Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Recommended Posts

If I remember correctly the general feeling when Pope signed was that he wasn’t a significant upgrade on Dubravka, this turned out to be nonsense. He’s a much much better shot stopper and positional sense around the box adds so much so our back line.

 

But he can’t kick. He’s got those skinny little legs that for whatever reason he never chose to work on.

 

Can we work with that for another season? Sure.. but it means holding possession we need to play out from the back at all times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/05/2024 at 22:05, BlueLion said:

Two quality CBs and a RW is top priority this window. As for GK if a young upgrade for Dubravka is available then go for it. I also think selling barnes to raise funds would be best, and if necessary bruno. 

Expand  

The absolute state of it.

 

:facepalm:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/05/2024 at 22:05, BlueLion said:

Two quality CBs and a RW is top priority this window. As for GK if a young upgrade for Dubravka is available then go for it. I also think selling barnes to raise funds would be best, and if necessary bruno. 

Expand  

WTF Jog on buddy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/05/2024 at 22:05, BlueLion said:

Two quality CBs and a RW is top priority this window. As for GK if a young upgrade for Dubravka is available then go for it. I also think selling barnes to raise funds would be best, and if necessary bruno. 

Expand  

Give owa.

 

BlueLion = Chelsea supporter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy is just giving his opinion. As terrible as that opinion is he’s allowed it and telling him to jog on & fuck off hardly makes the place seem welcoming :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 27/05/2024 at 22:05, BlueLion said:

Two quality CBs and a RW is top priority this window. As for GK if a young upgrade for Dubravka is available then go for it. I also think selling barnes to raise funds would be best, and if necessary bruno. 

Expand  

If we sell Barnes we'd then need a LW too, doesn't make sense to do that

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 08:33, Geordie Ahmed said:

If we sell Barnes we'd then need a LW too, doesn't make sense to do that

Expand  

We have Gordon, both Joe's, Anderson who prefers to play wide left for starters. We didn't need Barnes when we bought him, he's a luxury signing to back up Gordon that maybe in 5 years we will be in a position to do. I like Barnes, over a season he'll probably outscore Gordon, but where do you play Gordon in that case. He certainly doesn't like playing on the right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 09:05, Away Toon said:

We have Gordon, both Joe's, Anderson who prefers to play wide left for starters. We didn't need Barnes when we bought him, he's a luxury signing to back up Gordon that maybe in 5 years we will be in a position to do. I like Barnes, over a season he'll probably outscore Gordon, but where do you play Gordon in that case. He certainly doesn't like playing on the right.

Expand  

 

Joelinton will play in midfield

Joe Willock unfortunately keeps breaking down, don't know if he can even stay fit

Anderson hasn't shown he is ready yet 

 

And most important of all it's about building your squad and having competition otherwise by asking where someone would play you can only justify having 11 players, which I'm sure you know is absurd.

 

We need to have 2 players for every position, so Gordon and Barnes are the two for LW, wanting Barnes sold is ludicrous

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree selling Barnes is absurd, it's just buying him when we did was more opportunist than a priority. It will be interesting to see what we do next season because both Barnes and Gordon should be starting and they both play the same position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Hall, Livro and Barnes were all opportunistic long term strategy buys last season - opportunities seen as too good to let go by. With Tonali being the ready to go straight into first team signing. 
 

I think/hope that’s burned us and this window we are looking more pragmatically at direct first team players with the majority of funds, as I think we are, if current links are correct. 
 

Longer term, the first approach will probably be the way to go, we just aren’t at the stage where the first team is good enough yet. 

 

 

Edited by PRL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 08:25, gdm said:

The guy is just giving his opinion. As terrible as that opinion is he’s allowed it and telling him to jog on & fuck off hardly makes the place seem welcoming :lol:

Expand  

 

Since when did we start aiming for "welcoming"? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 09:05, Away Toon said:

We have Gordon, both Joe's, Anderson who prefers to play wide left for starters. We didn't need Barnes when we bought him, he's a luxury signing to back up Gordon that maybe in 5 years we will be in a position to do. I like Barnes, over a season he'll probably outscore Gordon, but where do you play Gordon in that case. He certainly doesn't like playing on the right.

Expand  

Anderson doesn't prefer to play wide left. He wants to play CM, in a 3 that's LM of the 3.

Gordon prefers the LW but is happy to play RW

 

Everything else you said is nonsense too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 08:25, gdm said:

The guy is just giving his opinion. As terrible as that opinion is he’s allowed it and telling him to jog on & fuck off hardly makes the place seem welcoming :lol:

Expand  

Welcoming?! [emoji38]

This place is welcoming in the same way your first day on a new cell block is welcoming. 

 

 

 

Edited by Holmesy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 10:11, Groundhog63 said:

Anderson doesn't prefer to play wide left. He wants to play CM, in a 3 that's LM of the 3.

Gordon prefers the LW but is happy to play RW

 

Everything else you said is nonsense too

Expand  

Gordon in an interview said he didn't like playing on the right and Eddie has shown no inclination to play him there. The others I mentioned all prefer playing on the left although none are conventional wingers. IMO Joe Linton is a much better wide player upfront than in midfield. And you don't state that other peoples opinions are nonsense just try sticking with not agreeing with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 11:51, Away Toon said:

Gordon in an interview said he didn't like playing on the right and Eddie has shown no inclination to play him there. The others I mentioned all prefer playing on the left although none are conventional wingers. IMO Joe Linton is a much better wide player upfront than in midfield. And you don't state that other peoples opinions are nonsense just try sticking with not agreeing with them.

Expand  

Shame he doesn’t like the right side, a fit Willock and Joelinton alternating on the left was really effective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard Gordon say he prefers the left but I've not heard him say he dislikes the right, just it's not his first option. I've heard him describe his versatility as an asset. Mind you I haven't heard everything he's said.

 

Re: Barnes - I think there was sense in buying him: a premier league proven player in his prime & we took advantage of a relagation. Also, at the time we got him we didn't know Gordon was going to start smashing it on the left wing and squads need quality depth. We lost a LW in ASM & replaced him.

 

For the money I don't think he was a massive bargain or a transformative signing like a Bruno, but he was a solid enough signing IMO. Just a shame he got that freak injury during our toughest part of the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 28/05/2024 at 12:22, Checko said:

I've heard Gordon say he prefers the left but I've not heard him say he dislikes the right, just it's not his first option. I've heard him describe his versatility as an asset. Mind you I haven't heard everything he's said.

 

Re: Barnes - I think there was sense in buying him: a premier league proven player in his prime & we took advantage of a relagation. Also, at the time we got him we didn't know Gordon was going to start smashing it on the left wing and squads need quality depth. We lost a LW in ASM & replaced him.

 

For the money I don't think he was a massive bargain or a transformative signing like a Bruno, but he was a solid enough signing IMO. Just a shame he got that freak injury during our toughest part of the season.

Expand  

Probs what I shouldve taken the time to type instead of describing his take as nonsense, which it is. 

Gordon will play RW if needed, no bother. 

Joelinton is a box to box beast and would be wasted at LW. Willock also. That's why we have Barnes AND Gordon. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...