Jump to content

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

I'm the only one making suggestions so I guess I'll take that feedback. :lol:

 

I'm not out waving placards about introducing a relegation play-off system (in truth, a European play-off would be the preferable place to introduce such a thing); it's just intended as a thought exercise around how certain alterations might benefit competition. I don't think "the format isn't broken" is a useful position to hold in this day and age when the nature of the game has changed so drastically over the last thirty years. However I accept @Kid Icarus's point that tinkering with the smaller things probably doesn't address the greater issues.

I'm here. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, maybe 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th? Winner gets Europa, losing finalist gets Conference? Means finishing 9th still gets you a shot at Europe, all the teams in that 9th-13th region of the table have more to play for, and it increases the chances of one or two of the ESL chums being denied a European place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yorkie said:

I don't know, maybe 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th? Winner gets Europa, losing finalist gets Conference? Means finishing 9th still gets you a shot at Europe, all the teams in that 9th-13th region of the table have more to play for, and it increases the chances of one or two of the ESL chums being denied a European place?

I was thinking 7-10 for Conference league. Gives most clubs in the league something to for fight for if they want it. I think finishing 6th and not qualifying for Europe at all is harsh.

 

Plus I genuinely think only a few clubs actively want Conference League (from a board perspective). So let's give them a greater chance at qualification.

 

I think soon the PL will have 5 CL places anyway. So 8th might be enough for Conference. Think that's next season? Based on 3 nations with highest co-efficient

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

What's the purpose of this question?

 

You said finishing 7th is hard. West Ham have achieved it. Why can't we? Why do we need a playoff to do it

 

 

Edited by joeyt

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, joeyt said:

 

You said finishing 7th is hard. West Ham have achieved it. Why can't we? Why do we need a playoff to do it

 

 

 

West Ham finished 6th the season prior and finished 7th while playing in Europe until April/May. West Ham have been a very good team for 2 years.

 

Again, what's your actual point?

 

We don't need a play-off for anything. But I think it would make the league more exciting and it increases our chances of qualifying for Europe. 1 is an opinion and I think the other is a fact.

 

 

Edited by The College Dropout

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

West Ham finished 6th the season prior and finished 7th while playing in Europe until April/May. West Ham have been a very good team for 2 years.

 

Again, what's your actual point?

 

My point is that you said 7th is difficult without a playoff when it clearly isn't when teams like West Ham can get to 7th (or higher) two seasons in a row

 

That's not a knock on West Ham they're a good team but if we can't strive to be at the same level as what West Ham are at then what's the point of all our new investment?

 

We don't need a playoff system to get a Europa Conference League spot

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, joeyt said:

 

My point is that you said 7th is difficult without a playoff when it clearly isn't when teams like West Ham can get to 7th (or higher) two seasons in a row

 

That's not a knock on West Ham they're a good team but if we can't strive to be at the same level as what West Ham are at then what's the point of all our new investment?

 

We don't need a playoff system to get a Europa Conference League spot

We don't need a play-off for anything. But I think it would make the league more exciting and it increases our chances of qualifying for Europe. 1 is an opinion and I think the other is a fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rafalove said:

Also in the question of an all star game where does the north start?

 

10 most northernly  v 10 most southernly you'd say. The likes of Villa would probably chop and change. 

 

At least the North has a degree of kinship. Cant imagine Norwich and Southampton feel even slightly in the same boat. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

We don't need a play-off for anything. But I think it would make the league more exciting and it increases our chances of qualifying for Europe. 1 is an opinion and I think the other is a fact.

You said 7th is difficult when it clearly isn't with the right investment and coach

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, joeyt said:

You said 7th is difficult when it clearly isn't with the right investment and coach

Yeh it's difficult to get the right investment and coach.

 

Based on your logic - having a good manager and £200m investment in less than 12 months - we should finish 7th easily right? Anything less must be a failure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

Why would it be? 

 

 

:lol: A play off for 7th, essentially? A play off to join a third tier European competition. Sounds very small time to me. And more games in already packed schedule for players tom play and people to ultimately not be arsed about. 

 

Play offs in a top league are an awful idea. 

 

 

Edited by Super Duper Branko Strupar

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The College Dropout said:

Yeh it's difficult to get the right investment and coach.

 

Based on your logic - having a good manager and £200m investment in less than 12 months - we should finish 7th easily right? Anything less must be a failure.

 

This is an incredible strawman :lol: 7th easily? Where have I said that?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said:

 

 

:lol: A play off for 7th, essentially? A play off to join a third tier European competition. Sounds very small time to me. And more games in already packed schedule for players tom play and people to ultimately not be arsed about. 

 

Play offs in a top league are an awful idea. 

 

 

 

 

Turning our noses up at any European competition is the only thing that sounds mental to me. The Conference League was really good last year and the winners clearly assigned enormous weight it, as well they should have.

 

Take the point about amount of games, the calendar is obviously saturated. Probably not for those going for 7th, mind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt turn my nose up at the Conference League, I just cant see an argument for having play offs for it. These European places are historically assigned on merit over the course of the season by placing in the league. Having however many play offs for which ever coemptions just debases the league, imo. Not to mention if we got fucking 7th but had to go in to a play of with 8th and fucking lost. 

 

 

Edited by Super Duper Branko Strupar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theoretically if there was a north vs south game, using the club's below, with each team having to have 1 representative in the starting line-up, what would the two squads be?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...