Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't be too arsed for seeing 3 CB's on the park plus a couple of full backs personally. 

 

As the likes of Arteta has alluded to pretty recently teams play about 30 or 40 formations during a game anyway these days, you want players who can go and play in a raft of those and go and do a shift in a loads of areas during a game. 

 

A "shape" of 3-5-2/3-4-3 is already played by us during games about 20 times but it is just used with the likes of Bruno taking the ball rather than someone like Kelly seeing more of it, or as has happened in the team posted above basically Kelly on the pitch at expense of Barnes, I would take a hard pass on that, I don't think that makes us better personally. 

 

 

Edited by JEToon

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Heron said:

He is. I'm not disputing that.

 

It's just funny that when someone like Longstaff makes themselves available for the ball and gets in good positions that element of his game is entirely overlooked in any critiquing by certain folk and the focus then switches to how shit he was with the ball in whatever given circumstance. Yet for someone like Tonali, who we should rightly expect more of because he's a better player - folk switch to whatever positive spin they want to put on it.

 

If a player is passing the ball lots and accurately then surely that suggests he is also readily available to receive the ball. Yet the same "makes himself available" seemingly isn'tever attributed to someone like Longstaff.

 

Make no qualms about it. Tonali is a better player, by some stretch. I just feel that there's some discrepancy on how players are judged that's all.

Part of the frustration is that Eddie seems to have a much longer leash for Sean. We all know it takes raw reps to get up to speed in the league, and Tonali, in some large part due to his own gambling issue, has yet to be given an extended run to really bed in.
 

Would like to see him given a stretch of games so that he has an actual chance to adjust to prem play. A game or two, followed by a benching for not meeting our standards, not only feels unduly harsh given the leash others are provided, but also just poor management.

 

We should be doing everything in our power to get Sandro up to speed because he's one of the few players we have who, by his talent alone, can singlehandedly impact the game and our fortunes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not being funny, but could Bunce be a factor in Tonali's limited minutes? I'm giving a lot of leeway on decisions like minutes and games played for our players this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking him off was a shocking decision.... He'd moved more central too and was playing really well.

 

Then Bruno went off and I was even more perplexed.

 

Perhaps it's because they'd played for their countries?

 

Still wouldn't have taken them off.

 

Isak would have been first off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bizarre decision to take him off. He’s been back going on 2 months and it wasn’t even an injury. Gets his 90s for Italy and we seem to have to restrict his minutes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a damn #10 that can play between the lines of Isak and our CM. He would be able to play those neat short one touch line braking passes way more often. Also make Isak less isolated. Or at least a creative attacking midfielder so that we can have some more depth in our play going forward. Too predictable now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ikon said:

Get a damn #10 that can play between the lines of Isak and our CM. He would be able to play those neat short one touch line braking passes way more often. Also make Isak less isolated. Or at least a creative attacking midfielder so that we can have some more depth in our play going forward. Too predictable now. 

We’ve built a squad without a 10 and without a RW.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, lovejoy said:

Our set pieces are fucking awful as well at the min. Surely he'll be put on them soon?


Said this a few weeks back - our set pieces (corners, crosses) are the worst in the league imo - absolutely honking 

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, lovejoy said:

Our set pieces are fucking awful as well at the min. Surely he'll be put on them soon?

I’d love to know what we do on the training ground for them. They are easily the worst in the league.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I’d love to know what we do on the training ground for them. They are easily the worst in the league.

 

There was a time when we were so inventive with them. Where the fuck did that go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mikky said:


Said this a few weeks back - our set pieces (corners, crosses) are the worst in the league imo - absolutely honking 

Can't work it out, trippier got worse by the week and hall was bad today. Bruno, tonali fuck even schar can put a good ball in. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Mikky said:


Said this a few weeks back - our set pieces (corners, crosses) are the worst in the league imo - absolutely honking 


I’ve said this half a dozen times but whoever is responsible for them is fucking shit at their job. They’re the worst I’ve ever seen them for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ikon said:

Get a damn #10 that can play between the lines of Isak and our CM. He would be able to play those neat short one touch line braking passes way more often. Also make Isak less isolated. Or at least a creative attacking midfielder so that we can have some more depth in our play going forward. Too predictable now. 

 

I hear you but the 10 is a dead position currently. Can't think of many 10s in the modern game. Especially in England. I'm playing devils advocate as I agree we need a link between cm and cf. I think the easier and more logical option is to get a traditional cdm who frees Bruno up to play that type of role. What do I know I'm just a football manager addict. Id like to see a proper disrupter who plays as a 3rd CB when needed. Joelinton is a box to box. We need a player who sits back. Just my observation 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 19/10/2024 at 22:55, Sufi said:

 

I hear you but the 10 is a dead position currently. Can't think of many 10s in the modern game. Especially in England. I'm playing devils advocate as I agree we need a link between cm and cf. I think the easier and more logical option is to get a traditional cdm who frees Bruno up to play that type of role. What do I know I'm just a football manager addict. Id like to see a proper disrupter who plays as a 3rd CB when needed. Joelinton is a box to box. We need a player who sits back. Just my observation 

I think Tonali looked decent playing deepest. Maybe we could have Tonali central and release Bruno further forward.

 

Would like to see a midfield three of Willock - Tonali - Bruno at some point. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Vaj said:

I think Tonali looked decent playing deepest. Maybe we could have Tonali central and release Bruno further forward.

 

Would like to see a midfield three of Willock - Tonali - Bruno at some point. 

Willock was totally and utterly anonymous on Saturday, while Joelinton was everywhere from the first minute. But you do you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...