

 

 

Edited by FloydianMag

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take it with a pinch of salt, Nick Harris wrote this pile of shite so that says it all really.

 

The new rules may or may not apply to the PL.

 

Theyve been in force since June and the article can’t confirm if any state funds come from the UAE.

 

As for the commission investigation, the commission was asked by Harris and they gave a generic reply that they look into all situations where state aid may inflate markets. But the article boldly states however the commission may open an investigation.

 

It’s just a shite article from Sportingcel and surprise surprise the Daily fucking Mail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

...since the end of the transition period whereby EU State aid law ceased to apply to any aid granted by the UK except where it affects trade between Northern Ireland and the EU that is subject to the Windsor Framework.

Source https://cms-lawnow.com/en/ealerts/2023/06/revised-guidance-on-the-application-of-eu-state-aid-rules-in-the-uk-post-brexit#:~:text=The revised EC Notice%2C which,EU that is subject to

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...