Tino Livramento

[Joe1984]

1 minute ago, Novocastrian said:

Still nothing on the 115 charges? City spending like there’s nothing to worry about. What’s the hold up in with reporting the outcome?

They sold their army of lawyers to themselves to pay the fine...

[wormy]

6 minutes ago, Justdoesit said:

Yeah, he is an expensive loss for us - can cover both LB/RB at a great standard, and seemingly a popular lad in the squad. 

 

£120m+ to scare them off. 

 

My FM head is saying get £60m, Bobb and McAtee but that might even be less likely, haha. 

 

Yeah the most offputting thought that means I wants us to ask a record-breaking kind of fee is how great it's felt to lock down our full backs of the future so soon. Two young, English lads either side with their own qualities that could have us set there for a decade? Especially with Trips on the wind down and us still needing to future-proof centre back too.

[Kid Icarus]

Who do they think we are? The club that we want others to be when we try to sign their players!? Get fucked.

[Justdoesit]

1 minute ago, wormy said:

 

Yeah the most offputting thought that means I wants us to ask a record-breaking kind of fee is how great it's felt to lock down our full backs of the future so soon. Two young, English lads either side with their own qualities that could have us set there for a decade? Especially with Trips on the wind down and us still needing to future-proof centre back too.

 

100% agree - also love the idea of him and Hall being England's future full backs (annoying Lewis-Skelly is so good) for the next decade haha. 

 

I can't see Tino wanting to leave, although that might be naive of me. He doesn't seem the "ruffle feathers" type?

[Joe1984]

23 minutes ago, Ikon said:

They can piss off. Unless they Give us Bobb and Khusanov and 30m. 

 

 

 

Straight swap for Haaland with city subsidising £400k of his wages.

 

Just to make sure they understand Tino is ours.

[janpawel]

Tino has literally every attribute to be the perfect fullback, not lacking a single thing 

 

Which is why I do worry Man City could stump up £80-£100m for him, and the club would accept it 

[Ikon]

I don’t want us to sell him, and I don’t see us selling him unless for a ridiculous price like 80m+.

 

Having said that, we will need to do similar deals at times to be able to reinvest and grow quicker.

[The Butcher]

Just now, Justdoesit said:

 

100% agree - also love the idea of him and Hall being England's future full backs (annoying Lewis-Skelly is so good) for the next decade haha. 

 

I can't see Tino wanting to leave, although that might be naive of me. He doesn't seem the "ruffle feathers" type?

Better wages.

In every England squad regardless of how he plays.

Competing for titles every season.

 

Be surprised if he isn't interested.

[Andy84]

They can fuck right off 

[Displayname]

To me it can make sense if we can get what he is worth(£80-100m?). Allows us to build the squad required for CL. 

From what i've seen his best position clearly is LB, been fantastic there almost every game and only ok at RB. So we dont really get to use his full potential when Hall is available. 

[Joe1984]

Just now, Displayname said:

To me it can make sense if we can get what he is worth(£80-100m?). Allows us to build the squad required for CL. 

From what i've seen his best position clearly is LB, been fantastic there almost every game and only ok at RB. So we dont really get to use his full potential when Hall is available. 

No problem. 

 

Sell both Tino and Hall to them for £200m.

 

Throw Isak in too and that's £350-400m.

 

Build whatever squad we want then...

 

/s.

[The Prophet]

There's not a single bit of useful information in that Tweet, but he's still pushing it. Wonder who's payroll he's on in this case.

[Displayname]

Just now, Joe1984 said:

No problem. 

 

Sell both Tino and Hall to them for £200m.

 

Throw Isak in too and that's £350-400m.

 

Build whatever squad we want then...

 

/s.

Funny.

[Joe1984]

Just now, Displayname said:

Funny.

Well good!

 

I was going for funny! 😁

[Keggy_Keagal]

Pep loves an inverted Full back so Tino with his right foot on the left makes sense. Also like many others of the opinion that Tinos' also played his bets football for us there as well. As a right back he's been fine but doesn't yet seem as impactful.  I think Hall's  better long term as left back here so if the offer's right (£100million) we should take it. Clear some psr headroom and rebuild. 

[RodneyCisse]

The way football is now, if we double or triple our money on a player, they have to be sold to grow and compete.

[Hanshithispantz]

I'd only consider it if they offered their entire academy AND Oscar Bobb.

 

 

Edited Saturday at 17:45 by Hanshithispantz

[TBG]

Weekend RUINED.

[gbandit]

If they want him in time for the club World Cup too, then add an extra £15m to the £100m 

[Mike]

Don't like the idea of selling to our eventual rivals, feels like it give the (accurate) impression that we're below them imo. 

[Joe1984]

1 minute ago, TBG said:

Weekend RUINED.

A 1-0 win against Andorra isn't THAT bad... 🤣

[Turnbull2000]

Fuck me, losing Tino would be devastating. Unfortunately, we're still well down the pecking order of prestige and salaries against the breakaway 5, so not much we can do if he desires the move. It's almost certain he'd be first choice for England right now if he were playing for City.

[christ]

8 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

There's not a single bit of useful information in that Tweet, but he's still pushing it. Wonder who's payroll he's on in this case.

Class, innit? Says absolutely fuck all that we couldn’t already assume.

[Tsunami]

If he wants to go I guess he goes and we make City pay top dollar. Would be a huge miss and difficult to replace. Disappointing if he’s up for the move. 
 

 

[ianbeany]

Probably a load of bollocks of course but I've just seen a City ITK claiming we are demanding 70m+ and he is keen on the move