Jump to content

Hugo Ekitike (not playing for Liverpool for a while)


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Couldn't give a shite about this bloke now. Liverpool and the lackey journos have got me rattled. I wouldn't have the nuts for this business, like; fine we'll just take DCL.

I’m pessimistic if we agree a deal with Ekitike I’m convinced Isak will go. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Couldn't give a shite about this bloke now. Liverpool and the lackey journos have got me rattled. I wouldn't have the nuts for this business, like; fine we'll just take DCL.

Thank God you aren’t in charge of our transfers (no offence) [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Couldn't give a shite about this bloke now. Liverpool and the lackey journos have got me rattled. I wouldn't have the nuts for this business, like; fine we'll just take DCL.

We’re fighting with the big boys now. It’s a blessing and a curse. But this is the future. Strong stomachs needed from here on out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Yorkie said:

Couldn't give a shite about this bloke now. Liverpool and the lackey journos have got me rattled. I wouldn't have the nuts for this business, like; fine we'll just take DCL.

I want him cos he's the nearest thing to Isak with time to reach Isaks level. They would be devastating together, can play individually to rotate and unless we are seen as definite title challengers (and I dont think we are too far off) I think Isak is off next Summer.

 

Im also hoping that if we did get him there is a plan for a CB and midfield cover.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, let's push Liverpool and their agents all the way with this.

Celebration May4Th GIF by LEGO

 

 

Worst case, they have to pay more for someone they're pretending not to be interested in. And with Isak, we still hold all the cards either way, for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sir Toon said:

This has a sense of the Owen deal in that he didn't want to come and then we had that overnight saga of expecting him to go to the scousers before him rocking up here.  We all know how that played out.

 Eh? I’ve read some false equivalence statements on this forum before, but this is immediately right up there in the top 5

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Mazzy said:

If this is true. Wasn't that his release clause?

 

I'll take this rumour with a pinch of salt but that's a massive increase in bid if correct.

 

Screenshot_20250716-120654.thumb.png.5ee54ab4441d0e1771067d2bad4b1bca.png

It is, but, it might be a case that we're offering a total package of 100m, but less up front, so not technically meeting the release clause. If the bid is real, which it probable isn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One way or another we'd getter get this guy now; to lose out on signing a player once may be regarded as a misfortune, to lose out twice looks like carelessness. To lose out three times indicates that your transfer policy isn't fit for purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

 Eh? I’ve read some false equivalence statements on this forum before, but this is immediately right up there in the top 5

Is 5th champions league this season? If so i'll take that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The Prophet said:

Tell you what, it's going to feel good when he comes off the bench for Isak v Celtic.

 

On the other hand its going to feel awful when Isak isn't in the squad for that game though..... 👀 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...