NUFC Transfer Rumours

[AyeDubbleYoo]

48 minutes ago, LFEE said:

Just PSR reality dawning. Not just for us as fans but dare I say even a bit for EH as it’s probably not ideal how he builds his teams and camaraderie.  

 

I think it's squad spaces as well, particularly at RW. You can't have Miggy, Murphy and a new signing when only one will play. 

[gdm]

Getting concerned now that we won’t be signing a winger.

 

Really will sting for me especially with Minteh sold 

[LFEE]

1 hour ago, LFEE said:

Just PSR reality dawning. Not just for us as fans but dare I say even a bit for EH as it’s probably not ideal how he builds his teams and camaraderie.  

 

 

[Gawalls]

He’s not wrong - at the moment there’s a bit of a stalemate as every club is wanting to sell at old prices but buy at knocked down prices because of par. Something needs to give.

[SUPERTOON]

Just now, Gawalls said:

He’s not wrong - at the moment there’s a bit of a stalemate as every club is wanting to sell at old prices but buy at knocked down prices because of par. Something needs to give.

Stalemate how? Some big moves have already happened, or are in the process.

[Gawalls]

1 minute ago, SUPERTOON said:

Stalemate how? Some big moves have already happened, or are in the process.

There will always be some but the number of deals is right down on every window it seems. And a lot of them were forced sales that normally wouldn’t happen.

 

 

Edited August 9, 2024 by Gawalls

[The Prophet]

 

[jack j]

Wonder how they come up with them 2 names

On a day where both them clubs happen to be spending 60 million on attackers

[St1pe]

Could be wrong but Nufcblog just peddle any old nonsense. 
 

For what it’s worth both would improve us. 

[SUPERTOON]

1 minute ago, The Prophet said:

 

Would trust how to improve both massively tbh.

[The Prophet]

3 minutes ago, St1pe said:

Could be wrong but Nufcblog just peddle any old nonsense. 
 

For what it’s worth both would improve us. 

 

They seem well connected to the youth side of things, but yeah not the most reliable.

[Ginola]

He'd be an improvement on our current options but I really don't rate Kulusevski at all

[TRC]

Kulusevski has been starting upfront for Spurs in preseason.

[Upthemags]

9 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

Would trust how to improve both massively tbh.

Kulu would be an A+ signing. Don't feel we have what tottenham likely would ask though

[Dr.Spaceman]

7 minutes ago, Ginola said:

He'd be an improvement on our current options but I really don't rate Kulusevski at all

 

He's class, so comfortable on the ball.

[KaKa]

Madueke can be all over the place at times., and can be frustrating to watch. I could see him come in and do well, as there's ability there, but he'll always be a bit hit and miss.

 

Kulusevski can look brilliant at times, but then can also sometimes drift through games and not be as effective. Love his profile as a player though.

 

Would definitely opt for Kulusevski between the two. I think if we can get some consistency and a bit more confidence into him, it could be an incredible return that we benefit from at a whole different level.

[SUPERTOON]

Just now, KaKa said:

Madueke can be all over the place at times., and can be frustrating to watch. I could see him come in and do well, as there's ability there, but he'll always be a bit hit and miss.

 

Kulusevski can look brilliant at times, but then can also sometimes drift through games and not be as effective. Love his profile as a player though.

 

Would definitely opt for Kulusevski between the two. I think if we can get some consistency and a bit more confidence into him, it could be an incredible return that we benefit from at a whole different level.

Out of the two, I think Madueke is the most realistic. Think Chelsea would be more open to a deal similar to what we done for Hall.

[Pablo123]

Is Kulusevski quick? 

[Dwebbo]

Would absolutely love us to get Kulu

[nufc123]

5 minutes ago, Pablo123 said:

Is Kulusevski quick? 

No, but a very clever player. Works hard and very good technique.

[Geogaddi]

Genuine question as I don't really watch them but why do Spurs want rid of Kulusevski if he is as good as people make out?

[KaKa]

4 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

Out of the two, I think Madueke is the most realistic. Think Chelsea would be more open to a deal similar to what we done for Hall.

 

Yeah, maybe. Guess we'll have to wait and see.

 

There has consistently been reports that Kulusevski is available for around £40 million this summer though. Apparently, Ange prefers more direct and aggressive wingers for his system.

 

Kulusevski's style is more like what we would have got from Olise, and so it would make sense if there was interest there.

[Pablo123]

2 minutes ago, nufc123 said:

No, but a very clever player. Works hard and very good technique.

That's what I thought, but haven't seen loads of him. Very tidy player from what I've seen. 

[Menace]

4 minutes ago, Geogaddi said:

Genuine question as I don't really watch them but why do Spurs want rid of Kulusevski if he is as good as people make out?

 

He had a poor season last season, people are probably convinced Howe can get him firing again. Good player but blows hot and cold for me personally.

[Gallowgate Toon]

Kulu feels a bit position-less to me - not quite an AM, not quite a winger, not quite a CM - but he does have some guile & quality that he shows in streaks. Always seems to put the running in as well even if he's not firing.