Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, David Edgar said:

 

Willock had a great first half?  Best he's had in months.

 

I reckon we see the same midfield 3 again against West Ham.  They kinda deserve it and I get the argument for allowing Bruno to get up to speed.

 

 

 

Think great first half is pushing it like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, David Edgar said:

 

Yeah, it is like part from watching him to try to get into decent pressing positions and part thinking what it can be like to come into a tight game when the opposition team are playing at a really high tempo.  You hear about players needing to get into the rhythm of a game and sometimes that can be easy, like say against Everton when we had a comfy lead and their players were really stodgy, then say today when Villa were hitting quick passes and still charging on.  It is not a criticism of him in any way.  Just that in the context of today's game, he was a little behind the pace of the play.  There was a bit where he went pressing high up the pitch, but was like 5 yards away from any meaningful position on each press.  Nothing against him at all, just that can happen when you have sat on your arse for 90 minutes and then been told to get on and you really want to make an impact, but end up wasting your energy.  It was a really throw away minor thing that is getting blown out of proportion.  If you carry on reading my post, you see that I point out that he nailed every single in possession play he had.  Was just off the ball, he wasn't quite on it given the difficult circumstances.

 

 

 

 

I get your point, however my take on it is that he was the only player that was pressing the ball in those situations, and it will be easy for the Villa players to pass and keep him 5 yards away no matter how fast or on the pace he would be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like going on a blind date and just before you've said a word the girl across the floor you're meeting up with screams fuck off ya cunt. You're an asshole. 

 

 

Edited by Ikon

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Manxst said:

Price is irrelevant if someone is playing well.  A change will come, whether that be form, injury, formation, suspension etc, but it’s not deserved right now to drop any of the midfield three. 

Wilock hasn't been anything special though, he's been poor most of the season and although he has improved lately he's hardly setting the place alight is he. I mentioned the price because it it does give an indication that we rate him higher than Joe Wilock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, buzza said:

Can´t blame eddie for staying with the same midfield, if, as it seems, bruno is going to occupy willock´s position, it will be hard for him to displace him. If willock gets a goal he will be on fire again, he is getting great late runs in on goal and it´s just a matter of time, probably needs bruno´s through balls to help him out.

Shelvey had a very good game today, even tracked his runners, so i cab´t fault him at all.


I am surprised to read this. Bruno is leagues ahead of Willock in every possible way. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WillingtonMag said:

Wilock hasn't been anything special though, he's been poor most of the season and although he has improved lately he's hardly setting the place alight is he. I mentioned the price because it it does give an indication that we rate him higher than Joe Wilock.

Price means that’s what we bought him for, and what he was sold for, not how much we rate him. See Trippier for £12m and Wood for £25m. For what it’s worth, I think we’ll see a change soon, but that’s simply because someone will need a break, otherwise why change a winning team just for the sake of it? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Manxst said:

Price means that’s what we bought him for, and what he was sold for, not how much we rate him. See Trippier for £12m and Wood for £25m. For what it’s worth, I think we’ll see a change soon, but that’s simply because someone will need a break, otherwise why change a winning team just for the sake of it? 

It isn't just for the sake of it, its because we have a better player on the bench. For the sake of it would be swapping two players of similar skill or class. We play West Ham next who are a lot better than Everton and Villa we need all the quality we have on the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s crap man management to drop someone who is playing well and doing the job asked of him in a team that’s just picked up 6 points in the last week. Willock has been really good recently. Bruno will get a chance. Calm the fuck down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, christ said:

It’s crap man management to drop someone who is playing well and doing the job asked of him in a team that’s just picked up 6 points in the last week. Willock has been really good recently. Bruno will get a chance. Calm the fuck down.

I'm perfectly calm i just don't agree with that argument ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Howe has been blessed by the fact we've won games so the necessity to throw him in isn't there. 

 

I think introducing him slowly is a solid approach for now. Jurgen Klopp has done similar in the past wit the likes of Andy Robertson and it does tend to benefit them in the long run. If he was an attacker I'd say throw him in, but given the responsibility and importance a CM carries with team structure I think it's smart to let him bed in and learn the system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WillingtonMag said:

It isn't just for the sake of it, its because we have a better player on the bench. For the sake of it would be swapping two players of similar skill or class. We play West Ham next who are a lot better than Everton and Villa we need all the quality we have on the pitch.

If we go by your argument about price, we should drop Shelvey (£12m was it?) rather than Willock at £25m, surely? And Big Joe at £40m would never get dropped! No…because we have to pick the best for the team, and at the moment, Howe believes the current three are a better choice than throwing Bruno in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Manxst said:

If we go by your argument about price, we should drop Shelvey (£12m was it?) rather than Willock at £25m, surely? And Big Joe at £40m would never get dropped! No…because we have to pick the best for the team, and at the moment, Howe believes the current three are a better choice than throwing Bruno in. 

The argument wasn't really about the price I said because he was a better player you've just jumped on the price thing and made a bigger point of it than I meant. I think he's head and shoulders above Joe Wilock and think you should pick your best players to win the next game and upsetting some one is unfortunate but the team comes first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Biggsbond14
16 minutes ago, WillingtonMag said:

The argument wasn't really about the price I said because he was a better player you've just jumped on the price thing and made a bigger point of it than I meant. I think he's head and shoulders above Joe Wilock and think you should pick your best players to win the next game and upsetting some one is unfortunate but the team comes first.

Did we lose today em no so it’s irrelevant 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have no opinion of him whatsoever just yet because we've literally only see him play a barely combined total of 12 mins... 

 

Let him play a half of football first never mind a game.. 

 

 

Edited by Amir_9

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...