NUFC Transfer Rumours

[Doc]

14 minutes ago, NE27 said:

 

Could that feasibly leave the atmosphere?

Of course it can, it’s a space elevator ffs. 🤦‍♂️ 

(Sorry, getting a bit tense over here.)

[Kanj]

6 minutes ago, J7 said:

To be fair to Jackson, he’s been linked with us, Villa, Milan, A. Madrid, Man Utd and Barcelona. Ornstein mentioned that he has good numbers and is seen more favourably by clubs than fans. 

Almost like career football scouts know more than fans in terms of talent id?

[andycap]

Some aren't looking at the big picture like. 

Isak wants away we are gonna lose him at some point, it's very rare to replace a beast of a striker with the same level of ability. 

Look at spurs as an example. 

We have to recruit what's available as ekitike Pedro sesko are gone. 

[NE27]

Just now, Doc said:

Of course it can, it’s a space elevator ffs. 🤦‍♂️ 

(Sorry, getting a bit tense over here.)

 

Don't worry about it buddy, tomorrow is a new day....

 

...to be publicly ridiculed for being rejected by Jackson.

[andycap]

So wissa as our ready made striker and a dearer one as the development striker.

Wissa will knock them in and gain us points keeping us competitive. 

[Shearergol]

2 minutes ago, andycap said:

Some aren't looking at the big picture like. 

Isak wants away we are gonna lose him at some point, it's very rare to replace a beast of a striker with the same level of ability. 

Look at spurs as an example. 

We have to recruit what's available as ekitike Pedro sesko are gone. 

Spurs had a great season 

[La Parka]

Tbh Jackson would be good, it's just Chelsea's pricing and the ick it gives me to fund their Littlewoods catalogue of talent they churn through each season. 

[Casey]

Yoane Wissa, the savior of our transfer winda. Wasnt what I expected like but sure, why not at this point 

[andycap]

Just now, Shearergol said:

Spurs had a great season 

Kane-richarlison-solanke

[gdm]

1 minute ago, andycap said:

Some aren't looking at the big picture like. 

Isak wants away we are gonna lose him at some point, it's very rare to replace a beast of a striker with the same level of ability. 

Look at spurs as an example. 

We have to recruit what's available as ekitike Pedro sesko are gone. 

Gonna lose Isak at some point yes. Doesn’t have to be this window. Doesn’t have to be when we are scraping the barrel for Jackson. 
 

it’s absolutely embarrassing. Liverpool have absolutely played with us and now Chelsea are too.  

[Doc]

3 minutes ago, NE27 said:

 

Don't worry about it buddy, tomorrow is a new day....

 

...to be publicly ridiculed for being rejected by Jackson.

🤣 Can’t wait mate. 

[lovejoy]

The good thing about Jackson would be a future Saudi move. He’d be ripe of that if it didn’t pan out.

[andycap]

Just now, gdm said:

Gonna lose Isak at some point yes. Doesn’t have to be this window. Doesn’t have to be when we are scraping the barrel for Jackson. 
 

it’s absolutely embarrassing. Liverpool have absolutely played with us and now Chelsea are too.  

Who else is there? The three we wanted have moved to new clubs. 

[Kid Icarus]

If we sell Isak and do this I want every person with the ability to approve it or veto it out of the club.

 

 

Edited August 6, 2025 by Kid Icarus

[Shearergol]

1 minute ago, andycap said:

Kane-richarlison-solanke

Can’t even work out what point you’re making? They lost a great striker to sign some absolute shite? Is that it?

[The Prophet]

Putting the insane price tag aside for a moment.

 

Jackson has lead the line for Chelsea in two top six finishes, scoring double figures in both.

 

Objectively, they always look a better side with him playing due to his tireless running and pressing.

 

Sure his composure needs some work and he is a hot head, but I don't understand folk going on like he's a total donkey. He'd do well for us and has scope to improve.

[lovejoy]

It should be Ollie Watkins replacing Isak at this stage. 100%.

[gdm]

1 minute ago, andycap said:

Who else is there? The three we wanted have moved to new clubs. 

Exactly. We keep Isak. 

[andycap]

Just now, Shearergol said:

Can’t even work out what point you’re making? They lost a great striker to sign some absolute shite? Is that it?

They lost kane and replaced him with richarlison which was a massive downgrade then Solanke. 

 

[Famous Nick]

good they sold Joao Felix otherwise they would now force us to buy him off of them...

[lovejoy]

Just now, The Prophet said:

Putting the insane price tag aside for a moment.

 

Jackson has lead the line for Chelsea in two top six finishes, scoring double figures in both.

 

Objectively, they always look a better side with him playing due to his tireless running and pressing.

 

Sure his composure needs some work and he is a hot head, but I don't understand folk going on like he's a total donkey. He'd do well for us and has scope to improve.

There’s a great article on him in the athletic about his work rate and ability to press.

 

£80m is the issue here. It’s mental money that.

[duo]

Just now, lovejoy said:

It should be Ollie Watkins replacing Isak at this stage. 100%.

There is no one else

[andycap]

Just now, gdm said:

Exactly. We keep Isak. 

What if he doesn't wanna play? 

[Jewel]

80m? So that's Delap and Pedro, bought and paid for. With scope to make further signings.

 

Its not that Jackson would be a bad signing at the right price, its the fact that we would be willing to help out Chelsea to such an extent. Would be infuriating.

[gdm]

Just now, andycap said:

What if he doesn't wanna play? 

I just don’t think that’s realistic. Don’t think he’ll waste a year of his career.