The Europeometer™ (2024/25) - NUFC Qualify for Conference League (at least)

[Groundhog63]

2 hours ago, ChrisMcQuillan said:

Rashford out for the rest of the season.

 

He'll be back at Carrington then, no? 

[midds]

9 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said:

 

He'll be back at Carrington then, no? 

See? His body was actually trying hard and it eventually broke. Only took a few months too

 

Is it an option to sign him or an obligation? 

[Kanj]

With how the Liverpool front 3 are playing right now, I really see them taking max points for the rest of the season. 

[SteV]

27 minutes ago, midds said:

See? His body was actually trying hard and it eventually broke. Only took a few months too

 

Is it an option to sign him or an obligation? 

Option. Can’t see Villa get close to affording his wages permanently unless they make CL again.

[duo]

2 hours ago, ChrisMcQuillan said:

Rashford out for the rest of the season.

That probably helps their CL hopes as Watkins is a better player

[Holloway]

I wouldn't be backing Chelsea for top 4 if it was 180/1

[Groundhog63]

34 minutes ago, midds said:

See? His body was actually trying hard and it eventually broke. Only took a few months too

 

Is it an option to sign him or an obligation? 

Either way it's a win win for anyone but Villa and Man U 😂

[Sibierski]

Asensio and Rashford had a short term boost, but it’s going to end up not being worth the money wasted in the end.

[JigsawGoesToPieces]

3 hours ago, midds said:

See? His body was actually trying hard and it eventually broke. Only took a few months too

 

Is it an option to sign him or an obligation? 

 

 

 

 

Edited 17 hours ago by JigsawGoesToPieces

[Keegans Export]

13 hours ago, 54 said:

All it'll take is this:

 

Villa lose to Fulham

Chelsea lose to Liverpool 

Newcastle beat Brighton 

Newcastle beat Chelsea.

 

It's not likely, but that set of results is hardly beyond the realms of possibility.

 

13 hours ago, Stifler said:

Villa play twice before we play against Chelsea, Villa just need to drop points in either of those 2 games along with what you said in your other post.

I also believe Chelsea don’t need to get beaten by Liverpool, just not to beat Liverpool.

That's right, if we beat Brighton and Chelsea we'd be on 68.

 

Chelsea could get a maximum of 67 (draw vs Liverpool, win the last two) and Villa a maximum of 67 with three wins and a draw.

[The College Dropout]

14 hours ago, Sibierski said:

Asensio and Rashford had a short term boost, but it’s going to end up not being worth the money wasted in the end.

It’s already proved a worth while gamble. Gave them a real tilt in the CL, Cup and League. 
 

Biggest regret would be not getting a better option than Disasi

[Optimistic Nut]

1 minute ago, The College Dropout said:

It’s already proved a worth while gamble. Gave them a real tilt in the CL, Cup and League. 
 

Biggest regret would be not getting a better option than Disasi

 

They'd have got through Club Bruges with. I extra signings. CL qualification in the balance. Don't think it's worked out as well as expected on paper. 

[SteV]

1 hour ago, The College Dropout said:

It’s already proved a worth while gamble. Gave them a real tilt in the CL, Cup and League. 
 

Biggest regret would be not getting a better option than Disasi

Gave them a ‘tilt’, which unless they manage to qualify for CL, has effectively resulted in no material gain.

 

I don’t blame them for giving it a go, you can argue it’s to be applauded, but unless they make CL, it hasn’t been a successful gamble.

[The College Dropout]

Without the signings, we wouldn't be concerned about Villa at all. They wouldn't be in the chase.

 

If they get into CL or Europa*, it's because of the signings.

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by The College Dropout

[Geogaddi]

Man City and Forest are probably going to hit 70 points looking at the games they have left . Villa I can see getting at least another 10 which puts them on 67 but if they do win at Bournemouth we need 69.

 

I think Chelsea win the two home games against Liverpool and Man United but as long as we beat them we will finish above them . 6 points should probably be enough really provided we beat Chelsea but 7 will almost certainly be enough .

[TRon]

3 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

They'd have got through Club Bruges with. I extra signings. CL qualification in the balance. Don't think it's worked out as well as expected on paper. 

 

Depends if they make CL at the end of the day. If they don't, I think it will have been considered an expensive punt.

[TRon]

19 hours ago, Colos Short and Curlies said:

 

We'll also be second after beating Chelsea 

 

 

Chelsea are a difficult team to predict. They haven't played well this season, but they still have around the same points as us. It's a squad full of expensive players, I am always wary of teams like that, because on the day everything can just click and what looks like a win ends up being a draw, or something we don't even want to contemplate. I think we'll win, but it's a dangerous fixture.

[Optimistic Nut]

36 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

Depends if they make CL at the end of the day. If they don't, I think it will have been considered an expensive punt.

 

If they get CL football then it's paid off, though they're going to be doing it without a highly paid player if they do.

[AyeDubbleYoo]

1 hour ago, Geogaddi said:

Man City and Forest are probably going to hit 70 points looking at the games they have left . Villa I can see getting at least another 10 which puts them on 67 but if they do win at Bournemouth we need 69.

 

I think Chelsea win the two home games against Liverpool and Man United but as long as we beat them we will finish above them . 6 points should probably be enough really provided we beat Chelsea but 7 will almost certainly be enough .

I think that many teams on 70 would be by far the highest score ever needed. 

[The Prophet]

Remember in 22\23 when people thought Liverpool would win circa ten games in a row?

[Kid Icarus]

6 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Remember in 22\23 when people thought Liverpool would win circa ten games in a row?

Anah. I wonder where they got that idea from.

 

 

 

[Optimistic Nut]

Different circumstances mind, Liverpool that season were nowhere near the level of those seasons first 25-30 games. They'd lost 9 games before the run-in. 

 

 

Edited 58 minutes ago by Optimistic Nut

[Hanshithispantz]

Won't Villa make up the difference from the wages they're paying through merit payments for finishing higher in the league?

[Kid Icarus]

3 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Different circumstances mind, Liverpool that season were nowhere near the level of those seasons first 25-30 games. They'd lost 9 games before the run-in. 

 

 

 

Due to injuries and VVD not being right after his ACL mainly, but it was the experience and mentality of them knowing what needed to be done that made them very dangerous. They still ended up winning 7 and drawing 3 of the last 10 so we had to be on it.

[nufc123]

1 minute ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Won't Villa make up the difference from the wages they're paying through merit payments for finishing higher in the league?

Their CL run is worth a lot.