LFEE Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, David Edgar said: Time to fist everyone. Only if agreed and been blocked by the EPL. Which you’d like to think we have. Which also goes someways to explaining why the ones seen as easy wins were never announced. So a few if buts and maybes leading to a hopefully… hopefully Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 20 minutes ago, Maggies said: How does this work - the Premier League potentially going bust?! Man City can sue for a few years worth of sponsorship lost income. Everton and Forest will sue for their points deduction which made their league positions unstable, cost them final league placing, and forced them to sell players at potentially below market value. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 hour ago, BonesJones said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 https://www.thetimes.com/article/42e21a97-9bf6-48b6-a861-9afdc8b7c078?shareToken=84a28f1db90f539e610c33f6e4a984a1 Martyn Samuels Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myleftboot Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Man City have played a blinder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, LFEE said: Only if agreed and been blocked by the EPL. Which you’d like to think we have. Which also goes someways to explaining why the ones seen as easy wins were never announced. So a few if buts and maybes leading to a hopefully… hopefully I think that would be hard to govern. We for example could just say ‘Well we could have got that, but didn’t put it to the Premier League knowing their rules would block it’. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, Myleftboot said: Man City have played a blinder. As have us using them as our stalking horse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weznufc Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Does this help us? Or is it far too soon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christ Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 You imagine we’d have chucked in a couple of water testers to see where the line was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, Weznufc said: Does this help us? Or is it far too soon It will, but there are more steps to go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 45 minutes ago, JUICE690 said: Basically saying that although some rules were deemed to be unlawful it doesn't mean that the entire APT rulebook should be null and void. Though they said that before and now even the amended rules have been found to be unlawful. --- The 18-page final award, seen by Mail Sport, states: ‘In the First Partial Final Award it was declared that the APT Rules and Amended APT Rules were unlawful in three respects. ‘There now arises for decision the question whether those three respects can be severed from the remaining APT Rules so that those remaining APT Rules are valid and enforceable. ‘The three respects in which the APT Rules and Amended APT Rules were unlawful cannot be severed with the result that the APT Rules as a whole are void and unenforceable.’ --- Class that, cheers for summarising 👍🏻 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 What about future deals ? Could the training kit be sponsored tomorrow for metro money (hundreds of billions)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, Stifler said: I think that would be hard to govern. We for example could just say ‘Well we could have got that, but didn’t put it to the Premier League knowing their rules would block it’. Like I said… if buts and maybes. I do think personally you’d of had to of took it to them 2021-24. You couldn’t just say could’ve would’ve should’ve. IMO of course Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 7 minutes ago, JT24 said: the Messi of sports law has spoken. Haha got to love wor Nick, hates the Prem as much as us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 15 minutes ago, TBG said: Spent about £500 on merchandise this season. How do I put a claim in? Does that include Cliffy Ahmed’s old training jackets from eBay? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Does this mean we can have Anderson back? 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbydazzla Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 (edited) Dodgy cunts putting snide rules in place to protect a cartel, get exposed and legally defeated for being dodgy cunts putting snide rules in to protect a cartel SHOCK HORROR!!!! Edited February 14 by bobbydazzla Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 minute ago, LFEE said: Like I said… if buts and maybes. I do think personally you’d of had to of took it to them 2021-24. You couldn’t just say could’ve would’ve should’ve. IMO of course The argument would be that the Premier League misled clubs over the legal implications of their rules, and the fact clubs didn’t present bigger deals would actually be used as evidence towards the damage that they have inflicted. If I was a lawyer, it’s how I would be running with it, similar to coercion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 I mean it was fairly obvious from the offset what it was trying to do and who it was on behalf of. I reckon we’ve been working with City on this behind the scenes. Absolutely wouldn’t surprise me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 3 minutes ago, madras said: What about future deals ? Could the training kit be sponsored tomorrow for metro money (hundreds of billions)? Newcastle United training kit sponsored by Nexus. Free metro travel for all the players and senior staff. We made it lads and lasses Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 https://www.premierleague.com/news/4244928 Premier Leagues response - feels a bit Comical Ali to me 'nothing to see all is fine' Why is Sky Sports News still not mentioned it?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 5 minutes ago, LFEE said: Only if agreed and been blocked by the EPL. Which you’d like to think we have. Which also goes someways to explaining why the ones seen as easy wins were never announced. So a few if buts and maybes leading to a hopefully… hopefully To add more context to this. I mentioned months ago that I’d heard (can’t recall exactly where from) that we did have some big deals on the “hold pile” at the EPL which caused us to have the PSR imbalance of having to sell Minteh & Anderson to balance the books meanwhile. So hopefully we are one of the clubs who can claim for wrongful treatment 21-24. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 10 minutes ago, David Edgar said: Time to fist everyone. Is this slightly badly phrased and is actually 2 pronged: 1. Clubs can now arrange sponsor deals with companies connected to owners (which is great going forward!) And then separately.. 2. PL can't overrule the sums agreed for 21-24. (Great for anyone that the PL refused, or forced to accept a lower valued sponsorship deal) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Scenes when it turns out no APT deals were attempted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Hope we have our own evidence of blocked deals. Can’t help but feel we’ve been playing by the rules though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now