timeEd32 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 5 minutes ago, Andy84 said: If there is a victory for City surely there can’t be a rule that supersedes this ? My assumption is if there's any grey area in the ruling or if it was on a technicality then they will do everything they can to introduce a new rule on the right side of whatever line is drawn. Hopefully it's a resounding City victory combined with a lessening appetite for lawsuits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vexred Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 https://x.com/MikeKeegan_DM/status/1839288683414888575?t=1DCBl1oNvNAS3LUgczEdTQ&s=19 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maggies Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 (edited) Weren’t City after damages as well for loss of earnings. Let’s hope they’re substantial! Any idea on what the ATP votes was going to be about today? Edited September 26 by Maggies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stal Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 1 minute ago, Maggies said: Weren’t City after damages as well for loss of earnings. Let’s hope they’re substantial! Any idea on what the ATP votes was going to be about today? I would guess on whether they are to remain, go or change. Haven't seen anything else on it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Come on Citehhh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Every blade of grass, every brick, every sink, tap, urinal and shitter all sponsored by Sela and Friends. Let's go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 They could make life much easier if all 20 clubs agree on a set transfer limit that they all stick to and cant exceed over a calendar year or season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 3 minutes ago, Maggies said: Weren’t City after damages as well for loss of earnings. Let’s hope they’re substantial! Any idea on what the ATP votes was going to be about today? Yep - pressing for damages for rules that were brought in purposely to stifle them. A lot of PL clubs are going to be pissed their revenues are being spent on the mistakes made by Masters to ingratiate himself with his Cartel Chums once they see the PL clawing back legal rebates from the central pot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mondonewc Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Feels like a leap based on the info they're sharing to say this means City definitely won the case, how legit is this guy? Not just another clickbaiting wanker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Just now, NG32 said: They could make life much easier if all 20 clubs agree on a set transfer limit that they all stick to and cant exceed over a calendar year or season. Thats too much potential competition and these clubs do not want competition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 7 minutes ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said: are owners will be shitting it. No financial rules to hide behind 😈 This probably doesn't sweep the PSR and APT rules aside, it probably just takes the APT rules back to where they were a year ago, with the onus of the PL to prove that associated party transactions are not fair market value rather than on the clubs to prove they are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Just now, mondonewc said: Feels like a leap based on the info they're sharing to say this means City definitely won the case, how legit is this guy? Not just another clickbaiting wanker? Number of journos - Lawton, Keegan running with a similar briefing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 So how much does this help us ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mondonewc Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Just now, Nucasol said: Number of journos - Lawton, Keegan running with a similar briefing. This is always the pattern though right? One twat says something, rest of them jump on for the clicks. Nowhere is reporting it outside of Twitter? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: So how much does this help us ? Lee Ryder reckons upto 300m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 2 minutes ago, mondonewc said: This is always the pattern though right? One twat says something, rest of them jump on for the clicks. Nowhere is reporting it outside of Twitter? I thought Lawton was close to Chelsea/Villa so could be briefing through one of them. Villa definitely have an axe to grind with these rules. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: So how much does this help us ? I think we’ll find out in the next few months. There are some things that PIF inevitably need a lot of time on (e.g. the stadium) but increasing sponsor investment from people under their control is something they can do almost immediately Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 7 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: This probably doesn't sweep the PSR and APT rules aside, it probably just takes the APT rules back to where they were a year ago, with the onus of the PL to prove that associated party transactions are not fair market value rather than on the clubs to prove they are. This, hopefully Silverstone fancies doing some overtime if this ruling allows us more favourable sponsorships Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 11 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: This probably doesn't sweep the PSR and APT rules aside, it probably just takes the APT rules back to where they were a year ago, with the onus of the PL to prove that associated party transactions are not fair market value rather than on the clubs to prove they are. As has been saud many times. Its widely reported City were looking to get them scrapped completely. I'm not saying that is what's happened, but that was their aim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 1 minute ago, Scoot said: As has been saud many times. Its widely reported City were looking to get them scrapped completely. I'm not saying that is what's happened, but that was their aim. If the panel have agreed they are against competition law (which they are), then they have no choice but to scrap them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timeEd32 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 7 minutes ago, Pokerprince2004 said: Lee Ryder reckons upto 300m That's based on Dr. Rob Wilson's quotes: "If City win this APT case, and it allows APTs in the Premier League, then what we’ll see is some massive sponsorship deals signed almost immediately by Newcastle to boost their transfer budget for next summer. It wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if they spend over £300m on pure player transfers." That would mean, very roughly speaking, that we'd add about £150m in revenue instantly. I'm not sure how anyone lands at these assumptions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Seems far fetched Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 https://archive.is/pYTq0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Are we rich again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now