Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is it too simplistic to say if Arsenal had Isak they'd win the league?

 

The absolute 100s of millions they've spent, their centre-forward situation is shocking.

 

 

Edited by Optimistic Nut

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arsenal have spent 750m in the last 5 years surely. 
 

in attacking areas they have bought:

Trossard

Havertz

Pepe

Gabby Jesus

 

Tbis is almost £200m worth of attacker. 
 

Edit: Odegaard brings it to £200 and makes it look a bit better. But not good enough for the money spent. 

 

 

Edited by The College Dropout

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Optimistic Nut said:

Is it too simplistic to say if Arsenal had Isak they'd win the league?

 

 

 

Yeh I think generally they’ve just struggled to create great chances this season.  With Partey and Zinchenko in midfield they were excellent at passing through the lines into space and they played more of a transition game. With Rice they have more control but don’t create as much. He’s not as good at those line breaking passes.  
 

if they had Isak though - they would obviously be better and closer to the title. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Is it too simplistic to say if Arsenal had Isak they'd win the league?

 

The absolute 100s of millions they've spent, their centre-forward situation is shocking.

 

 

 

Nah. Saliba, Rice and Saka are the only players good enough for a title winning side imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...