Jump to content

England’s Anthony Gordon


Recommended Posts

Can't describe how gutted I'd be if Gordon left, never mind to fucking Liverpool. :lol:

 

It's absolutely horrible atm, like. If him or Isak left it's enough to make you want to give up on the game. There's no way on earth we should be forced into that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Yorkie said:

Can't describe how gutted I'd be if Gordon left, never mind to fucking Liverpool. :lol:

 

It's absolutely horrible atm, like. If him or Isak left it's enough to make you want to give up on the game. There's no way on earth we should be forced into that. 

Only a couple of days of suffering left. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Optimum window to get a lot of people clicking on and reading articles due to this PSR thing. Trying to rile folks up.

 

Was just the other day the Chronicle was stating the ownership were very relaxed, approaching the deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Can't describe how gutted I'd be if Gordon left, never mind to fucking Liverpool. :lol:

 

It's absolutely horrible atm, like. If him or Isak left it's enough to make you want to give up on the game. There's no way on earth we should be forced into that. 

I’m done if we have to sell either of them (Bruno I could understand with the release clause).

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

How the fuck did we end up in this PSR mess? I thought we had intelligent owners now. 

 

 

 

Are we in a mess though? 

 

Is there any factual data available to show the predicted mess we are in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we starting to believe Craig Hope then we are really in trouble... 

 

He got lucky when he had a player leaking him inside information about Bruce but the story does not even make sense with regards to PSR.

 

He was a 40 million purchase so would need to be 70 /80 plus to get us as much profit as Mintah.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Shearergol said:

Personal opinion is the club are putting these false leaks out to draw attention to just how shit PSR is. Obviously that’s just a theory but there’s absolutely no chance we’d sell our player of the season, none.

If we do want to sell a player before 30 June it would make absolute sense to have as many options open to us as is possible, even if some of the potential departures are not likely or wanted to be sold by the club.

 

Having options strengthens out negotiating position for players we do want to sell and it also allows us to understand the relative merits of selling different players.

 

This 'process driven' cliche the club bang on about will involve assessing all available options for selling players before determining the best available option. 

 

That said, selling Gordon would likely be a disaster in both PR terms and on the pitch.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Butcher said:

Aye

 

If they believe they will be compliant if you include the sales from this summer not just the psr deadline date it makes some sense.  Forest lost 4 points as they delayed selling a player and as a result made significantly more money on him.  I think the premier league rules putting clubs in a position where they have to sell their assets at below market value could be challenged.  

 

Getting lots of evidence showing that they tried and clubs took advantage of the situation would help this appeal/case.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, madras said:

I'd imagine any offer would be explored. Can't think of any player in this country who is "no, not at any price"?

Gordon was our most creative outlet last season - even that 60 secs in England game you saw how crucial he is.  He is going nowhere. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said:

 

If they believe they will be compliant if you include the sales from this summer not just the psr deadline date it makes some sense.  Forest lost 4 points as they delayed selling a player and as a result made significantly more money on him.  I think the premier league rules putting clubs in a position where they have to sell their assets at below market value could be challenged.  

 

Getting lots of evidence showing that they tried and clubs took advantage of the situation would help this appeal/case.

 

 

 

Can’t see his full tweet but that makes zero sense. We need to balance the last 3 years books and the cut off is the 30th. What we do after the 30th has no impact as the reporting period is closed. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...