Jump to content

Do you still back Eddie Howe?  

735 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes
      117
    • No
      92


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

 

Isn't cowardly a bit much? Wasn't it more of a case of sit deep to conserve energy and hit them on the break ? Again I don't like this plan against the Mackems but I do see the logic. 

Possibly, I just think we went there not to lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Whitley mag said:

It was a surrender and emotions are running high, whatever  you want you want to call our approach on Sunday it was unacceptable in a game of that magnitude and not a game you conserve energy you in.

Agree, I found it unacceptable and was fuming still am but I'm not going as far as cowardly. Again I do see what we were trying to do but it was completely wrong imo. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I actually thought the approach to the game on Sunday was a bit cowardly tbh. We went there to try not lose imo. Howe isn’t a coward mind.


I thought we were shit for 20 minutes and then started to slowly creep into the game. The OG straight after the half killed us. They had no real chances and neither did we. Dreadful game of football all round. 
 

I thought both teams were ‘cowardly’ if that is the case and the terminology you want to use. Both sides seemed to be playing not to lose and the stats bear that out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, et tu brute said:


I certainly would on Sunday and today trying to justify it by saying it was the same set up as Everton is total bullshit and cowardly. Call it out for what it was a total shit show. Hey you disagree that's fine

 

 

 

You said he's a coward, full stop. You've since rowed back on that. Which is ironic...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just my opinion but I thought Sunday’s setup was cowardly and a mess. 
 

There were many occasions when you see our defence and midfield in flat lines with Xhaka orchestrating in front. Neville (one of the worst managers in history) was calling it that our midfield and defence were far too deep which left Nick isolated.

 

Gordon and Elanga played poorly but they kept receiving the ball in our own half and having to run it up the pitch.

 

The only reaction we got was due to going a goal behind. It was not proactive, it was totally reactive. How many times do we make triple subs on the hour.

 

Then as the game went on, as has happened many times this season with subs, we ended up a mess. Willock running in to space that Hall would need etc. No structure at all.

 

In general I don’t think Howe is a coward, but the cowardly setup and performance on Sunday is on him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, et tu brute said:


He was on Sunday though. Today disagreeing with his captain (after his captain said what he should have done) and then try and say it was a similar set up to Everton is cowardly also.

Eddie Howe said he's gonna chin you. He's just been on the wireless. He'll meet you outside Old Orleans at 3. He said leave your jaw in the ken, cos he'll just end up snapping it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lush Vlad said:


I thought we were shit for 20 minutes and then started to slowly creep into the game. The OG straight after the half killed us. They had no real chances and neither did we. Dreadful game of football all round. 
 

I thought both teams were ‘cowardly’ if that is the case and the terminology you want to use. Both sides seemed to be playing not to lose and the stats bear that out. 

Aye, I agree with that. Obviously my focus is on us and as the superior team, it’s much worse for us to try not lose imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve criticised the manager for many things but being a coward isn’t one of them.

 

Cautious yes, but that’s where we are because of the other elements.

 

The mackems game, they were taking the play to us and we were hoping to catch them on the counter which we as a team are still well capable of doing but once the goal went in they sat back and they were the ones looking to counter then.

 

That’s always been this teams weak spot, unlocking a low block. We just don’t have the patterns of play to do it and we never have.

 

I can’t see where he’s going to suddenly find that and ultimately why I feel a change is probably for the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt1892 said:

Big week coming up.

 

If we go out of the cup and lose to Chelsea then I wouldn’t be surprised to see him moved on.

 

 

Even if we lose both those fixtures.

 

I would like to think he will have the January window to fix some of the issues in the squad.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, et tu brute said:


He was on Sunday though. Today disagreeing with his captain (after his captain said what he should have done) and then try and say it was a similar set up to Everton is cowardly also.

 

The setup can be similar and the game go a different way. There is another team in each game we play.

 

 

Edited by Dr Venkman

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Dr Venkman said:

 

The setup can be similar and they game go a different way. There is another team in each game we play.


Disagree there mind totally. The Everton and Sunderland set ups were like chalk and cheese. You get nothing, if just about your entire team is sitting in its own half. We didn't do that against Everton.

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...