Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

Financial Fair Play / Profit & Sustainability

Mattoon

by Mattoon
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

timeEd32

timeEd32

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:08, Andy84 said:

If there is a victory for City surely there can’t be a rule that supersedes this ?

Expand  

 

My assumption is if there's any grey area in the ruling or if it was on a technicality then they will do everything they can to introduce a new rule on the right side of whatever line is drawn.

 

Hopefully it's a resounding City victory combined with a lessening appetite for lawsuits.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Stal

Stal

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:18, Maggies said:

Weren’t City after damages as well for loss of earnings. Let’s hope they’re substantial!

 

Any idea on what the ATP votes was going to be about today?

 

 

 

Expand  

 

I would guess on whether they are to remain, go or change. Haven't seen anything else on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nucasol

Nucasol

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:18, Maggies said:

Weren’t City after damages as well for loss of earnings. Let’s hope they’re substantial!

 

Any idea on what the ATP votes was going to be about today?

 

 

 

Expand  

Yep - pressing for damages for rules that were brought in purposely to stifle them.

 

A lot of PL clubs are going to be pissed their revenues are being spent on the mistakes made by Masters to ingratiate himself with his Cartel Chums once they see the PL clawing back legal rebates from the central pot.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jackie Broon

Jackie Broon

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:13, KetsbaiaIsBald said:

 
 

are owners will be shitting it.   No financial rules to hide behind 😈

Expand  

 

This probably doesn't sweep the PSR and APT rules aside, it probably just takes the APT rules back to where they were a year ago, with the onus of the PL to prove that associated party transactions are not fair market value rather than on the clubs to prove they are.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nucasol

Nucasol

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:26, mondonewc said:

This is always the pattern though right? One twat says something, rest of them jump on for the clicks. Nowhere is reporting it outside of Twitter? 

Expand  

I thought Lawton was close to Chelsea/Villa so could be briefing through one of them. Villa definitely have an axe to grind with these rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites
gbandit

gbandit

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:25, SUPERTOON said:

So how much does this help us ?

Expand  

I think we’ll find out in the next few months. There are some things that PIF inevitably need a lot of time on (e.g. the stadium) but increasing sponsor investment from people under their control is something they can do almost immediately

Link to post
Share on other sites
janpawel

janpawel

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:24, Jackie Broon said:

 

This probably doesn't sweep the PSR and APT rules aside, it probably just takes the APT rules back to where they were a year ago, with the onus of the PL to prove that associated party transactions are not fair market value rather than on the clubs to prove they are.

Expand  

This, hopefully Silverstone fancies doing some overtime if this ruling allows us more favourable sponsorships

Link to post
Share on other sites
Scoot

Scoot

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:24, Jackie Broon said:

 

This probably doesn't sweep the PSR and APT rules aside, it probably just takes the APT rules back to where they were a year ago, with the onus of the PL to prove that associated party transactions are not fair market value rather than on the clubs to prove they are.

Expand  

 

As has been saud many times. Its widely reported City were looking to get them scrapped completely. I'm not saying that is what's happened, but that was their aim.

Link to post
Share on other sites
timeEd32

timeEd32

Posted
Posted
  On 26/09/2024 at 13:29, Pokerprince2004 said:

 

Lee Ryder reckons upto 300m

 

 

 

Expand  

 

That's based on Dr. Rob Wilson's quotes: 

 

"If City win this APT case, and it allows APTs in the Premier League, then what we’ll see is some massive sponsorship deals signed almost immediately by Newcastle to boost their transfer budget for next summer. It wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if they spend over £300m on pure player transfers."

 

That would mean, very roughly speaking, that we'd add about £150m in revenue instantly. I'm not sure how anyone lands at these assumptions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...