Jump to content

Do you still back Eddie Howe?  

735 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes
      117
    • No
      92


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

If he didn't win anything, he failed. Any manager who doesnt achieve what the aim of football is should be deemed to have failed, no matter the level

The manager of Gibraltar will be chuffed to hear that.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

If he didn't win anything, he failed. Any manager who doesnt achieve what the aim of football is should be deemed to have failed, no matter the level

 

What's the aim of a football forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

If he didn't win anything, he failed. Any manager who doesnt achieve what the aim of football is should be deemed to have failed, no matter the level

 

Won the Intertoto. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

If he didn't win anything, he failed. Any manager who doesnt achieve what the aim of football is should be deemed to have failed, no matter the level


Are you real life or one of these AI things? I can’t imagine having a serious conversation with you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Shays Given Tim Flowers said:


Don’t be a jerk. 

 

Its not being. Bobby is my favourite ever manager for NUFC and he worked wonders, but to say he didnt fail would be wrong.

 

Perhaps i just expect more. In our lifetime our only successful manager swere Benitez who achieve the maximum in one season he could, same for Hughton and now Howe, everyone else didn't win anything. Success is determined by trophies, not a decent finish

 

 

Edited by Tonalis Bookie
terrible spelling

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Elliottman said:


Are you real life or one of these AI things? I can’t imagine having a serious conversation with you. 

 

Most certainly real [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

 

Its not being. Bobby is my favourite ever manager for NUFC and he worked wonders, but to say he didnt fail would be wrong.

 

Perhaps i just expect more. In our lifetime our only successful manager swere Benitez who achieve the maximum in one season he could, same for Hughton and now Howe, everyone else didn't win anything. Success is determined by trophies, not a decent finish

 

 

 

 

What do you think of Roeder's time here as manager?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

 

Its not being. Bobby is my favourite ever manager for NUFC and he worked wonders, but to say he didnt fail would be wrong.

 

Perhaps i just expect more. In our lifetime our only successful manager swere Benitez who achieve the maximum in one season he could, same for Hughton and now Howe, everyone else didn't win anything. Success is determined by trophies, not a decent finish

 

 

 

So, to be clear, it is deemed successful to win the b league - and thus finish 21st in the pyramid - but deemed a failure to finish 2nd in the PL (Keegan) and 3rd in the PL (Robson). 
 

And if Rafa had kept us up, but then gone onto to achieve survival a few times, he would be deemed a failure for not having won a trophy?

 

Is dinner only successful if you eat all of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fak said:

 

What do you think of Roeder's time here as manager?

 

Did a reasonable job under tough circumstances. Souness stole something amazing from the fanbase and added to what was an implsion waiting to happen and to manage that was impressive. Definitely wasnt helped by the fact we were flat broke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

 

Its not being. Bobby is my favourite ever manager for NUFC and he worked wonders, but to say he didnt fail would be wrong.

 

Perhaps i just expect more. In our lifetime our only successful manager swere Benitez who achieve the maximum in one season he could, same for Hughton and now Howe, everyone else didn't win anything. Success is determined by trophies, not a decent finish

 

 

 


But that’s just because you say so.   Bobby himself quantified success as leaving a club in a better place than when you found it. 
 

Fair enough if we won trophies every year like, but we don’t. The guy who wants Howe sacked getting annoyed because the late Glenn Roeder was put in the hall of fame at the same time as Howe starts to give off a bit of a vibe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Theregulars said:

So, to be clear, it is deemed successful to win the b league - and thus finish 21st in the pyramid - but deemed a failure to finish 2nd in the PL (Keegan) and 3rd in the PL (Robson). 
 

And if Rafa had kept us up, but then gone onto to achieve survival a few times, he would be deemed a failure for not having won a trophy?

 

Is dinner only successful if you eat all of it?

 

I think youve summed it up. if you achieve a trophy or one of the best things available i.e promotion, you were successful.

 

Keegan had a successful season when we were promoted so yes he was a success. if we just look at his seasons where we failed to win the league then no he wasnt successful, he failed

 

I don't see whats difficult here? if you win, you are, if you lose, you arent

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shays Given Tim Flowers said:


But that’s just because you say so.   Bobby himself quantified success as leaving a club in a better place than when you found it. 
 

Fair enough if we won trophies every year like, but we don’t. The guy who wants Howe sacked getting annoyed because the late Glenn Roeder was put in the hall of fame at the same time as Howe starts to give off a bit of a vibe.

 

Bobby is one of my heroes, but leaving something better than when it started isnt success, its progression

 

I can accept if somebody has been successful in Howe's case whilst also saying what i always say, his on the field successes as a coach are incredible, his off the field actions as a manager arent. This has never ever changed and I always make this definition

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tonalis Bookie said:

I don't see whats difficult here? if you win, you are, if you lose, you arent

Well you haven't quantified his question about Benitez. Benitez you deem as a success here because he won the Championship, but he had to relegated us to do so. But if he did his primary objective and kept us up, he'd have been a failure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think had Rafa kept us up he would have done well given a rotten set of circumstances but we knew when he came in the chances of us staying up were slim at best. Us staying up would have been a brilliant job and he would have achieved his objective but staying in a league isn't success, its the basics that Steve McLaren massively let us down on. if a plane is going down to a human error and somebody else jumps int he seat its not their fault if they cant right the problem. rafa was a desperate throw of the dice but the players were there who were more than capable of staying up

 

The fact he then stayed and managed what was a rotten core of a club & succcessfully took it up i think it is great and was him beign successful as he achieved the best goal he could that year.

 

Who was more successful last year, Daniel Farke who won the Championship or Arteta who won nothing but got a champions league final? Success is defined by winning, not how well you do in a season

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...