The Prophet Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 2 minutes ago, Ikon said: Not for sale! If any club wants him then it has to be ludicrous money. 180m+ and I’d be as ok as it’s possible to be even though it would suck in many ways. Mostly depends on how we would decide to spend that money though….. Scot Wilson (I know, I know) claims we'd demand £200 million plus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, The Prophet said: Scot Wilson (I know, I know) claims we'd demand £200 million plus. Not at all surprised. That's the right response for any discussion to sell to any rival in the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 3 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Scot Wilson (I know, I know) claims we'd demand £200 million plus. £200m isn't enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 4 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Scot Wilson (I know, I know) claims we'd demand £200 million plus. Love it. The right way to go. Either we keep him which is the best option or we sell for an obscene amount that is “understandable”. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upthemags Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, Dr.Spaceman said: £200m isn't enough. 200m would be destiny changing for the club and its transfer business Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Just now, Upthemags said: 200m would be destiny changing for the club and its transfer business Huge risk, we need to sign a great striker to change our destiny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upthemags Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Just now, Dr.Spaceman said: Huge risk, we need to sign a great striker to change our destiny. I don't disagree - having the reserves of cash is one thing, but spending in a way that replaces the void that would be left is an entirely separate challenge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 hour ago, Unbelievable said: Quite probably aye. Let’s hope so anyway Isak going nowhere. Stake my house on it. People need to chill. Just the product of modern day social media. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 To sign a striker at the very least as good as Isak would cost around the fee we get for him and that kind of striker will not want to come here, especially as long as we're not in the CL. Complete non starter regardless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 £200m plus Palmer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, NSG said: £200m plus Palmer. Add Tosin in for the laughs. Three seasons back, this would have been team-changing. Now, we are however quoted higher for any players we want (cos Newcastle) and having 200m more will only prompt clubs to raise their asking prices especially we would only have an injury-prone Wilson left. Plus I would like to keep our core players like Isak, Bruno and Gordan if we are to become a force in future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Quite liked the idea of having to 2nd ir 3rd best striker in the world. 200m in our back pocket would be robbed pretty quickly. And finally, my hope is that this is agent posturing during salary negotiations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 I'd bite at 200m, until I realized Chelsea would be spreading the payments over 200 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DahnSahf Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 2 hours ago, Rich said: Yeah, he's fine. Thanks for asking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 The day after Brunos clause expires. Imagine my shock to see stuff about isak leaving Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 The fact football is now more a conversation about PSR and Related Party Transactions and other absurdly invented / crafted "sustainability" measures is absolutely boring and appalling. Fuck clean off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 18 minutes ago, toontownman said: I'd bite at 200m, until I realized Chelsea would be spreading the payments over 200 years. As far as FFP is concerned we'd have all the money now and could spread it over long contracts ourselves meaning we'd basically have zero FFP limits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallumG6 Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Chelsea are the absolute epitome of everything that's wrong with football nowadays. They need swiftly sending into orbit! Yank coming in and throwing money at things until it works out, it's the American method of operation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 2 hours ago, The Prophet said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey47 Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Not saying we would or should sell Isak, but if it were to happen for say 180 million. Who could we even sign at a similar age or younger than Isak who could also score 20 in the premier league? And also as other mentioned this player would have to be willing to play a year with no European football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 Enquired about Tomori mentioned in this piece: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 27 minutes ago, Joey47 said: Not saying we would or should sell Isak, but if it were to happen for say 180 million. Who could we even sign at a similar age or younger than Isak who could also score 20 in the premier league? And also as other mentioned this player would have to be willing to play a year with no European football. Strikers like Gyokeres and Evanilson would come into play I'd imagine. Impossible to say if they'd come in and score 20 straight away. If we want a guaranteed performer in the Prem, would probably bring back Toney. Hopefully we just keep Isak though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamPS Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 I’d love Bellingham, I’ve never seen him play but if would wind the mackems up no end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 1 minute ago, WilliamPS said: I’d love Bellingham, I’ve never seen him play but if would wind the mackems up no end. Think Rigg would wind them up even more fingers crossed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunk Moreland Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 32 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Enquired about Tomori mentioned in this piece: £40m seems rather reasonable compared to stupid prices quoted for other options. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now