Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

NUFC Transfer Rumours

Guest

by Guest
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

rebelrouser

rebelrouser

Posted
Posted

Only one source actually said £100k and some others ran with it.  Someone previously questioned whether that was true, and I am starting to believe it was not. Just does not make sense generally and given the other players' wages.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rebelrouser said:

Only one source actually said £100k and some others ran with it.  Someone previously questioned whether that was true, and I am starting to believe it was not. Just does not make sense generally and given the other players' wages.  

It is 100% not true 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sufi

Sufi

Posted
Posted (edited)

Would be interested in Branthwaite from Everton. Caught my eye playing for England last summer and looked good apart from the Isak goal when we played them. Wonder if he has a relegation release clause. Could be a future England CB. 

 

 

Edited by Sufi

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mikky

Mikky

Posted
Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, Sufi said:

Would be interested in Branthwaite from Everton. Caught my eye playing for England last summer and looked good apart from the Isak goal when we played them. Wonder if he has a relegation release clause. Could be a future England CB. 

 

 

 


He’s a great talent but if we iare FFP hamstrung are better shopping abroad 

 

 

Edited by Mikky

Link to post
Share on other sites
Paully

Paully

Posted
Posted (edited)

As I’ve just said in the boozer; how on earth are we having the conversation as to who should we have to sell out of Bruno or Isak in order to progress?! Richest club in the world needs to sell one of their two best players to ‘progress’?! Absolutely ludicrous! 

 

 

Edited by Paully

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sufi

Sufi

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Paully said:

As I’ve just said in the boozer; how on earth are we having the conversation as to who should we have to sell out of Bruno or Isak in order to progress?! Richest club in the world needs to sell one of their two best players to ‘progress’?! Absolutely ludicrous! 

 

 

 


There’s no chance either of them are sold unless it comes from them(which I doubt since they both seem to love the club and believe in the project). We are in need of relief under FFP but Bruno Tino and Isak are untouchable. 
 

I wouldn’t be surprised if we could raise 50-60m just getting rid of depth. Already got revenue streams coming by way of sponsorship deals and kit maker etc. 

 

I think people just want to play football manager in their minds and thinking in hypotheticals. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
BonesJones

BonesJones

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Sufi said:

I wouldn’t be surprised if we could raise 50-60m just getting rid of depth. Already got revenue streams coming by way of sponsorship deals and kit maker etc. 

 

What's this 'depth' you speak of?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sufi

Sufi

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, BonesJones said:

 

What's this 'depth' you speak of?


? fair point. I mean players who SHOULD be depth but have been thrust into first team football due to an injury crisis of biblical proportions. 
 

Basically half of our lineup from the past few months.
 

I’d keep Schar/Botman/Burn.. obviously the first two are more than depth and hopefully Botman can return to his form from last season. 

 

Longstaff I’d be okay with him going. Dubravka if anyone wants him. The full backs we (hopefully) won’t be using in the future. Krafth, Targett. Would also be nice to move on from Lascelles but I’m not sure what his timeline is injury wise (same goes for Wilson) Almiron will be hard to part with because I love his enthusiasm but I’d accept anything above 20-25m. Murphy could have some interest from newly promoted sides. 

 

Some of these will probably need part of their wages paid in order for them to move but if it isn’t too much I don’t see why not. 

 

 

Edited by Sufi

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sufi

Sufi

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kingxlnc said:

Would anyone consider Jason Sancho for RW? He’s available for £34m.

 

Get his head right and could be a great signing?


Hell no BUT I’d only consider it because part of me would absolutely love it if he came here and performed very well…just to spite his former side and their insufferable fanbase. 
 

We don’t have enough freedom to be spending 34m on projects like him. Plus his attitude seems shit.

 

I’d Take Neto on the right but he’s always injured. 
 

We will probably end up signing some random RW who none of us have ever seen play. My guess is bundesliga. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
ExiledGeordie

ExiledGeordie

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Only one source actually said £100k and some others ran with it.  Someone previously questioned whether that was true, and I am starting to believe it was not. Just does not make sense generally and given the other players' wages.  


I can’t fathom why they would’ve put Targett on 100k per week? Seems bonkers and highly unlikely 

Link to post
Share on other sites
TRon

TRon

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Paully said:

As I’ve just said in the boozer; how on earth are we having the conversation as to who should we have to sell out of Bruno or Isak in order to progress?! Richest club in the world needs to sell one of their two best players to ‘progress’?! Absolutely ludicrous! 

 

 

 

 

It's getting beyond annoying now, these rules were supposed to protect clubs from themselves, not stunt their growth and kill healthy investement into a football club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...