Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just now, The Prophet said:

 

Rereading your post. I certainly wouldn't be happy, but you're holding a manager to a standard when he's had eleven less games to get there. Unless I've missed your point, it seems an odd one.

We can average it to PPG if that suits. The point is clear his mandate was to keep us up, he’s had the backing of all parties so far but if he fails he should be dismissed. 
 

Nothing against him personally or even that he’s a bad manager but he would have failed if we go down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Rich said:

He’d have to go if we went down like. Seems a decent bloke but he’ll have had enough time and backing in the market to turn it around. Don’t think he could have any arguments.

 

Agree. I like him immensely, but you have to make the best of what you've got. I know this squad has serious failings, but I think shoe-horning players into his preferred formations rather than picking one that suits the players he's got has backfired. 

 

Let's see what he can do when he brings in players to do his own style, he's still got 18 games left. It's stay up or bust basically. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

I agree with that but I will reserve judgement on him until that either does or doesn't happen. 

 

That's fair, I don't want him out currently either, however the lack of bounce from the players from his appointment has been shocking imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

We can average it to PPG if that suits. The point is clear his mandate was to keep us up, he’s had the backing of all parties so far but if he fails he should be dismissed. 
 

Nothing against him personally or even that he’s a bad manager but he would have failed if we go down. 

 

As I've said I think if we go down, it'll very much depends on the manner of it. If we're sat here in May and he's still only won 2-3 games, I'll agree with you.

 

 

Edited by The Prophet

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Menace said:

Dean Smith has 3 wins, 2 draws in 11 matches

 

Eddie Howe has 1 win 4 draws  in 10 matches

 

You can argue that our team is shit, but our team is not worse than Norwich. This guy has done absolutely nothing so far to justify us to stick by him if he sends us down. In my eyes he's a glorified Scott Parker

Absolutely this and absolutely spot on, I wasn’t sure about Howe from the start and after every game so far my fears about him are turning out to be true 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Rereading your post. I certainly wouldn't be happy, but you're holding a manager to a standard when he's had eleven less games to get there. Unless I've missed your point, it seems an odd one.


I think the point is one rooted in objectivity. Any other club, any other year, and a manager who took over in October, received full backing of owners in the transfer window, full backing of fans, spoke about getting a tune out of the squad he took over, but ultimately gets relegated, it would be deemed a failure. Where the blame lies or is attributed is for all of us to parse, but a failure it is, and, objectively, that man in charge has to own some of it. This goes for any walk of life, in any job. 

 

 

Edited by DJ_NUFC
Grammar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think the Dean Smith comparisons are misleading given we have had a significantly harder run of matches than they have - and they would have lost one more and we won one more if not for Ciaran Clark

 

 

Edited by Dandy Man

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TRon said:

I still think he'll turn it around fwiw. He deserves the chance to show what he can do with players he brings in to play his own way. 


As stated, I’m fully behind him. I genuinely like the bloke, and he and his team fill me with joy when I see them gesticulating on the touchline. But results do matter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was watching Brighton the other night and was really impressed with how Potter has got them playing. I get the feeling every club is looking for a quick fix these days, rather than allowing a manager to impose his style on the team, with his own players. 

 

Obviously it's a results business and if you're not winning games you're going to be sacked, but part of me wants to see what Howe can do with a couple of seasons under his belt here.

 

I wasn't a massive fan of him being appointed, but I don't want to become like Watford and change our manager every 6 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not debating whether it'd be a failure or whether he should own some it. It would be and he should. I'm saying I don't necessarily think he should be sacked.

 

For example being six plus points adrift with a couple of wins would be unforgivable and he'd have to go, but if were to end the season with momentum, winning a decent number of games with an improvement there for all to see and we go down by a point or two, it might be worth keeping him on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dandy Man said:

Think the Dean Smith comparisons are misleading given we have had a significantly harder run of matches than they have - and they would have lost one mode and we won one more if not for Ciaran Clark

1 win from, Norwich, Brentford, Watford and Cambridge tells you everything you need to know, and you can add an injury ravaged Leeds team that are fielding 16 year olds to that after tomorrow. Howe is plainly the wrong man for the job and proves it more after every game 

 

 

Edited by nufcnick

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

Agree. I like him immensely, but you have to make the best of what you've got. I know this squad has serious failings, but I think shoe-horning players into his preferred formations rather than picking one that suits the players he's got has backfired. 

 

Let's see what he can do when he brings in players to do his own style, he's still got 18 games left. It's stay up or bust basically. 

 

I don't think he has 18 games to be honest. With Benitez now lurking in the background I think he has about 5 games to show that he WILL get us out of this. Not saying that would be the correct thing to do but I just think it will happen. The murmurs in the fanbase have started and if we are still bottom three at the end of Feb then I think there will be a helluva a noise from that same fanbase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, nufcnick said:

1 win from, Norwich, Brentford, Watford and Cambridge tell you everything you need to know, and you can add an injury ravaged Leeds team that are fielding 16 year olds to that after tomorrow. Howe is plainly the wrong man for the job and proves it more after every game 

A Conte/Pep/Klopp hybrid would struggle to get anything out of this squad man. No matter how well the likes of Potter are doing, I genuinely doubt whether they’d be able to do any better than Howe with us. The club is just rancid from top to bottom, and certainly throughout the squad. It’s going to take a hell of a long, expensive rebuild to turn this ship around. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Manxst said:

A Conte/Pep/Klopp hybrid would struggle to get anything out of this squad man. No matter how well the likes of Potter are doing, I genuinely doubt whether they’d be able to do any better than Howe with us. The club is just rancid from top to bottom, and certainly throughout the squad. It’s going to take a hell of a long, expensive rebuild to turn this ship around. 

If that’s the case we were absolutely mental to get rid of Bruce as he managed to get some points out of them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Manxst said:

A Conte/Pep/Klopp hybrid would struggle to get anything out of this squad man. No matter how well the likes of Potter are doing, I genuinely doubt whether they’d be able to do any better than Howe with us. The club is just rancid from top to bottom, and certainly throughout the squad. It’s going to take a hell of a long, expensive rebuild to turn this ship around. 

 

Not sure if you're referring to my point on Potter, but that wasn't what I meant. I meant that managers need time and the good ones manage to get their teams playing a certain way. We don't have that at the moment, partly because the players aren't capable, and partly because Howe hasn't had time to get us playing the way he wants. I'm certain he eventually will, but it will take a couple of years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ManDoon said:

We haven't lost to Leeds yet. Howe deserves some criticism but not on game she hasn't actually played

Feel free to bookmark this post and comeback to me tomorrow after the game, and I bet you I’m the one that’s right

 

 

Edited by nufcnick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ManDoon said:

See I don't necessarily beleive that to be true tbh. Sure the team is dog, but look at how Leeds performed against West Ham, with hugely depleted sqaud. That's all their manager, that's his play style. All the youth players coming on played the way he wanted them to.

Leeds have been pretty tragic for a lot of the season though, according to my mate. It's only been the last few games where they've picked up some form and look properly like their old selves again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

If that’s the case we were absolutely mental to get rid of Bruce as he managed to get some points out of them. 

He didn’t though. As I said earlier, the points came purely from a fluke run of form from Willock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Same squad Bruce got a mid table finish with. 
 

remember, Howe is the better coach/ manager shouldn’t we be expecting more?

 

  

47 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

It doesn't seem to work like that though, the squad is the same but everyone else has improved and the other shit teams from last year have been relegated. We see this happen year after year, clubs fail to invest over the years and eventually they have a season like the one we're having.

 

Just off the top of my head you can follow the same pattern with Stoke, Villa, West Brom, Swansea, Fulham before they started yo-yoing, and Wigan. When you watched those teams you could sense relegation was in the post and this Newcastle squad's no different.

 

FWIW I do think we're getting more, just not to the extent that it's ending up in wins. 

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, SUPERTOON said:

Other than Rafa who would we even get in here go he goes anyway ? We struggled to get anyone in before appointing him and if anything or situation is arguably worse now than it was then. 

 

I have a different thought on this; the importance is bringing in the right DOF, and let them worry about the manager. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do really think he's struggled to get the balance right. We either look relatively compact and turgid in the final third, or we incredibly easy to play through and threatening up top.

 

Having an absolutely terrible midfield plays a part in that, but it's on him to solve it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...