Nucasol Posted Monday at 18:47 Share Posted Monday at 18:47 24 minutes ago, Stifler said: If that doesn’t happen, then Palace would likely be forced to concede their European position, which would result in Nottingham Forest being upgraded to a Europa League slot, and Brighton of all clubs being given the Conference League slot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted Monday at 18:47 Share Posted Monday at 18:47 Twitter beef going on between Telegraph and Athletic journos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted Monday at 18:49 Share Posted Monday at 18:49 1 minute ago, Nucasol said: I know, but it would be hilarious if Palace lost their place due to their own accord to the team they randomly picked for a rival. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted Monday at 18:50 Share Posted Monday at 18:50 2 minutes ago, joeyt said: Twitter beef going on between Telegraph and Athletic journos Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted Monday at 20:14 Share Posted Monday at 20:14 What a lad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GideonShandy Posted Monday at 21:23 Share Posted Monday at 21:23 Favourites? Isak v. Liverpool Isak v. Arsenal Gordon v. Villa Tonali v. Brentford Murphy v. Leicester (Schar crossbar assist) Murphy v. Palace Schar v. Wolves Barnes v.Wolves Bruno v. Leicester Murphy v. Ipswich Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted yesterday at 06:30 Share Posted yesterday at 06:30 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted yesterday at 06:33 Share Posted yesterday at 06:33 10 hours ago, nemtizz said: What a lad. TLDR Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted yesterday at 13:19 Share Posted yesterday at 13:19 Law has been changed so that an accidental double touch on a penalty means it’s retaken, not a free kick to the defending team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted yesterday at 13:28 Share Posted yesterday at 13:28 9 minutes ago, NSG said: Law has been changed so that an accidental double touch on a penalty means it’s retaken, not a free kick to the defending team. Eh?! Does that apply to free-kicks as well? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted yesterday at 13:37 Share Posted yesterday at 13:37 8 minutes ago, Paully said: Eh?! Does that apply to free-kicks as well? No mate it says penalties Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 13:39 Share Posted yesterday at 13:39 The amount of advantages given to pen takers is getting a bit daft now like. Who is this change even for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted yesterday at 13:46 Share Posted yesterday at 13:46 Penalties only. Means it’s absolutely inevitable someone will score a double touch free kick next season now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted yesterday at 13:48 Share Posted yesterday at 13:48 7 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said: The amount of advantages given to pen takers is getting a bit daft now like. Who is this change even for? You'd imagine its following on from the Julien Alvarez incident in the penalty shootout against Real Madrid a few months back. I think I tend to agree with you mind, that was such a rarity that changing a rule because of it seems silly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted yesterday at 14:11 Share Posted yesterday at 14:11 34 minutes ago, tgarve said: No mate it says penalties ridiculous that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted yesterday at 14:14 Share Posted yesterday at 14:14 I think it's fair enough if you accidentally slip and touch it twice you get to retake it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted yesterday at 14:18 Share Posted yesterday at 14:18 28 minutes ago, 54 said: You'd imagine its following on from the Julien Alvarez incident in the penalty shootout against Real Madrid a few months back. I think I tend to agree with you mind, that was such a rarity that changing a rule because of it seems silly. Less rare with VAR. It would've been imperceptible without it. It was barely perceptible with it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted yesterday at 14:24 Share Posted yesterday at 14:24 (edited) The whole point of the double touch rule is to stop players taking the ball on and dribbling with it towards goal. The accidental double touch has always been an unfortunate punishment for this, but ultimately a necessary evil I guess. I really don't think a double touch penalty should mean it gets re-taken. However I would lean towards a rule that means it doesn't get ruled out if it's clearly all one movement/kick. The Alvarez one was the case in point here. To the naked eye it was demonstrably no different to a clean hit and shouldn't have been ruled out IMO. It was particularly egregious in this case because it was in a shootout where the ball is immediately dead anyway, and there is actually no reason to have the double touch rule enforced in that context. Edited yesterday at 14:25 by ponsaelius Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted yesterday at 14:24 Share Posted yesterday at 14:24 You can't tell me that if Isak accidentally slipped on a crucial penalty in a cup final and touched it twice that there wouldn't be any complaints on here It seems like common sense to me to update it? It's not like they're allowing people to tee themselves up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted yesterday at 14:28 Share Posted yesterday at 14:28 50 minutes ago, tgarve said: No mate it says penalties why do you regularly post snotty little remarks like this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted yesterday at 14:29 Share Posted yesterday at 14:29 (edited) 15 minutes ago, joeyt said: I think it's fair enough if you accidentally slip and touch it twice you get to retake it I don't really agree. Players can accidentally slip and skew it wide etc. I don't know why you'd give them a second bite of the cherry if they slip but are lucky enough to hit it twice by mistake in the process. That's just bailing out a fuck up. It should just be that an element of common sense is applied that the penalty is legit if it is taken in all one obvious movement, whether they score or not, and not afford them another go just because they slipped in very specific context of a double hit. Edited yesterday at 14:29 by ponsaelius Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 14:33 Share Posted yesterday at 14:33 6 minutes ago, joeyt said: You can't tell me that if Isak accidentally slipped on a crucial penalty in a cup final and touched it twice that there wouldn't be any complaints on here It seems like common sense to me to update it? It's not like they're allowing people to tee themselves up Just as easy to put us all in a position where it doesn't benefit us. ie the opposite of Mitrovic a couple of years back. Just seems like another change that wasn't needed and no one asked for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted yesterday at 14:35 Share Posted yesterday at 14:35 2 minutes ago, ponsaelius said: I don't really agree. Players can accidentally slip and skew it wide etc. I don't know why you'd give them a second bite of the cherry if they slip but are lucky enough to hit it twice by mistake in the process. That's just bailing out a fuck up. It should just be that an element of common sense is applied that the penalty is legit if it is taken in all one obvious movement, whether they score or not, and not afford them another go just because they slipped in very specific context of a double hit. What if the opposition have scuffed up the penalty run up in order to facilitate a slip? Would you have let Mitro retake the penalty he scored against us that then got disallowed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted yesterday at 14:36 Share Posted yesterday at 14:36 1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said: Just as easy to put us all in a position where it doesn't benefit us. ie the opposite of Mitrovic a couple of years back. Just seems like another change that wasn't needed and no one asked for. Mitro should have been allowed a retake if i was deciding the rules Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted yesterday at 14:38 Share Posted yesterday at 14:38 1 minute ago, joeyt said: Mitro should have been allowed a retake if i was deciding the rules Rather than just give the goal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now