toontownman Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 It's a New Day! A new year.. Ready to get this transfer year started. So who are we selling to meet PSR next year? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazeT44 Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 (edited) We should have freed up a whole bunch of wages too (if reported wages are true)? Dummett 35k Karius 10k Anderson 30k Ritchie 45k Minteh 25k Hendrick 35k Hayden 22k Possible: Dubs 40k Almiron 60k Frazer 42k Could be potentially looking at 340k+ gone per week? Edited July 1 by BlazeT44 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 10 minutes ago, BlazeT44 said: We should have freed up a whole bunch of wages too (if reported wages are true)? Dummett 35k Karius 10k Anderson 30k Ritchie 45k Minteh 25k Hendrick 35k Hayden 22k Possible: Dubs 40k Almiron 60k Frazer 42k Could be potentially looking at 340k+ gone per week? 10 players for one week of a Casemiro. Quite frightening. Just shows how careful a club needs to be with its pay structure as it grows and aims to challenge the top of the divison. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Even this gobshite accepts PSR/FFP is protectionist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 He's been on a slow burning face turn for quite a while now. He's almost one of us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUHRLYASLEEVESUP Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Am I right in thinking this is the last year of PSR anyway ? Anchoring (I will set someone up for a funny) being season 25/26 ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 8 minutes ago, RUHRLYASLEEVESUP said: Am I right in thinking this is the last year of PSR anyway ? Anchoring (I will set someone up for a funny) being season 25/26 ? There’s a change to PSR being linked to a percentage of turnover, rather than losses of £105M over 3 years. i believe the anchoring proposal was not voted in at the last PL owners meeting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weezertron Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 4 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said: There’s a change to PSR being linked to a percentage of turnover, rather than losses of £105M over 3 years. i believe the anchoring proposal was not voted in at the last PL owners meeting Does that potential change still only benefit the top 4/5? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Well who has the biggest turnover to spend 70% of? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 3 minutes ago, Weezertron said: Does that potential change still only benefit the top 4/5? Benefits all, just not Man City. Because I think they’re at the limit of the proposal, whilst others got some room to grow, and likes of us and Villa, plenty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
healthyaddiction Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 24 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said: He's been on a slow burning face turn for quite a while now. He's almost one of us. Crazy thing is when you read who is partner is and discover he's not the biggest wanker in his household. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 7 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said: There’s a change to PSR being linked to a percentage of turnover, rather than losses of £105M over 3 years. i believe the anchoring proposal was not voted in at the last PL owners meeting It's not rather, it's both percentage of turnover and allowable loses, mirroring the UEFA system. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonas Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Weezertron said: Does that potential change still only benefit the top 4/5? of course, every change benefits them or else things would be left well enough alone Edited July 1 by Jonas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 (edited) 36 minutes ago, RUHRLYASLEEVESUP said: Am I right in thinking this is the last year of PSR anyway ? Anchoring (I will set someone up for a funny) being season 25/26 ? It's only a matter of time now before the whole thing is changed I believe. More clubs are being affected and the noise is growing more each day. An early catalyst could be the Man Ciry case. It's well over a week since it was concluded, and if they win the case, then the change will be pretty immediate. Edited July 1 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 6 minutes ago, et tu brute said: It's only a matter of time now before the whole thing is changed I believe. More clubs are being affected and the noise is growing more each day. An early catalyst could be the Man Ciry case. It's well over a week since it was concluded, and if they win the case, then the change will be pretty immediate. It certainly will in relation to ATP rules, I’m surprised there’s been no leaks…….might still be a few weeks before a determination is made, not that it’ll be announced. If City wins the ATP rules they want to bring in won’t go ahead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghandis Flip-Flop Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 10 minutes ago, et tu brute said: It's only a matter of time now before the whole thing is changed I believe. More clubs are being affected and the noise is growing more each day. An early catalyst could be the Man Ciry case. It's well over a week since it was concluded, and if they win the case, then the change will be pretty immediate. They weren’t challenging the whole construct though, just the associated party transaction part of it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boey_Jarton Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 5 hours ago, LFEE said: Maguire is always absolutely spot on when he talks about FFP and PSR. If you want a better set of rules for PSR, you must start by defining the problem you are trying to solve. The current rules were designed to placate a small set of clubs from forming a breakaway league, they were not designed to promote fairness or sustainability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pancrate1892 Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 3 hours ago, LFEE said: 10 players for one week of a Casemiro. Quite frightening. Just shows how careful a club needs to be with its pay structure as it grows and aims to challenge the top of the divison. Yet we are the only cunts having to sell people Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 9 minutes ago, Boey_Jarton said: Maguire is always absolutely spot on when he talks about FFP and PSR. If you want a better set of rules for PSR, you must start by defining the problem you are trying to solve. The current rules were designed to placate a small set of clubs from forming a breakaway league, they were not designed to promote fairness or sustainability. Just like the Champions league and it's various formats was designed to stop an ESL........by being an ESL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 2 minutes ago, Pancrate1892 said: Yet we are the only cunts having to sell people Villa have, Forest did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 41 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said: They weren’t challenging the whole construct though, just the associated party transaction part of it Once one part fails it open a massive gap. If one legal challenge is seen as non competitive then others will follow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey47 Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Can anyone re-explain for a dummy how exactly the new PSR rules work, or where to find the info so I can read it myself? Sorry, I know it’s probably been explained hundreds of times in here already Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt1892 Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 The Athletic article doesn’t put the club in the best of light behind the scenes, the last week must have been difficult but hopefully it makes us more open to selling players at the right time going forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 1 hour ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said: They weren’t challenging the whole construct though, just the associated party transaction part of it That's all we'd need. Opens up so many avenues for us if they win that arbitration. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted July 1 Share Posted July 1 Just now, Scoot said: That's all we'd need. Opens up so many avenues for us if they win that arbitration. PSR superficially goes away because PIF companies can sponsor the shit out of us, inflating incomes into the Cartel 6 bracket. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now